- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Atty General nomination- WTH
Posted on 7/30/26 at 6:03 pm
Posted on 7/30/26 at 6:03 pm
Somebody explain to me why senators (John Cornyn and Tillis) or any congressman for that matter, need concessions to vote for an atty General?
WTH hell are they asking for?
WTH hell are they asking for?
Posted on 7/30/26 at 6:09 pm to Guntoter1
They want the money that Trump won from the Trump IRS tax return leakage that Trump donated.. Thune has spasms if he hears any J6 prisoner gets a dime.
They also supposedly snuck in them getting $500,000 per line of the wire taps Jack Smith did.
They also supposedly snuck in them getting $500,000 per line of the wire taps Jack Smith did.
This post was edited on 7/30/26 at 6:13 pm
Posted on 7/30/26 at 6:18 pm to Guntoter1
I’d go to the source to answer questions like that.
Have they provided reasons publicly?
Have they provided reasons publicly?
Posted on 7/30/26 at 6:24 pm to Guntoter1
No slush fund, no vote, sounds like a pretty logical, conservative position. But... here we are.
Posted on 7/30/26 at 7:06 pm to Guntoter1
Cornyn has no incentive to bend over for Trump anymore
Posted on 7/30/26 at 7:08 pm to Guntoter1
Because those two aren’t really republicans and would rather die than give Trump the ability to implement long term changes in DC.
Posted on 7/30/26 at 7:12 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
President Trump notes he will not accept the threats and blackmail from both outgoing senators and will renominate Todd Blanche if needed after the two senators are removed from office.
Posted on 7/30/26 at 7:42 pm to Guntoter1
quote:
WTH hell are they asking for?
one last time to frick over their constituents.
Posted on 7/30/26 at 7:46 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
They want the money that Trump won from the Trump IRS tax return leakage that Trump donated.. Thune has spasms if he hears any J6 prisoner gets a dime.
Trump didn’t “win” any money. He directed the IRS director and the DOJ, from one side of the lawsuit, to settle the case with him, from the other side of the lawsuit, for $1.776 billion of your tax dollars. Additionally, he mandated the IRS and the DOJ, from one side of the lawsuit, enter into an agreement with him, his related entities, and kids, from the other side of the lawsuit, that they would all be immune from audits.
But Hunter Biden sold some paintings so this is all ok in MAGA world.
This post was edited on 7/30/26 at 7:48 pm
Posted on 7/30/26 at 7:51 pm to boosiebadazz
You copied and pasted that script perfectly comrade!
Posted on 7/30/26 at 7:52 pm to Guntoter1
What are they asking for?
2001 back. That’s what they’re asking for
2001 back. That’s what they’re asking for
Posted on 7/30/26 at 7:52 pm to honeybadger07
But I notice you didn’t dispute any of it.
Posted on 7/30/26 at 8:05 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Trump didn’t “win” any money. He directed the IRS director and the DOJ, from one side of the lawsuit, to settle the case with him, from the other side of the lawsuit, for $1.776 billion of your tax dollars.
For victims of weaponization and the lawfare that you support.
quote:
Additionally, he mandated the IRS and the DOJ, from one side of the lawsuit, enter into an agreement with him, his related entities, and kids, from the other side of the lawsuit, that they would all be immune from audits.
During the period where the government weaponized every process they could against him and his close supporters. Not going forward in perpetuity.
Posted on 7/30/26 at 8:07 pm to Guntoter1
Because they don’t want the federal government to make a slush fund for convicted felons? What’s hard to understand?
Posted on 7/30/26 at 8:13 pm to boosiebadazz
I purposely said "won" to knaw at legal minds sensibilities so a legal expert would lay it all out.
Did he win a settlement in a lawsuit or not? It is complicated but I'll start here.
My memory is a bit fuzzy, you can help. I prefer Sheldon, but you'll do. At first Trump designated monies from the settlement he won and didn't lose-- to those affected by Obama /Bidens political prosecutions and lawfare.
Thune et al...had 3 litters of kittens over it and started in on the J6thers better not get a dime blah blah. Folks and the Congress critters and everybody and their mothers were lining up for a deluxe apartments in the sky.
Trumps lawyers then negotiated for Trump only and an ask was no more audits for his entire family...and what else?
Did he win a settlement in a lawsuit or not? It is complicated but I'll start here.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. My memory is a bit fuzzy, you can help. I prefer Sheldon, but you'll do. At first Trump designated monies from the settlement he won and didn't lose-- to those affected by Obama /Bidens political prosecutions and lawfare.
Thune et al...had 3 litters of kittens over it and started in on the J6thers better not get a dime blah blah. Folks and the Congress critters and everybody and their mothers were lining up for a deluxe apartments in the sky.
Trumps lawyers then negotiated for Trump only and an ask was no more audits for his entire family...and what else?
Posted on 7/30/26 at 8:17 pm to boosiebadazz
Posted on 7/30/26 at 8:26 pm to Guntoter1
That reason should not be reason, reason should be because he is potus’ personal atty and will continue to use position to protect one man and not work for interests of American people. The.slush funds/IRS agreements is really a part of a bigger problem with his nomination.
Posted on 7/30/26 at 8:27 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
U.S. Sen. John Cornyn is threatening to block the confirmation of acting Attorney General Todd Blanche unless he changes the terms of a controversial IRS settlement with President Donald Trump and his family.
The Texas Republican told reporters Monday he wanted a clause removed from the settlement that would create a $1.8 billion "anti-weaponization" fund for people who believed they were wronged by the criminal justice system to receive payouts, according to media reports.
The Trump administration has said that fund will not go ahead, following pushback from Republicans and Democrats alike. But Cornyn wants to see the change in writing.
"That’s what we’re trying to get them to agree to, which is again what his sworn testimony was,” Cornyn said Monday, referring to Blanche. “So I don’t know why they’re so reluctant to do that.”
U.S. Sen Thom Tillis, R-NC, also threatened to vote against Blanche if the settlement is not redrawn, creating a potential roadblock for his confirmation. With Democrats in opposition, Cornyn, Tillis and every other Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee would need to vote yes to advance Blanche's nomination to the Senate floor.
Want more Houston Chronicle? No
Posted on 7/31/26 at 7:28 am to boosiebadazz
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.quote:
TRUMP JUST EXPOSED JOHN CORNYN
Cornyn had zero problem with the Fund for the patriots who were hunted down and had their lives destroyed by the Biden DOJ…
Until Trump endorsed his primary opponent.
The second that opponent won the nomination, Cornyn flipped.
Trump even waived any money for himself, including the illegal Mar-a-Lago raid, and is still fighting for the people who got crushed.
Cornyn only “cared” when it became politically useful.
Texas already saw through him.
The rest of the country and boosie, are catching up.
Popular
Back to top
10












