- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Analyst Says Judge Roy Moore Signature Inside Gloria Allred Accuser’s Yearbook Was FORGED
Posted on 11/14/17 at 12:05 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 11/14/17 at 12:05 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
As was already pointed out, yearbooks are distributed in the final weeks of the school year, yet this was signed in december of 1977? What the hell? Who has a yearbook in december?
I don't know about Bama that year but that is the same year my uncle graduated high school in Louisiana and there was an experiment in the education system going on with allowing Sr's who wanted to graduate early could go to school all day instead of half a day like most Sr's do because they only need a few classes to graduate, like myself only needed one my Sr year, and finish their workload for those classes that they still needed to complete and and if they completed the required workload they were allowed to graduate in December...
2
Posted on 11/14/17 at 12:05 pm to monceaux
quote:
Most people think "analyst" in this context would be a handwriting expert. Not a writer who is a Moore fan and apologist.
Kinda discredits the initial argument.
How about just look at the very clear writing differences and use your own brain power to make a logical deduction?
Or is that too tough for some of you to do? You want to make it about the credibility of the OP "analysis" rather than using your own freaking eyes?
Posted on 11/14/17 at 12:06 pm to BeefDawg
quote:
^^ The "M's" are overwhelmingly different.
my last name begins with a g. i don’t write the letter g the same way in text as i do in my signature.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 12:08 pm to LSURulzSEC
quote:
I don't know about Bama that year but that is the same year my uncle graduated high school in Louisiana and there was an experiment in the education system going on with allowing Sr's who wanted to graduate early could go to school all day instead of half a day like most Sr's do because they only need a few classes to graduate, like myself only needed one my Sr year, and finish their workload for those classes that they still needed to complete and and if they completed the required workload they were allowed to graduate in December...
I went to school with people who graduated early in December.
It had no bearing on the yearbooks. Everybody got theirs at the same time, some time in May.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 12:12 pm to wookalar1013
quote:
my last name begins with a g. i don’t write the letter g the same way in text as i do in my signature.
The "R's" are different.
The "7's" are different.
The "o's" are different.
The "y's" are different.
The supposed "Roy" looks like "Ray".
"Olde" is spelled wrong and the entire phrase is printed while everything else is cursive.
The signature is darker than the rest of the note.
He wasn't a D.A, he was the DDA.
But you go ahead and single out the "M's" with your little personal anecdote like a good little apologist idiot.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 12:14 pm to BeefDawg
quote:
But you go ahead and single out the "M's" with your little personal anecdote like a good little apologist idiot.
i’m replying directly to the post pointing out the differences in the m’s
settle down bevis
This post was edited on 11/14/17 at 12:19 pm
Posted on 11/14/17 at 12:15 pm to BBONDS25
quote:Wtf are you even talking about? That seems to be the standard he was applying. As if she couldn't possibly have her yearbook with her because she didn't get it that day.
Ian this the new standard? If it isn't impossible? Interesting. Won't go well for Hillary and Obama, though.
I can't believe people are melting so incredibly about a yearbook signature from a guy who doesn't deny he dated young girls. It's amazing to behold. And you somehow shoehorned Hillary and Obama into your analysis, as if I give a single frick or even know what you are referring to.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 12:19 pm to wookalar1013
quote:
i’m replying directly to the guy who pointed out the differences in the m’s
settle down bevis
Your reply had a purpose. The only possible purpose is to make an excuse so you can infer the note is legitimate.
So you're inferring legitimacy with a bullshite anecdote while ignoring the half-dozen other inconsistencies that contradict legitimacy.
So go eat a bag o dicks, retard.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 12:20 pm to BeefDawg
quote:
Your reply had a purpose. The only possible purpose is to make an excuse so you can infer the note is legitimate. So you're inferring legitimacy with a bullshite anecdote while ignoring the half-dozen other inconsistencies that contradict legitimacy. So go eat a bag o dicks, retard.
nothing of the sort.
you really need to relax.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 12:51 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
Jjdoc
Yet Sessions today said he has no reason to not believe the accusers.
You know it's bad when Sessions can't even defend the guy he'd like to take his seat.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 12:57 pm to marklsu
quote:
Yet Sessions today said he has no reason to not believe the accusers.
You know it's bad when Sessions can't even defend the guy he'd like to take his seat.
This is so intellectually dishonest.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 1:11 pm to moneyg
Has anyone claimed that the only person who wrote on the yearbook was Roy Moore? Or is the claim that Roy Moore signed it?
It appears like the baboons are comparing the signature to other things written on the page, which may have been written by other people. Handwriting comparison analysis requires other known samples, not just looking at the one page without several control samples.
Also, the argument that you can just look at it, and it is self proving, is magical thinking, dark ages stuff. It would support a self proving conclusion that the virgin Mary is actually the image on the window screen. “Just look at it and see it for yourself.” Just looking at it is projection of your own pathology.
If there was an actual handwriting analysis, we would at least see some indication of scientific method. Instead we get internet baboon poop flung around for parrots to repeat.
It appears like the baboons are comparing the signature to other things written on the page, which may have been written by other people. Handwriting comparison analysis requires other known samples, not just looking at the one page without several control samples.
Also, the argument that you can just look at it, and it is self proving, is magical thinking, dark ages stuff. It would support a self proving conclusion that the virgin Mary is actually the image on the window screen. “Just look at it and see it for yourself.” Just looking at it is projection of your own pathology.
If there was an actual handwriting analysis, we would at least see some indication of scientific method. Instead we get internet baboon poop flung around for parrots to repeat.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 1:13 pm to TBoy
quote:
If there was an actual handwriting analysis, we would at least see some indication of scientific method.
Which you would just dismiss, anyway, if it didn't turn out to your liking.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 1:17 pm to Jjdoc
Why does this analyst hate women?
Posted on 11/14/17 at 1:23 pm to Godfather1
quote:
Which you would just dismiss, anyway, if it didn't turn out to your liking.
Gee, I don’t know what an actual analysis would say. And neither do we all because this isn’t an analysis. And the monkeys in this thread are arguing nonsense like when yearbooks are distributed, as if that means anything
Posted on 11/14/17 at 2:27 pm to GumboPot
It may be a regional thing. I have certainly heard ADA's answer the query of what do you do as "I am a DA" which is different from saying I am the DA. The same as my best friend from law school who was a public defender for many years and was a PD in casual conversation but he wouldn't have said he was the Chief PD. I also think that much if not most of the public calls an ADA a DA. In the end, it is a matter of minutia IMO regarding the signature.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 2:30 pm to LSURulzSEC
quote:
I don't know about Bama that year but that is the same year my uncle graduated high school in Louisiana and there was an experiment in the education system going on with allowing Sr's who wanted to graduate early could go to school all day instead of half a day like most Sr's do because they only need a few classes to graduate, like myself only needed one my Sr year, and finish their workload for those classes that they still needed to complete and and if they completed the required workload they were allowed to graduate in December...
How many 16 year olds do you know that graduated early?
Posted on 11/14/17 at 2:41 pm to Jjdoc
Wow
Posted on 11/14/17 at 2:52 pm to Obtuse1
quote:
have certainly heard ADA's answer the query of what do you do as "I am a DA" which is different from saying I am the DA.
Have you seen them include either in their signature? Cause that's weird.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 2:57 pm to AUstar
quote:
And why are they bringing it to a local restaurant
Seriously!
That is the weirdest piece of this puzzle.
Page 4 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News