Another woke moron that is totally clueless

Basically this is the Bill Burr defense.

The "underserved" community that this film was designed to appeal to didnt go to see it, or they did and are just too small a group to make the film a success.

Therefore, its whitey's fault.

Perhaps people weren't interested in the plot?

Matt Walsh nails this one. He says it's basically a chick flick for queers. Straight men don't want to go see straight romantic comedies. Why would they want to go see a bunch of gays guys in a a gay movie?

BTW - apparently, there is the suggestion of orgies and threesomes in this abomination. You know, just like in any Diane Keaton movie.

It's just another example of "tolerance" (or silence) = "hate". It's not enough to simply say "I'm not gay...but I don't have an issue if you are." If one is not in full throated support of the "movement" then you are a "homophobe".

The lack of support for the movement is a shocking development for the Hollywood bubble. They truly don't understand that 95% (probably more) of the people in the US are NOT homosexual and don't feel some overwhelming desire to "support the movement". The movie's realistic market was a very small niche group...and now the producer is surprised that's all who wanted to see it.

quote:

---

The critics score on rotten tomatoes was so good too.

---

That rating system is simply another cog in the gear of woke.

Dave Chappelle's last Netflix special has a 40% rating by critics, but 95% by the audience. Maybe these people just don't know what entertainment actually is.

quote:

---

figs are not a good draw?

---

I wouldn't think so...

IF I go to the movies, it is a movie worth seeing on the big screen... 99% of the time, that means action or maybe the occasional horror movie...

After that, I am not wasting my time sleeping through comedies, chick flicks, cartoons, etc... So, for me personally, figs are not even going to come close to making the list...

Of course, I will not watch it when it is streaming either...

Well he's kinda right. Most people are straight, most people don't want to watch a movie like that. If you make something for a small few then expect a small outcome.

Maybe virtue signalers don't care so much about virtue signaling when it costs them money.

These people are so far gone it's not worth even trying to bring them back down to reality. This dipshit made a move targeting less than 1% of the population then gets pissed when no one goes to see it. I'd love to live in their brain for just a day to see how it works.

I'm done caring (and have been for awhile) if they call me names. They're irrelevant, just like Rotten Tomatoes and all the "critics" who are too afraid to be seen criticizing "Black Panther" and "The Woman King".

I watched the trailer, and it was peak cringe. Besides the boring meta type of plot (like when an author writes a book about an author writing a book, since that was on his mind), the squealing and phaggotry were nauseating. It seemed like a reboot of that "Fred" annoying Nickelodeon guy (surprise surprise he's gay) where he's out of the closet and taking speed.