- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bank is cutting off My Pillow founder's organizations bank accounts, PLAYS audio of call
Posted on 1/15/22 at 6:03 am to BananaHammock
Posted on 1/15/22 at 6:03 am to BananaHammock
It’s funny that y’all think him selling pillows is an insult. Or that he is a worthless human because he sells pillows.
The guy turned his life around from a dark path and then started a small business and became successful.
And all the lefty says is “ heh heh pillows are for morons”
Again, ignoring all the reality and focusing on one innocuous meaningless trait.
The guy turned his life around from a dark path and then started a small business and became successful.
And all the lefty says is “ heh heh pillows are for morons”
Again, ignoring all the reality and focusing on one innocuous meaningless trait.
Posted on 1/15/22 at 6:07 am to Bbobalou
quote:
No evidence has been verified and if anything it's been disproven. Sounds
No voter id
No ballot verification
Last minute voting changed laws
Ballot harvesting
Mail in ballots received but not requested
Etc
The state run media did a great job of pivoting everyone to see that the “counts were correct.” And that’s what the audits showed.
We got 10 ballots here and we counted 10 ballots.
How they got those ballots and verified them has been ignored or forgotten about. And the laws surrounding those processes have been forgotten or ignored.
This simple truth should be easily supported by anyone:
You have to take the initiative to register to vote and get an ID. Both free. Both easy to do.
You vote in person with a state issued ID on Election Day.
If you can’t make it in person you have to take the initiative to request a mail on ballot and have it verified.
That’s it.
If you can’t follow one of those rules you can’t vote.
This post was edited on 1/15/22 at 6:09 am
Posted on 1/15/22 at 7:40 am to Jjdoc
Bongino is right.
We need our own banks.
If someone knows of a conservative bank or even just a freedom loving bank post it.
We need our own banks.
If someone knows of a conservative bank or even just a freedom loving bank post it.
Posted on 1/15/22 at 7:49 am to Jjdoc
quote:
Friendly reminder that y’all are defending this buttfrick:
No, I am defending the right of a person to do business within the laws of this nation.
Dumbass
This!
My banana hammock guy, do you even slippery slope?
Posted on 1/15/22 at 7:53 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
But your gripe with the bank is that they should be forced (?) to continue to do business with someone they feel may be a liability or a detriment to their brand? Who is the real fascist here forcing private firms to continue commercial relationships they would rather not continue in?
Get real dude, and you know you are being disingenuous here.
First of all, this isn't some little mom and pop community bank. This bank has robust protection from the FDIC, and will be protected by tax payers.
Additionally, if they de-financed for something like his race, religion, citizenship, you know you would have an issue with it, and you know it would be illega.. So stop pretending to be some principled libertarian.
Posted on 1/15/22 at 8:28 am to Nguyener
quote:MASS PSYCHOSIS FORMATION
And all the lefty says is “ heh heh pillows are for morons”
Again, ignoring all the reality and focusing on one innocuous meaningless trait.
Posted on 1/15/22 at 8:34 am to boosiebadazz
quote:and who was clamoring for commercial access in a commercial relationship to BAKE THE DAMN CAKE?
But your gripe with the bank is that they should be forced (?) to continue to do business with someone they feel may be a liability or a detriment to their brand? Who is the real fascist here forcing private firms to continue commercial relationships they would rather not continue in?
Access to commercial relationships being weaponized? oh yeah post-Obama style weaponization...
One of the USAs two or three biggest problems
and a source for all of you so-called progressive, IN REALITY fascists..
[not to mention your Mass Psychosis Formation and its first steps of massive hypocrisy]
Posted on 1/15/22 at 9:45 am to bird35
quote:
We need our own banks.
We definitely need our own stuff including insurance companies.
We have to remember, the left are using these same tactics to take out the O&G industry. Pressuring banks to not give out loans, and backing their play by getting insurance companies to reject policies. Only way to get EVs going
Posted on 1/15/22 at 10:20 am to Jjdoc
Tell me again how Trump was a dictator?
Posted on 1/15/22 at 10:20 am to Strannix
The JEWS treated the Russians the same way. Did you ever wonder how many of the "JEWS" were communists?
Posted on 1/15/22 at 10:21 am to TOSOV
quote:Going to? They have been going after capital investors for a while.
We have to remember, the left are using these same tactics to take out the O&G industry. Pressuring banks to not give out loans, and backing their play by getting insurance companies to reject policies. Only way to get EVs going
Posted on 1/15/22 at 10:22 am to boosiebadazz
quote:If business have to violate their religion, a minuscule business risk is nothing. Especially a business where there are only a few alternatives—and all the banks are tied to a the Fed.
But your gripe with the bank is that they should be forced (?) to continue to do business with someone they feel may be a liability or a detriment to their brand?
Banks are essentially state actors at this point. They should be bound by the equal protection of Constitution
This post was edited on 1/15/22 at 10:29 am
Posted on 1/15/22 at 10:24 am to bird35
Capital One has been pretty quiet on the woke crap? Cancelled my Citi card and I am getting a capital one credit card.
Posted on 1/15/22 at 10:26 am to Strannix
You can’t hide in my attic Anne Pillow
Posted on 1/15/22 at 10:35 am to NashvilleTider
Mollie Hemingway was just on Clay and Buck.
She said the actual fraud was secondary to what went on at a higher level with changing laws to enable it and other machinations by types like Zuckerberg.
She could've added Secretaries of State like our own Ardoin with their commitment and dedication to Dominion.
She said the actual fraud was secondary to what went on at a higher level with changing laws to enable it and other machinations by types like Zuckerberg.
She could've added Secretaries of State like our own Ardoin with their commitment and dedication to Dominion.
Posted on 1/15/22 at 12:18 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
But your gripe with the bank is that they should be forced (?) to continue to do business with someone they feel may be a liability or a detriment to their brand?
LOL. The banks that launder money for drug cartels? The banks that charge improper fees and intentionally process debits before deposits that were made earlier just to charge overdraft fees? The banks that illegally used trust funds to cover lawsuit costs? Banks that gave out loans knowing that they would not repaid by the borrowers so the bank could take the property and be covered by the US government? You think those banks give a shite about reputation? Please tell me you're not that dumb.
Posted on 1/15/22 at 12:24 pm to TenWheelsForJesus
He needs to move all his assets to Crypto.com Coin CRO. This is the only way.
Posted on 1/15/22 at 1:22 pm to jackamo3300
quote:
She said the actual fraud was secondary
I understand what she’s saying but ballot harvesting IS fraud in states where it’s illegal. Georgia is one of those states.
Posted on 1/15/22 at 1:24 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
ut your gripe with the bank is that they should be forced (?) to continue to do business with someone they feel may be a liability or a detriment to their brand?
It is gutless weasels like you that need to be eradicated
So if I don’t like you I don’t have to do business with you with no restrictions…
Posted on 1/15/22 at 1:32 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
But your gripe with the bank is that they should be forced (?) to continue to do business with someone they feel may be a liability or a detriment to their brand? Who is the real fascist here forcing private firms to continue commercial relationships they would rather not continue in?
As a nation we’ve already decided there’s absolutely nothing wrong with that.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News