Analyst Says Judge Roy Moore Signature Inside Gloria Allred Accuser’s Yearbook Was FORGED

you even got red arrows in the clippings, impressed.

I believe the Moore accusers, but I am not sold on the yearbook at all.

As was already pointed out, yearbooks are distributed in the final weeks of the school year, yet this was signed in december of 1977? What the hell? Who has a yearbook in december?

quote:

---

I believe the Moore accusers, but I am not sold on the yearbook at all.

---

So you believe somebody that is presenting evidence that is a lie?


Makes sense.

quote:

---

I believe the Moore accusers,

---

It shouldn't be hard to verify when that yearbook was issued that year.

DAMN!

Even experts are calling bullshite

First, I honestly have serious doubts about this piece of evidence but if it were forensically examined it would probably be fairly easy to determine if it was written last week or many years ago.

The two issues I have with the analysis here are:

1. The signature exemplar used for comparison in the pictures is at least 20 years after the purported 1977 signature. That is a serious problem from an evidentiary point of view.

2. The Olde Hickory House and date potentially makes sense to have been added by the receiver to commemorate the date and place. Which also accounts for the duplicate date that is troubling for some. This reminds me of adding the date and place to the back of photographs which was still common in the late 70's.

As to the DDA vs DA issue I have known members of the DA's office to refer to their job as a DA in informal settings with non-lawyers as opposed to an ADA or DDA. This would be rather unusual for them to sign anything and only use DA though, even informally UNLESS it was meant simply to appear more powerful than they were. I have never known an ADA or DA to actually use ADA or DA in their signature. Most just sign their name as on documents it is printed below, I also only know (edit: very) few attorneys that ever sign ESQ or Esquire.

In the end from an evidentiary point of view one would want to exclude the chance it was written recently if it proves to be decades old then I am inclined to accept it on its face, though it is far from anything damning. Even if it was signed by him in 1977 it could have been a 14yo just asking for an autograph and she could even have had a crush on him particularly if she knew some of the older girls that dated him.

While I am not a Moore fan (and not an AL resident) I hate October/November surprises, it puts both the candidate and electorate in an untenable position.

Where is everyone to refute the analyst?

Keep begging Bitch

I agree. That is clearly a few different types of handwriting.

It’s funny people would believe that this could be real.