re: Appeals court calls Trump administration's defiance over mistakenly deported man shocking.

quote:

---

I’m not one who forgets the day the music died with that travesty of police state abuse.

---

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)



The Supreme Court has acknowledged that the executive branch has more latitude in areas that fall within its specific domain.

The liberal downvoter doesn’t like truth but that who they are

quote:

---

Maybe I’m reading you wrong, and if so I apologize right here and now. But even if so, there are clearly numerous others who’ve taken that position. Which sure seems awfully dramatic.

---

Thanks for the respectful tone. This is a complex issue. Abrego Garcia is not the least important, noble, or worthy of being in America.

HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN DEPORTED IN 2019, under Trump 1 to a third country OR the hold should have been dissolved because Abrego Garcia was no longer under threat in El Salvador.

It's worth noting that Steven Miller's compelling argument re deportation under the Alien Enemies Act is irrelevant. The DOJ has had ample time to amend their pleadings to allege that Abrego Garcia was deported under the AEA. For some reason, DOJ chose not to amend their pleadings.

What's unusual about this case is the government's defense: we made a mistake; while Abrego Garcia should have been deported, he shouldn't have been deported to El Salvador because of the 2019 Trump Immigration Judge's order specifically barring his deportation to El Salvador (see affidavit of ICE Field Director); we have been successful in putting Abrego Garcia beyond the jurisdiction of American courts, so we can't be ordered to correct that mistake.

So, if removal by mistake has no remedy, the Executive can just claim "good faith mistake" in removing ANYONE. For instance, "Our agents made a good faith mistake in deporting THIS citizen named Juan Sanchez to El Salvador, we really meant to deport THAT guy named Juan Sanchez who is an Abrego-Garcia-level scumbag illegal immigrant. Sorry about that, but it's out of our hands."...will be a successful argument by the Executive in all future cases.

When it comes down to it, this has probably always been the case. We've just never had an Administration ballsy enough to assert this. I'm not even saying it's necessarily a bad thing. Thanks to Biden, we have a MASSIVE illegal immigrant problem that can only be solved by novel means. I'm just noting what an unusual situation this is. [Thanks for coming to my TED Talk.]

quote:

---

People are so bored with their pathetic lives they are rallying support for illegal criminal gang members to defy Trump

Democrats are a piece of work, but I’ll hand it to them, their mission knows no bounds and stick together through all the insanity.

---

They did this same shite for that Khashoggi dude.

quote:

---

Sorry about that, but it's out of our hands

---

But this is actually the case. Especially where the person was returned to his own country, which is an often overlooked aspect of this situation.

The idea that France or Sweden could order the United States to release one of our own citizens from an American jail is silly on its face.

Yet that is what is being asked here.

That should be obvious to anyone who doesn’t have their head up their arse

quote:

---

They;ve absolutely blown this entire thing out of proportion.

---

You don't have to write a brief, but why do you think it was overblown?

It’s an example of why the Democratic Party Is decreasing in numbers down to it core constituency which is more progressive and authoritative than the traditional liberal

Edit: radical would probably be a better term than progressive

Thanks for the reply. I'm SUPER old school re extra-Constitutional military actions. So, that wasn't just a talking point to me.