- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: All this talk about 47 "shredding the constitution" yet no specific examples...
Posted on 4/16/25 at 8:07 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 4/16/25 at 8:07 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't recall one being so bold, but it's always bad.
Of course it is. All 3 branches would love to be able to do things without the other two interfering. Only 1 branch actually has that much power and they abuse it just like presidents do.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 8:09 am to lake chuck fan
quote:Fixed it for you.
Bukeli stated in the press conference he can not return the guy
And the fix really gives the game away. The idea that this is something outside of everyone’s control - that Bukele can’t do anything about it, that Trump can’t do anything about it, that it’s just a magic vortex of perpetual confinement with no possible recourse in existence - is just obvious nonsense. And you all know it is.
What happened is the administration fricked up, accidentally sending your garden variety illegal to one of the worst places in the world instead of just correctly deporting them. Knowing that it’s one of the worst places in the world, they understand that if they bring this person back, his story is going to skull frick the administration’s deportation plans as this dude’s horror story from inside the cell will become blasted across every single media platform, left right and center alike. Unwilling to accept that consequence of their own mistake, they’re instead opting to keep this man in a torture chamber for the rest of his life.
You know it, I know it, we all know it. It’s obvious and right there in front of us. Which makes the number of y’all who appear to be perfectly comfortable pretending like we’re just these weak little victims of circumstance outside of anyone’s control really pitiful. This is a choice the administration has made. Defend the choice on its merits or get out of the conversation. This nonsense that there’s just nothing weak little old innocent us is able to do is patently stupid.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 8:09 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
directed Trump to facilitate return
Can you define "facilitate his return" ? Be specific in the actions you think the administration HAS to take.
Keep in mind the administration will do the absolute minimum because they have the moral high ground here and it's not debatable.
It's an illegal alien that was returned to his place of birth. You want to come to the US, do it LEGALLY and you won't be in this situation.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 8:11 am to Flats
Gridlock used to be the preferred method of keeping govt at bay at one point on this board. Now the majority seem to want unabated power.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 8:11 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Requires the government to facilitate his release. What have they done to do so?
Met with the President of El Salvador in the WH. This was one of the topics discussed. Bukele then advised he would not release Garcia.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 8:13 am to Cobbvol
quote:
Met with the President of El Salvador in the WH. This was one of the topics discussed. Bukele then advised he would not release Garcia.
As professor Maraist would say, "that dog won't hunt"
Posted on 4/16/25 at 8:13 am to funnystuff
quote:
He appears to be pretty directly and unequivocally ignoring a 9-0 supreme court order. That’s not just norms or standards, that’s something significant.
Please give specific examples of how he is ignoring a 9-0 Supreme Court order (notice you capitalize that bro).
Posted on 4/16/25 at 8:13 am to funnystuff
quote:
He appears to be pretty directly and unequivocally ignoring a 9-0 supreme court order. That’s not just norms or standards, that’s something significant.
You understand the non citizen who was deported was wanted in his native nation?
You understand that nation has laws and that he’s being held there under those laws?
You understand that short of a potential military invasion we cannot compel them to give the Salvadorian man back?
It’s no different than an American felon being deported from France, then taken to American an American prison to face charges here and then France changing their mind on a legal technicality and wanted him back.
The answer then would be the same as the answer now: no.
If the federal courts want him back they can go to El Salvador and attempt to take him back themselves, otherwise they can F off because it’s out of our and their jurisdiction at this point and no constitutional laws have been broken or even bent.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 8:13 am to Barstools
quote:
Uhm, but if you read the ruling it says exactly what SM said it does. How do you reconcile that?
This is just more of the same "Trump's goal is whatever the outcome is, and will be decided retroactively" nonsense. Totally intellectually dishonest and bad faith.
Most everyone outside the far right plainly sees that, hence, so funny.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 8:14 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Are you really arguing Trump is that much of a powerless pussy? He is so weak he couldn't negotiate the return? Is that really the hill you want to die on?
He did ask President Bukele and he said no……so what now?
Posted on 4/16/25 at 8:15 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What have they done to do so?
What can they do??? The president of El Salvador said he will not return him.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 8:15 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The USSC just had a 9-0 ruling...
Once again please give specific examples of how he is ignoring that ruling?
Posted on 4/16/25 at 8:15 am to funnystuff
quote:
The right punishment is deportation. Deportation and torture are not the same thing. We have chosen the latter. And it’s a fricked up thing to do.
what happens when someone is deported to other countries? Are they released back into the population or held in jail? IDK the process but in this case, and any other illegal immigrant, I don't really care what happens to them when they are deported.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 8:18 am to PsychTiger
Constitutional crisis! Such dramatic little bitches



This post was edited on 4/16/25 at 8:21 am
Posted on 4/16/25 at 8:18 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
As professor Maraist would say, "that dog won't hunt"
Of course what I posted is all factual.
Doing what you want would probably lead to some quid pro quo allegation in an article by The Atlantic and another Colonel Vindman arising.
My advice for you to stick to fishing and avoid hunting.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 8:19 am to Dock Holiday
quote:
Can you define "facilitate his return" ?
Exactly. To "facilitate " his return would be something like, if El Salvador chose to return the guy, Trump would send a plane and pick him up.
THAT would be considered "facilitating ".
quote:
Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages
verb
make (an action or process) easy or easier
Posted on 4/16/25 at 8:22 am to lake chuck fan
quote:
What can they do??? The president of El Salvador said he will not return him.
If Bukele is drying Trump, then the rational response of the admin would be to pull the prisoners we paid him to hold and return them to the US, and end the program. That would test the sincerity if the admin.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 8:23 am to Cobbvol
quote:
Of course what I posted is all factual.
Factual? Sure
It shows the admin isn't working towards the goal they were given and their sincerity in following the order.
You can put lipstick on a pig all you want, but it's still a pig at the end of the day.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 8:24 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Are you really arguing Trump is that much of a powerless pussy? He is so weak he couldn't negotiate the return? Is that really the hill you want to die on?
So you want him to negotiate to achieve something that he doesn’t want?
That’s dumb.
I’ve said from day one that he should fly his own jet down there, treat the “father of the year” like a king on the return flight, and then process his arse upon landing.
Then, fly him back to El Salvador with some quickness, and without ANY comfort in mind.
Posted on 4/16/25 at 8:24 am to Topwater Trout
quote:I appreciate you being honest about that. That’s the single biggest thing that feels like it’s missing from the conversation from those defending the policy right now, so I’m grateful that you’re willing to be honest about it. I do think that correctly identifies a demarcation point where we can both understand why we fall on different sides of being for/against this policy.
I don't really care what happens to them when they are deported.
In this particular case, the reason the individual is being held in a torture jail rather than being released into the general population is because we paid El Salvador $6,000,000 to jail these illegals. Without that payment, my belief is that this individual would have been released into the population, not sent to prison.
I’m perfectly fine paying that fee for actual MS13 members to be jailed. frick them.
But I’d rather your regular garden variety illegal just be deported without the accompanying torture contract being included. I believe that particular punishment to be worse than the original crime committed.
Popular
Back to top
