- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Amy Coney Barrett = Trump’s biggest mistake
Posted on 4/4/26 at 4:42 pm to burger bearcat
Posted on 4/4/26 at 4:42 pm to burger bearcat
So the OP is blaming the end of America on this one decision.
Not Clinton, Bush, Obama, Biden, 3 letter agencies, fraud, borders, illegals, wokeism, or anything else.
Not Clinton, Bush, Obama, Biden, 3 letter agencies, fraud, borders, illegals, wokeism, or anything else.
0
Posted on 4/4/26 at 4:47 pm to burger bearcat
Oh BS. Most of the time when she rules against Trump admin, it's on procedural matters. When it is actually the merits of the case, she usually rules in his favor. Guess you didn't notice how the other side completely hates her.
Posted on 4/4/26 at 4:51 pm to Champagne
quote:I think he also wants to see them success by their promotion. Probably because of Ivanka.
Trump has a weakness for women like Bondi and Barrett. He sees their physical attractiveness then over-estimates their actual value.
He fell for that boomer mindset of feminism, and that women can do whatever men can. Through in probably some guilt for being a pimp Daddy in his youth too.
It's a good hearted attempt, but naive.
Posted on 4/4/26 at 4:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
You are the hands down the most downvoted poster on the PB, and I think you take personal pride in being a fricked up liberal who can’t admit maybe you mighty be misguided. Your just another idiot that I laugh at
Posted on 4/4/26 at 5:06 pm to Doctor B
quote:
So how does this case apply to people not here lawfully?
This is the fruit of his dishonesty
Posted on 4/4/26 at 5:07 pm to ole man
A decision that could fix the way government fails to work.
Hold that the foreigner birthing industry is wrong and must be discontinued
Hold that individuals not in the birthing industry have a right to stay in country, but not participate in welfare programs or vote until Congress has developed specific requirements for birthright citizenship.
Hold that the foreigner birthing industry is wrong and must be discontinued
Hold that individuals not in the birthing industry have a right to stay in country, but not participate in welfare programs or vote until Congress has developed specific requirements for birthright citizenship.
Posted on 4/4/26 at 5:07 pm to soonerinlOUisiana
quote:
Please explain how anything that enables third world garbage to stain this country
Emotional argument that seems to justify making the Constitution a living document
quote:
You do realize the constitution is not a suicide pact, right counselor?
You do realize the Constitution can be amended?
Posted on 4/4/26 at 5:09 pm to deltaland
quote:
This is key. I believe birthright citizenship should apply to any legal resident here on a visa
Wong's parents were NOT here on a visa
Posted on 4/4/26 at 5:11 pm to ole man
quote:
and I think you take personal pride in being a fricked up liberal
Then you're retarded
I'm nothing close to a liberal
In fact I'm arguing against the court ruling on the case like liberals
Posted on 4/4/26 at 5:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Wong's parents were NOT here on a visa
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't WKA's parents be subject to the Chinese Exclusion Act and therefore never eligible to become citizens themselves? I'll wait for an answer before I go further.
Posted on 4/4/26 at 5:15 pm to Ingeniero
quote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't WKA's parents be subject to the Chinese Exclusion Act and therefore never eligible to become citizens themselves?
You are correct
Posted on 4/4/26 at 5:17 pm to Ingeniero
I think the CEA just meant the parents could not be naturalized at that time.
Posted on 4/4/26 at 5:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If our Supreme Court, especially the conservative voices on the court, adopt the living Constitution al analytical method and rule that Congress can effectively overrule the Constitution and carve out classes of persons that do not get to enjoy the protections and edicts of our constitution, then. Yeah, the second amendment is in trouble.
This notion that the only thing holding back the American Left from unleashing all sorts of progressive hell upon out country is certain Republican or Republican leaning branches/institutions/factions not “opening the door” for them to do so, seems to me one of the most ridiculous canards in modern politics.
Posted on 4/4/26 at 5:20 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
This notion that the only thing holding back the American Left from unleashing all sorts of progressive hell upon out country is certain Republican or Republican leaning branches/institutions/factions not “opening the door” for them to do so, seems to me one of the most ridiculous canards in modern politics.
If the non-Left is going to act like the Left, what's the difference in the two?
Posted on 4/4/26 at 5:21 pm to N.O. via West-Cal
quote:
I think the CEA just meant the parents could not be naturalized at that time
Right, but how does that jive with this board's current obsession with "gotta be here legally, permanently, and only citizens can give birth to citizens?" Although the solicitor general said they're not asking the court to overturn WKA, I'm meant to believe that Chinese who were legally barred from citizenship gave birth to a citizen, but someone who's here lawfully and temporarily can't?
Posted on 4/4/26 at 5:24 pm to N.O. via West-Cal
People that are here illegally by and large are fugitives from justice and subject to deportation upon arrest. They have broken the law to be here and their offspring should not be rewarded.
Most others here on temporary visas are by design to be returned home. Their offspring should not be awarded citizenship either.
People coming in here just long enough to have a child? That is foolish of us to allow that.
Most others here on temporary visas are by design to be returned home. Their offspring should not be awarded citizenship either.
People coming in here just long enough to have a child? That is foolish of us to allow that.
Posted on 4/4/26 at 5:25 pm to burger bearcat
This is a hard one……. So many shite decisions, it would be hard to pick just one.
Posted on 4/4/26 at 5:25 pm to burger bearcat
I think his presidency will be defined as “potential”, but a slight road bump of the status quo.
He really is awful at appointing people.
He really is awful at appointing people.
Posted on 4/4/26 at 5:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Emotional argument that seems to justify making the Constitution a living document
Dodge. Please explain how 3rd world scoff-laws and their spawn make this country better.
quote:
You do realize the Constitution can be amended?
Robert H. Jackson says “so frickin’ what?” Did you not study that case at Costco Law School, Frito?
Posted on 4/4/26 at 5:27 pm to Ingeniero
quote:Yup. Yet anohter example of the logic pretzle one has to assume to make the EO valid. You have to create an extra-judicial class for people here illegally, in order to exclude them from existing laws, so they can be handled outside of the 14A. If the admin wins, they won't be able to deport anyone and states won't be able to charge them with any crimes they commit. It will be an amazing piece of irony.
I'm meant to believe that Chinese who were legally barred from citizenship gave birth to a citizen, but someone who's here lawfully and temporarily can't?
Page 4 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News