Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Americans are more likely to see Harris’ gender as a hurdle than they were for Clinton

Posted on 9/26/24 at 3:49 pm
Posted by Major Dutch Schaefer
Location: Classified
Member since Nov 2011
39044 posts
Posted on 9/26/24 at 3:49 pm
LINK

quote:

Americans are more likely to believe that being a woman will hurt Kamala Harris ' chances in the November election, compared with eight years ago when Hillary Clinton was running. And they are more likely to believe that Donald Trump ‘s gender will help him.

A new poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research indicates a shift in attitudes among U.S. adults in the time between the candidacies of the first and second female major-party nominees.

About 4 in 10 Americans think Harris’ gender will hurt her chances of getting elected this fall. During the 2016 campaign, about 3 in 10 said the same about Clinton’s gender.

The shift in attitudes is largely driven by Democrats — particularly Democratic men. About 3 in 10 Democratic men thought Clinton’s gender would hurt her “somewhat” or “a lot” prior to her loss to Trump. About half now say that about Harris.


quote:

Democratic women have also grown more likely to say being a woman could be a hurdle for a presidential candidate: About 4 in 10 Democratic women said Clinton’s gender would hurt her, and about half say that about Harris now. Republican men only shifted slightly, and Republican women’s views remained stable.

Americans are also more likely to see Trump’s gender as something that will help his chances of being elected. About 4 in 10 U.S. adults now say that being a man is something that will help him, up from around 3 in 10 when the same question was asked in an AP-NORC poll during his 2016 campaign.
Posted by SelaTiger
Member since Aug 2016
21838 posts
Posted on 9/26/24 at 3:50 pm to
Because at least Clinton is intelligent. It cannot be denied she is much smarter than Kamala.
This post was edited on 9/26/24 at 3:50 pm
Posted by Purple Spoon
Hoth
Member since Feb 2005
20887 posts
Posted on 9/26/24 at 3:53 pm to
What setting are they asking these questions and to what soft arse "men" are giving these responses.?


The type of person that would validate this question by answering it is more likely to give the answer that they are framing.

In other words. These polls are bullshite.
Posted by Jwho77
cyperspace
Member since Sep 2003
84316 posts
Posted on 9/26/24 at 3:54 pm to
Clinton was smarter, more experienced, more known and not considered a Marxist. Kamala also fails the credible leader test.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
177370 posts
Posted on 9/26/24 at 3:56 pm to
Hillary is a bitch but she's undeniably smart and evil and would have known how to be President.

Kamala is just a dumbass puppet.. and a bitch.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
117591 posts
Posted on 9/26/24 at 3:58 pm to
They each have a strange quirk when being interviewed. Kamala has the cackling laugh. Hillary has the drugged out nodding her head up and down while the interviewer is talking. She looks like a mule.
Posted by tiger91
In my own little world
Member since Nov 2005
40230 posts
Posted on 9/26/24 at 4:08 pm to
I’m a woman. I’d vote for a woman.

IF it was the right one and if u felt that she was best for the job.
Posted by SouthernHog
Arkansas
Member since Jul 2016
7313 posts
Posted on 9/26/24 at 4:11 pm to
It’s not because she’s a woman, it’s because she’s a psychopathic communist.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram