- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Americans are more likely to see Harris’ gender as a hurdle than they were for Clinton
Posted on 9/26/24 at 3:49 pm
Posted on 9/26/24 at 3:49 pm
LINK
quote:
Americans are more likely to believe that being a woman will hurt Kamala Harris ' chances in the November election, compared with eight years ago when Hillary Clinton was running. And they are more likely to believe that Donald Trump ‘s gender will help him.
A new poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research indicates a shift in attitudes among U.S. adults in the time between the candidacies of the first and second female major-party nominees.
About 4 in 10 Americans think Harris’ gender will hurt her chances of getting elected this fall. During the 2016 campaign, about 3 in 10 said the same about Clinton’s gender.
The shift in attitudes is largely driven by Democrats — particularly Democratic men. About 3 in 10 Democratic men thought Clinton’s gender would hurt her “somewhat” or “a lot” prior to her loss to Trump. About half now say that about Harris.
quote:
Democratic women have also grown more likely to say being a woman could be a hurdle for a presidential candidate: About 4 in 10 Democratic women said Clinton’s gender would hurt her, and about half say that about Harris now. Republican men only shifted slightly, and Republican women’s views remained stable.
Americans are also more likely to see Trump’s gender as something that will help his chances of being elected. About 4 in 10 U.S. adults now say that being a man is something that will help him, up from around 3 in 10 when the same question was asked in an AP-NORC poll during his 2016 campaign.
Posted on 9/26/24 at 3:50 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Because at least Clinton is intelligent. It cannot be denied she is much smarter than Kamala.
This post was edited on 9/26/24 at 3:50 pm
Posted on 9/26/24 at 3:53 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
What setting are they asking these questions and to what soft arse "men" are giving these responses.?
The type of person that would validate this question by answering it is more likely to give the answer that they are framing.
In other words. These polls are bullshite.
The type of person that would validate this question by answering it is more likely to give the answer that they are framing.
In other words. These polls are bullshite.
Posted on 9/26/24 at 3:54 pm to SelaTiger
Clinton was smarter, more experienced, more known and not considered a Marxist. Kamala also fails the credible leader test.
Posted on 9/26/24 at 3:56 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Hillary is a bitch but she's undeniably smart and evil and would have known how to be President.
Kamala is just a dumbass puppet.. and a bitch.
Kamala is just a dumbass puppet.. and a bitch.
Posted on 9/26/24 at 3:58 pm to The Boat
They each have a strange quirk when being interviewed. Kamala has the cackling laugh. Hillary has the drugged out nodding her head up and down while the interviewer is talking. She looks like a mule.
Posted on 9/26/24 at 4:08 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
I’m a woman. I’d vote for a woman.
IF it was the right one and if u felt that she was best for the job.
IF it was the right one and if u felt that she was best for the job.
Posted on 9/26/24 at 4:11 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
It’s not because she’s a woman, it’s because she’s a psychopathic communist.
Popular
Back to top

5








