Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Amazon data center linked to cancer and miscarriages

Posted on 11/30/25 at 9:27 pm
Posted by Barkbowwow
Member since Nov 2025
100 posts
Posted on 11/30/25 at 9:27 pm
LINK

Good luck to the folks in the parishes getting those damn data centers.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
79200 posts
Posted on 11/30/25 at 9:31 pm to
Just clumps of cells according to Amazon.
Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
23076 posts
Posted on 11/30/25 at 9:32 pm to
This post was edited on 11/30/25 at 9:36 pm
Posted by StrangeBrew
Salvation Army-Thanks Obama
Member since May 2009
18330 posts
Posted on 11/30/25 at 9:34 pm to
It is truly amazing that as soon as something becomes successful it is found to be cancer causing!
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
17756 posts
Posted on 11/30/25 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

It is truly amazing that as soon as something becomes successful it is found to be cancer causing!


It is truly amazing that as soon as something becomes successful and is found to be cancer causing, we will do whatever it takes to maintain the status quo.

Soon, there will be a cancer center to "manage" it and Bezos or Zuckerberg will be named Chairman of the American Cancer Society.

No worries.
This post was edited on 12/1/25 at 8:18 am
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
42533 posts
Posted on 11/30/25 at 9:52 pm to
Small price to pay for free shipping and rings of power!
Posted by LSU Grad Alabama Fan
369 Cardboard Box Lane
Member since Nov 2019
13916 posts
Posted on 11/30/25 at 10:01 pm to
I will say it wasn't the data centers since it's Flint, Michigan and Flint, Michigan is known cancer.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170683 posts
Posted on 11/30/25 at 10:09 pm to
This is why I'm against loosening EPA regulations
Posted by Jimbeaux
Member since Sep 2003
21347 posts
Posted on 11/30/25 at 11:02 pm to
A bot account posting about an activist’s article in a pseudo-journal sure can get some of you to bite down hard on that treble hook.
Posted by Pax Regis
Alabama
Member since Sep 2007
14867 posts
Posted on 11/30/25 at 11:56 pm to
How is that even possible? It’s just a bunch of computers.
Posted by IMSA_Fan
Member since Jul 2024
569 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 5:15 am to
If you read the article it’s not solely the data centers. It’s the data centers mixed with the toxins that get in the water from farming practices.

quote:

Basically, the allegations go like this: industrial megafarms operating in the area are responsible for churning out millions of gallons of wastewater, laden with nitrates from fertilizers. All that waste has to go somewhere, which is one way of saying it mostly ends up in the ground. Amazon’s hulking data center, thirsty for water to cool its blazing hot computer chips, supercharged this process, adding millions of gallons of wastewater a year to the heavy volume of farm runoff, which Morrow County was already struggling to keep up with. Soon even the deepest reaches of the local aquifer were tainted, according to RS, as huge volumes of data center and agricultural wastewater saturated the water
Posted by W2NOMO
Member since Jul 2025
1618 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 5:19 am to
But I’ve seen the META commercials. They’re supposed to save rural American farming towns and Friday night football!
Posted by Bama Mountain
Member since Oct 2025
961 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 5:30 am to
quote:

It is truly amazing that as soon as something becomes successful it is found to be cancer causing!


Data centers have been around for decades. It seems the issue in this case is industrial farms pumping out nitrates, not datacenters.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
57916 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 5:54 am to
quote:

If you read the article it’s not solely the data centers. It’s the data centers mixed with the toxins that get in the water from farming practices.


I read the article and -maybe I need to re-read it after I finish my coffee- I don't see how the data centers are causing this, at least not from the story.

The problem is coming from the nitrate concentration in the aquifer being too high. The nitrates come from farmers fertilizing their fields.

The article doesn't elaborate on how the data center is responsible for the excess nitrates getting into the aquifer but somehow it's the data center's fault.
Posted by UptownJoeBrown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2024
7330 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 5:57 am to
Great. Louisiana expanded our Cancer Alley footprint.

Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
52192 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 6:00 am to
quote:

How is that even possible? It’s just a bunch of computers.

It’s probably not possible, and it is almost certainly a coincidence. Data centers are fairly benign. There are no weird chemicals. It’s just a lot of electrical power and fiber optics. It’s not causing cancer.
Posted by DMAN1968
Member since Apr 2019
12606 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 6:19 am to
quote:

violated the federal limit for nitrates in drinking water.
quote:

industrial megafarms operating in the area are responsible for churning out millions of gallons of wastewater, laden with nitrates from fertilizers.

Doh!

quote:

had his voice box taken out because of a cancer that only smokers get

Yeah...no.

Click bait bullshite article.
Posted by TigerSprings
Southeast LA
Member since Jan 2019
2376 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 8:13 am to
quote:

EPA regulations


It actually what causes this.

There is a ban on once through cooling tower water. This means the nitrates concentrate in the cooling tower after the several rounds of recirculation with losses mostly coming from evaporation which leave the nitrates behind. The relatively small blowdown from the cooling tower will be packed full of nitrates, much higher than drinking water limits would allow. Nitrates are probably not part of the cooling tower discharge limits because this process does not create the nitrates in the first place.

The ban for once through is not stupid because it uses enormous amounts of water, but recirculation is what is causing this.

Amazon might never have tried to "once through" but the less they recirculate/higher blowdown, the lower the nitrate concentration will be. It will tax the water supply though.
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
16289 posts
Posted on 12/1/25 at 9:01 am to
quote:

The historical precedent here is Flint, Michigan."


Didn’t read a single word after that sentence after the headline.

People….. don’t download the programming.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram