- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Another activist judge rules against deporting pro-Palestinian academics illegal
Posted on 9/30/25 at 5:20 pm
Posted on 9/30/25 at 5:20 pm
quote:
The Reagan-appointed judge decried Trump’s “great threat to Americans’ freedom of speech.”
quote:
A federal judge ruled Tuesday that the Trump administration’s effort to deport pro-Palestinian academics is a deliberate attack on free speech meant to “strike fear” into non-citizen students and chill campus protests.
“The effect of these targeted deportation proceedings continues unconstitutionally to chill freedom of speech to this day,” U.S. District Judge William Young concluded, in a scathing, 161-page opinion that he described as the most crucial he’s delivered in his 30 years on the bench.
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/09/30/judge-young-ruling-trump-deportation-free-speech-00588114
18
Posted on 9/30/25 at 5:21 pm to loogaroo
The judge can bring them back after they are deported.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 5:23 pm to Sofaking2
He does not have the authority. They are here illegally and they can chill in their home countries.
They dont have any right to be here raising hell and he knows it.
They dont have any right to be here raising hell and he knows it.
This post was edited on 9/30/25 at 5:24 pm
Posted on 9/30/25 at 5:24 pm to loogaroo
I mean… are they doing anything more than talking?
Maybe I need to read the whole piece to see what part to be outraged about, because what you clipped out doesn’t make the ruling seem like a crazy ruling. But I’m not giving politico the click.
Maybe I need to read the whole piece to see what part to be outraged about, because what you clipped out doesn’t make the ruling seem like a crazy ruling. But I’m not giving politico the click.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 5:25 pm to funnystuff
It does not matter what they are doing. If they are here illegally he hasn't got a leg to stand on.
They have NO RIGHT to be here.
They have NO RIGHT to be here.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 5:29 pm to funnystuff
quote:
I mean… are they doing anything more than talking?
It doesn't matter. The president is in control of these things. Executive Discretion.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 5:29 pm to antibarner
Which part of the article says they are here illegally?
Posted on 9/30/25 at 5:29 pm to funnystuff
If you engage in wrongthink on certain subjects, this administration wants you gone.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 5:30 pm to funnystuff
quote:
Which part of the article says they are here illegally?
It probably doesn't... they are on one kind of visa or another that can be yanked at the discretion of the executive.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 5:31 pm to loogaroo
Posted on 9/30/25 at 5:31 pm to loogaroo
Their goal is subversion of the American government.
They need to GTFO
They need to GTFO
Posted on 9/30/25 at 5:32 pm to funnystuff
quote:
Which part of the article says they are here illegally?
Cant deport a citizen. Now if theyre here on a Green Card or some sort of Visa that too can legally be revoked as Marco Rubio has stated. You do not have a RIGHT to be here it is a privilege.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 5:36 pm to loogaroo
What’s to be outraged about? If they are here legally doesn’t it make sense they shouldn’t be deported for speaking their opinions? I know non-citizens can be deported for all kinds of reasons but don’t we as a country agree with free speech?
Posted on 9/30/25 at 5:40 pm to loogaroo
All you need to know...
quote:
In August, two members of the Supreme Court — Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh — rebuked Young for blocking the Trump administration’s decisions to cut off medical research grants it deemed related to diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives. The two Trump appointees said recent rulings on other grant-related cases on the high court’s emergency docket made clear Young’s ruling was impermissible.
“When this Court issues a decision, it constitutes a precedent that commands respect in lower courts,” Gorsuch wrote, joined by Kavanaugh.
Young later apologized, saying it wasn’t his intention to defy the Supreme Court, and he was simply unaware that the justices considered their emergency-docket rulings to be precedents lower courts are bound to follow.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 5:41 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
It probably doesn't... they are on one kind of visa or another that can be yanked at the discretion of the executive
Yep
Posted on 9/30/25 at 5:42 pm to loogaroo
See if you can spot the problem...
quote:
“The President’s palpable misunderstanding that the government simply cannot seek retribution for speech he disdains poses a great threat to Americans’ freedom of speech,” Young wrote, describing the courts as the most crucial bulwark to this threat.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 5:46 pm to loogaroo
Reagan absolutely fricked this country with illegals. Not a surprise
Posted on 9/30/25 at 5:49 pm to udtiger
quote:
See if you can spot the problem...
quote:
Young wrote, describing the courts as the most crucial bulwark to this threat.
Godlike complex.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 5:50 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
If you engage in wrongthink on certain subjects, this administration wants you gone.
I remember when it was only Christians and conservatives facing these government views.
Oh well.
Posted on 9/30/25 at 5:50 pm to loogaroo
quote:
quote:
See if you can spot the problem...
quote:
Young wrote, describing the courts as the most crucial bulwark to this threat.
Godlike complex
Close...
quote:
poses a great threat to Americans’ freedom of speech,
These
Aren't
Americans
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News