- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/30/25 at 5:58 pm to loogaroo
Is this the judge who added an addendum to his ruling that is like a 12 page rant about Trump's personality?
Yes, it is.
According to Grok:
Seems totally appropriate.
Also, I believe this guy was appointed by Reagan as part of an agreement with Tip O'Neill to appoint bipartisan judges. Remember when the two sides used to actually work together and compromise with each other?
Yes, it is.
According to Grok:
quote:
The opinion ends with an extended personal reflection, invoking a quote from Young's wife ("He ignores everything and keeps bullying ahead") to critique Trump's governance style, warning that the president cynically exploits public division to erode rights, and calling on Americans to defend constitutional values. Young described this as his "most important" ruling in 30 years on the bench.
Seems totally appropriate.
Also, I believe this guy was appointed by Reagan as part of an agreement with Tip O'Neill to appoint bipartisan judges. Remember when the two sides used to actually work together and compromise with each other?
Posted on 9/30/25 at 5:59 pm to loogaroo
fricking boomers.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 6:10 pm to Tiger1242
quote:
but don’t we as a country agree with free speech?
For citizens... it isn't exactly rocket science to not speak ill or go activist against the country you are visiting.
They have the specially granted permission to be here as long as, and no longer than, the executive will have them.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 6:14 pm to udtiger
quote:
See if you can spot the problem...
quote:
The President’s palpable misunderstanding that the government simply cannot seek retribution for speech he disdains
poses a great threat to Americans’ freedom of speech,” Young wrote,
frickin found it.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 6:17 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
If you are here illegally, this administration wants you gone.
FIFY retard
Posted on 9/30/25 at 6:18 pm to Decatur
quote:Tremendous maturity on the Judge's part ...
I love how it’s written as a response to the anonymous postcard writer.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 6:31 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
For citizens... it isn't exactly rocket science to not speak ill or go activist against the country you are visiting.
I get this line of thinking. I didn’t read the article or the opinion, are these people saying anti-American things or are they only pro-Palestine?
Posted on 9/30/25 at 6:39 pm to Tiger1242
quote:
I didn’t read the article or the opinion, are these people saying anti-American things or are they only pro-Palestine?
The two go hand in hand... ask Shapiro, a democrat.
This post was edited on 9/30/25 at 7:23 pm
Posted on 9/30/25 at 8:33 pm to loogaroo
quote:
decried Trump’s “great threat to Americans’ freedom of speech.”
Ummmmmmmm visa holders aren't Americans doofus.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 8:38 pm to antibarner
The Judge is clearly saying that if you are here legally, the constitution applies to you. This means the 1st Amendment.
Why are the reactionary right so dense when it comes to this stuff? If we are at war with some country or the person here is actively engaged in illegal activity to oppose the government or they are found to be operating on behalf of another government they will be deported.
If they are here legally and say something that the administration doesn't like that needs to be tolerated. If we start down this path the 1st becomes meaningless and that will come back to bite the right when they are out of power.
For the love of Trump some of yall are willing to toss the constitution out the window.
Why are the reactionary right so dense when it comes to this stuff? If we are at war with some country or the person here is actively engaged in illegal activity to oppose the government or they are found to be operating on behalf of another government they will be deported.
If they are here legally and say something that the administration doesn't like that needs to be tolerated. If we start down this path the 1st becomes meaningless and that will come back to bite the right when they are out of power.
For the love of Trump some of yall are willing to toss the constitution out the window.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 9:04 pm to hansenthered1
quote:
The Judge is clearly saying that if you are here legally, the constitution applies to you. This means the 1st Amendment.
Frick that. It's disrespectful to go to another nation and do what they've been doing. They need to know their place. Having an opinion in a coffee shop isn't the same as protesting/rioting.
"Here legally" =/= Citizen.
Posted on 10/1/25 at 5:56 am to HagaDaga
The constitution applies to everyone in the USA. If you don't like that get out. Some of yall never had a basic civics class or you failed the one you took.
The God Given Rights expressed in the Bill of Rights and Constitution are not something that apply to only citizens.
The God Given Rights expressed in the Bill of Rights and Constitution are not something that apply to only citizens.
Posted on 10/1/25 at 6:22 am to loogaroo
quote:
deliberate attack on free speech meant to “strike fear” into non-citizen students and chill campus protests.
Lol... duh! A university should be a place for learning and not allow traitorous agitators to provoke violent "protest".
Posted on 10/1/25 at 6:27 am to loogaroo
Well if he was appointed by Reagan he is a boomer and is probably losing his mind.
We seem to have an epidemic of boomers going woke and stupid
We seem to have an epidemic of boomers going woke and stupid
Posted on 10/1/25 at 6:28 am to Tiger1242
quote:
If they are here legally doesn’t it make sense they shouldn’t be deported for speaking their opinions? I
If their opinion is that innocent women and children should be murdered then yes, they are undesireable. A US citizen has some right to speak that opinion but a guest does not
This post was edited on 10/1/25 at 6:52 am
Posted on 10/1/25 at 6:30 am to loogaroo
Ignore him!
Posted on 10/1/25 at 6:38 am to SallysHuman
quote:
quote:
but don’t we as a country agree with free speech?
For citizens... it isn't exactly rocket science to not speak ill or go activist against the country you are visiting.
They have the specially granted permission to be here as long as, and no longer than, the executive will have them
SallysHuman, isnt it amazing that has to be explained???
Posted on 10/1/25 at 6:39 am to loogaroo
Tell the judge to enforce his order...
Posted on 10/1/25 at 6:58 am to lake chuck fan
quote:
SallysHuman, isnt it amazing that has to be explained???
These people are taking crazy pills!
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News