re: Another activist judge rules against deporting pro-Palestinian academics illegal

Two wrongs don't make a right brah....

My side is with the constitution and against the radical left and it seems against the retarded right.

quote:

---

This seems like a totally different conversation though. Investigating fraud is different than deporting them for saying something you don’t like

---

Not necessarily. If they were disqualified from receiving a visa due to knowing they were going to oppose the U.S. policy/government, then one could argue they shouldn’t have been granted a visa and are therefore subject to deportation. Again, very difficult to prove, but worth a decision in the courts I think.

quote:

---

Why though? Because they are saying stuff we don’t like? Even if there is a way to do this that is technically constitutional and under the authority of the executive, it seems like government overreach to me

---

You and others posted that these actions weren’t constitutional, I am only pointing out that this might be a situation where case law hasn’t decided.

Your proposal (would I agree if they were arguing something I agree with) is good on the surface. But what if said speech becomes helpful to our nation’s adversaries? Should speech used by a) someone who shouldn’t have been allowed here and b) provides our adversaries and advantage be grounds for deportation? I would think there are cases where it wouldn’t be a big deal, but I certainly can envision cases where it could be.

quote:

---

He does not have the authority. They are here illegally and they can chill in their home countries. They dont have any right to be here raising hell and he knows it.

---

In the 3rd paragraph of the story it states he didn’t change anything in the administration’s policy. He is probably going to look for precedent before his final ruling.

He wrote an opinion on how the policy infringes and is going to “strike fear” on free speech to noncitizens. He believes the “targeted deportation” is unconstitutional. He did not like the fact that the government got the names of individuals to be deported and the government was “taking cues from an anonymously run website.”

Supreme Court Justices don’t always agree, so they write a dissenting opinion. He can write his opinion and still give a final judgement in favor of the administration. It doesn’t matter who wins it’s going to be appealed. He know’s he’s just a stepping stone

quote:

---

But what if said speech becomes helpful to our nation’s adversaries? Should speech used by a) someone who shouldn’t have been allowed here and b) provides our adversaries and advantage be grounds for deportation?

---

I would say if someone is helping our adversaries then yes that’s grounds for deportation. I believe that’s why the executive has this power in the first place

quote:

---

161-page opinion

---

tldr

Nobody gives a frick about your opinion... all 161 pages of it