- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Another Trump win in Court - this time at DC Circuit
Posted on 12/6/25 at 2:12 pm to nick__21
Posted on 12/6/25 at 2:12 pm to nick__21
quote:
No it isn't.
What can the president execute without Congress creating it? What executive power exists for the President without Congress creating it?
Take the case in op, for example. Who created the NLRB? If they had never done so, could the President execute anything related to the NLRB?
This post was edited on 12/6/25 at 2:12 pm
Posted on 12/6/25 at 2:12 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
slow mo is so upset
Giving this power to Future Democrat presidents is not going to be pretty
Posted on 12/6/25 at 2:16 pm to tigerfan 64
quote:
The FCC was stacked with dems.
If you're going to make shite up, a disclaimer at the outset would be helpful
Posted on 12/6/25 at 2:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Giving this power to Future Democrat presidents is not going to be pretty
Same bullshite argument against getting rid of the filibuster.
It presumes the Dems won't do it anyway.
Posted on 12/6/25 at 2:38 pm to BarberitosDawg
You still need help understanding how to meme properly
Posted on 12/6/25 at 10:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What can the president execute without Congress creating it?
Doesn't matter if congress creates something. The executive doesn't have to do it. Congress' power is the money. They can deny money for things or put money up for things but the president doesn't have to spend it, that is the next fight to win.
The remedy for a president not doing something is the voters electing someone else if they dont like it.
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:50 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You still need help understanding how to meme properly
You still don’t understand what a meme is.
And it’s definitely not a surprise that you aren’t intelligent enough to understand why his meme is a perfect representation of you in this thread.
Posted on 12/7/25 at 12:38 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That power is granted to the Executive by Congress. Whatever power there is to execute is supposed to be limited by what Congress creates.
Yea. Congress granted the executive branch its Article 2 powers
Posted on 12/7/25 at 3:43 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:The larger question, assuming basis to your opinion, is where in the foggy vapors of Judicial Branch actions did the Law get so bastardized in the first place, and how in Hades do we prevent recurrence of the same mistake?
The admin is seeking to reverse what our current law is. You want to punish courts for following the current state of the law.
Posted on 12/7/25 at 5:10 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That power is granted to the Executive by Congress
How can one fggot always be so wrong about everything?
Posted on 12/7/25 at 5:40 am to SlowFlowPro
I believe the supreme court will overturn Humphrey's Executor soon as well.
To be honest, I dont even know why we need these agencies in the first place.
To be honest, I dont even know why we need these agencies in the first place.
This post was edited on 12/7/25 at 6:00 am
Posted on 12/7/25 at 5:42 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
A better description is stripping Congress of its power and consolidating federal power in the Executive
Congress did this with the filibuster and several other rules and regs to neuter their power ensuring nothing gets done other than their kickbacks.
Posted on 12/7/25 at 6:40 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
consolidating federal power in the Executive
better than consolidating federal power in unelected, lifetime democrat political asshats in black robes
Posted on 12/7/25 at 6:44 am to nick__21
quote:
They can deny money for things or put money up for things but the president doesn't have to spend it, that is the next fight to win.
THIS is the facet we too often fail to exercise properly
Posted on 12/7/25 at 7:37 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That power is granted to the Executive by Congress
horseshite. You’re a lawyer?
Posted on 12/7/25 at 7:49 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:show me in the Constitution where it says the legislative branch gets to establish executive branch agencies that are outside of the control of the executive branch? The 'independent' agencies were a legislative branch power grab in the first place, and a villain of the separation of powers
better description is stripping Congress of its power and consolidating federal power in the Executive
Posted on 12/7/25 at 8:15 am to narddogg81
quote:Congress passed a law establishing the NLRB and continues to fund it. That law stated the President will appoint the members of the board subject to advise & consent of the Senate. Congress granted him that power in the Wagner act. If the President has the right to appoint, he has the power to remove.
show me in the Constitution where it says the legislative branch gets to establish executive branch agencies that are outside of the control of the executive branch? The 'independent' agencies were a legislative branch power grab in the first place, and a villain of the separation of powers
If Congress wants that power back, they can amend or repeal the Wagner act.
That law also established the 'independent' part which means those appointments make the decisions without direct control from any other member of EITHER the legislative or executive branch, including the President. So limited powers were granted to the executive branch by Congress creating the independent part (subject to oversight by Congress and since they have police powers review by the DOJ).
One of those powers not limited, in fact specifically granted, was appointment.
Popular
Back to top



1







