- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: All this talk about 47 "shredding the constitution" yet no specific examples...
Posted on 4/16/25 at 9:05 am to funnystuff
Posted on 4/16/25 at 9:05 am to funnystuff
quote:
And the correct punishment for an illegal alien who did exactly what he was instructed to do by the President of the United States is not a literal lifetime of torture.
A literal lifetime of torture?
Don't be so dramatic. It causes rational people to turn off on your argument.
He was an El Salvadoran citizen returned to his own country. What happens there is not the responsibility or jurisdiction of the USA.
If he didn't want a "literal lifetime of torture," then he shouldn't have broken the law.
Why do you give illegals more due process than citizens? Where was the due process for citizens who didn't want millions of violent welfare leeches destroying their communities?
You people care about illegal aliens more than your own citizens. GFY.
0
Posted on 4/16/25 at 9:05 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Is that really the hill you want to die on?
Why are we dying on hills? I thought we were just talking here.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 9:06 am to Barstools
quote:
You're one of those retards that doesn't understand expelling someone from our country under the AEA is by definition, due process. It is also constitutional per the USSC. What are you on about?
Miller is trying to dramatically move the goalposts after the fact by gaslighting his base. It's hysterical.
Even kinda looks like him
Posted on 4/16/25 at 9:08 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There's a HUGE gap between "asking once with a wink" and "kidnapping" him.
Just admit there is little legal requirements of what "facilitate" means and "how hard Trump has to try" to make YOU personally feel better,
Posted on 4/16/25 at 9:09 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If that removal violated the law, yes.
His arrival here violated the law. I'm OK with correcting the blatant law breaking by both Biden and the illegal alien.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 9:09 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No. That's absurd.
There's a HUGE gap between "asking once with a wink" and "kidnapping" him.
Speculation
Posted on 4/16/25 at 9:10 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
So he's just Bukele's bitch because?
Or maybe they are on the same page behind the scenes and the public comments are part of their agreement. Maybe, just maybe they both agree he is currently exactly where he should be.
He was a criminal residing in the US illegally. His current situation is the result of HIM not doing it the right way, Hard stop.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 9:12 am to riccoar
quote:
w. I'm OK with correcting the blatant law breaking by both Biden and the illegal alien.
Then you are "shredding the constitution" and giving OP an answer to his question.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 9:13 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Has Trump cancelled the agreement with Bukele in response?
Have you seen how Trump handles other defiant actors? China in the tariff scenario? Or how about this resopnse after their moves agains the AP led to another loss in court?
So he's just Bukele's bitch because?
Trump has complied completely with the ruling. Trump was in the room when Bukele said he would not be releasing the ms13 gang member.
Just because libtarded children are wanting President Trump to do more is no reason. Do you think it is a good idea to give into tantrums by adult sized people who are acting like children? children?
Posted on 4/16/25 at 9:14 am to Dock Holiday
quote:
Or maybe they are on the same page behind the scenes and the public comments are part of their agreement. Maybe, just maybe they both agree he is currently exactly where he should be.
Yeah that's literally my argument.
Another interpretation is hard to have using logical analysis.
The alternative is Trump admitting he's Bukele's bitch, which is clearly absurd. If he's going to stand up to the most powerful nations on Earth, he's not going to be a bitch to one of the least powerful
quote:
He was a criminal residing in the US illegally. His current situation is the result of HIM not doing it the right way, Hard stop.
That can all be true and still doesn't absolve the admin of their illegal beahivor.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 9:15 am to geoag58
quote:
tantrums
Posted on 4/16/25 at 9:16 am to SlowFlowPro
Your profile pic is exactly how I would picture your face 
Nothing but a punchable face 
Nothing but a punchable face Posted on 4/16/25 at 9:19 am to SlowFlowPro
You lefties do have a thing for criminal felons.
You are going to have to speed up if you are trying to have George Floyd 2.0 with this ms13 dog by summertime.
You are going to have to speed up if you are trying to have George Floyd 2.0 with this ms13 dog by summertime.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 9:20 am to kajuntiga
quote:
Your profile pic is exactly how I would picture your face Nothing but a punchable face
Posted on 4/16/25 at 9:21 am to geoag58
quote:
You lefties
quote:
do have a thing for criminal felons.
The testing of our constitutional law isn't typically done by people acting properly, and it's almost exclusively determined with cases involving unsavory figures.
Your attempt at emotional arguments is noted.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 9:21 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
doesn't absolve the admin of their illegal beahivor.
You still have no sound evidence to support this opinion if illegal behavior.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 9:27 am to Dock Holiday
quote:
You still have no sound evidence to support this opinion if illegal behavior.
It's not my opinion. It's the Supreme Court's
quote:
The rest of the District Court’s order remains in effect but requires clarification on remand. The order properly requires the Government to “facilitate” Abrego Garcia’s release from custody in El Salvador and to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador.
Bolded for your edification.
Improper = not following the law = illegal.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 9:30 am to SlowFlowPro
The testing of our constitution is a feature not a bug.
Your side lost this one. Time for the left to crawl back under their slimy dark rock and come up with a new scheme to destroy our country.
Your side lost this one. Time for the left to crawl back under their slimy dark rock and come up with a new scheme to destroy our country.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 9:31 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Then you are "shredding the constitution"
No, I'm OK with the POTUS correctly enforcing current laws that were broken by the previous administration to get us into this situation.
Trump didn't create this, Democrats did. Their inaction to blatant law breaking makes them just as complicit in the matter.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 9:37 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You realize that trial was a lot more due process than the due process involved with immigration/expulsion, right?
I guess you didn't do enough research before white knighting for a gang criminal to know that he's already had deportation orders from two different federal courts.
Page 7 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News