- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anybody know how the Democrats are going to spin this picture?
Posted on 1/8/26 at 8:41 pm to Crawdaddy
Posted on 1/8/26 at 8:41 pm to Crawdaddy
Must not have been too scared for her life. She had been harassing them all day and was the lead vehicle. Police officers are not trained to shoot tires. They are trained to neutralize the threat of the deadly weapon. In this case the car was the deadly weapon and they have been used time and time again.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 8:42 pm to Crawdaddy
quote:
She was scared for her life
Thus is also BS. She knew she was in trouble and rightly so, and she was running. If she’d obeyed lawful orders she’d be alive. But the officer still shouldn’t have pulled the trigger
Posted on 1/8/26 at 8:46 pm to FoTownBam
It’s refreshing to see some objective analysis on here. The officer also fired at least one shot after the car had passed him by - it’s going to be hard to claim he was defending himself as a result.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 8:46 pm to Boss13
quote:
They will say, in a completely serious tone, he should have gotten out of the way and had no right to use deadly force against someone trying to run him over.
A poster today literally said that if the car is accelerating towards you, you have to brace for it and then tough it out after it hits you.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 8:47 pm to FoTownBam
quote:
I’m not a Democrat,
Means nothing.
quote:
but if the ICE agent wasn’t in the process of trying to shoot the woman in the head, he could’ve easily stepped to the side.
Means nothing. The woman was ordered to stop and exit the car.
quote:
And he wasn’t even hit
Video shows that you are blind and an idiot.
quote:
The woman should be in jail, not shot.
The woman is dead because she chose to be.
quote:
Anyone saying that officer was fearful of his life is blinded by politics.
That officer was run over in June by idiots that caused surgery and 37 stitches.
quote:
I blame Democrats for the propaganda that drove this woman to act so stupid
Absolutely.
quote:
but that ICE officer has to have more gun control.
No he does not. The idiots trying to disrupt law enforcement FAFO.
quote:
He clearly let frustration drive him to fire his weapon, not fear of his life
He had already been run over and learned to stop it.
In short, you are wrong and also an example of why this country is where it is. More people like you will FA and FO. Enjoy your lessons.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 8:48 pm to TBoy
quote:
That is an intentional killing, not self defense.
Self-defense killings are by accident?
When a cop pulls the trigger, he's trained to keep pulling the trigger until the target is neutralized. That's why his firing into her open window matters zero.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 8:50 pm to TBoy
He fired three shots. The second and third shots were fired from the side of the car through the open driver’s door window into her head.
This is eliminating the deadly threat, dumbass.
This is eliminating the deadly threat, dumbass.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:01 pm to Patato Salad
quote:
It’s refreshing to see some objective analysis on here
Everyone here thinks they have to politicize everything. If the media and Democrats hadn’t have been politicizing ICE doing their jobs, this woman probably wouldn’t have been out there harassing the ICE agents and would still be alive.
I just happen to believe 2 things can be true
1- The woman shouldn’t have been doing what she was doing
2-But she should still be alive
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:10 pm to FoTownBam
How did she get her vehicle sideways in the road and why? I assume this is what attracted the officers to her. Then she wasn’t following directions of the officer who clearly was trying to get her attention and eventually out of the vehicle. Seemed like the officer who was concerned with being run over walked in front of her vehicle when she was moving backwards. She may not have seen him but that doesn’t give her the right to disregard the officer at her window telling her to stop. Had she followed his directions she would have likely been taken down town and released to her loving wife and children. Instead she went forward putting the officer in front of her, whether she saw him or not, in jeopardy of serious body harm or worse. He could not know the outcome of her action, whether she would turn right or left, go down the street or up the street and he had to make a choice in a very short period of time all caused by a string of her bad decisions. He did know at some point he was going to likely be hit and was.He was taken to the hospital. Now everyone gets to play arm chair quarterback with slow motion and frame by frame. She created a horrible situation that has caused turmoil in our country when these officers have to deal with a public inflamed by politicians who need illegals and their families votes for election.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:12 pm to BigTigerJoe
quote:
I need to wait and react to this until it is thoroughly analyzed by IBM.
Where's the still of him being hit???
I have now said about 20 times it was a justified shoot, because Agent Ross reasonably thought his life was in danger.
I have just objected to the outrageous lies our officials have told us. For instance, Noem said it was an act of domestic terrorism...that Good tried to ram the ICE agents that were trying to dig their vehicle out of the snow and that Agent Scott saved himself and his fellow agents by shooting Good.
That doesn’t embarrass any of y'all? Anybody want to defend that?
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:13 pm to Warboo
quote:
are wrong and also an example of why this country is where it is.
Hate filled and one sided? No people like you are why this country is where it is. I refuse to let my political views dictate how I view a human life. I’m sorry this officer was previously hit. I’m sorry people like this woman constantly harass and threaten him and his coworkers. I’m sorry he has to deal with the political nonsense from the left. But that woman wasn’t a threat.
quote:
Means nothing. The woman was ordered to stop and exit the car.
So you’re admitting that because she violated an order is the reason she was shot. I thought it was because “he feared his life”?
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:22 pm to ulmtiger
quote:
Had she followed his directions she would have likely been taken down town and released to her loving wife and children
Agreed
quote:
He could not know the outcome of her action, whether she would turn right or left
He was literally standing in front, she turns right, then he shoots her in the side of the front windshield as she was turning away. It was clear he was just pissed off that she wasn’t obeying their orders. She never should’ve been shot.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:24 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Where's the still of him being hit???
I have now said about 20 times it was a justified shoot, because Agent Ross reasonably thought his life was in danger.
I have just objected to the outrageous lies our officials have told us. For instance, Noem said it was an act of domestic terrorism...that Good tried to ram the ICE agents that were trying to dig their vehicle out of the snow and that Agent Scott saved himself and his fellow agents by shooting Good.
That doesn’t embarrass any of y'all? Anybody want to defend that?
I wonder if any pictures of bruises were photographed when he went to the hospital.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:24 pm to FoTownBam
Agreed. It’s really a simple concept. Instead it’s just idiots rushing to find any evidence that confirms their preexisting bias.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:25 pm to Boss13
quote:
trying to run him over.
This is where you lost me. I watched the video. It was clear that she was trying to leave the scene, not run him over. Does an officer have the legal right to shoot someone leaving the scene? That’s the question, but saying that she was trying to run him over is disingenuous
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:26 pm to Patato Salad
quote:
Instead it’s just idiots rushing to find any evidence that confirms their preexisting bias.
You hit the nail on the head
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:27 pm to FoTownBam
quote:
This is where you lost me. I watched the video. It was clear that she was trying to leave the scene
Yeah, she was clearly trying to leave the scene... by going over the officer in front of the vehicle....
Posted on 1/8/26 at 9:29 pm to Lawyered
He should have just gotten run over. Muh!!!! Justice!!!!
Popular
Back to top


0



