- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: AG Merrick Garland to give a briefing at 1:30 CT
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:14 pm to the808bass
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:14 pm to the808bass
quote:
Wait a second. How can they do this without endangering national security?
The former president cant be allowed to have this top secret information, but the New York Times, sure AF can!
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:14 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Absolutely wrong.
Really? Who from the FBI or the DOJ said, "The warrant was based on fraud."
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:14 pm to PaperTiger
quote:This makes everything worse.
Shannon Bream "we really learned a whole lot of nothing today"

Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:14 pm to Lsut81
Maybe he told Biden, but Joe just forgot, and fell asleep in his chair.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:14 pm to Lsut81
quote:
If he filed to unseal, Trump should release now.
I understood it that he was alluding to the filing to unseal. The DOJ has to respond to the FOIA made by Judicial Watch by 5 pm Monday.
I'm pretty sure Trump's copy of the warrant does not have the sealed information that gave the courts the justification to issue the warrant. That's what the FOIA request is for.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:14 pm to the808bass
quote:
How can they do this without endangering national security?
I thought some of this stuff was so classified that it could not even be described....
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:15 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Oh and the fbi already admitted the info in the affidavit was fraudulent.
excuse me. I'd like to hear more about this because if so, then the whole fricking exercise is illegal.
but, of course, they did the same thing to the FISA court, so no biggie, right?
This post was edited on 8/11/22 at 2:17 pm
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:15 pm to TigerFanatic99
quote:
said it was very narrowly scoped as well.
That why they spent 9 hours in Melania's closet when the safe was the supposed target.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:15 pm to jonnyanony
quote:
Aren't they defacto sealed via court order? I'm pretty sure that's how it works with DOJ just like a grand jury.
I guess so. It just sounds odd coming from the people currently doing everything on this. I suppose it's mostly a formality thing.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:15 pm to jonnyanony
quote:
thought the judge was the first one to request they get unsealed.
This is fact. Magestrate gave DOJ days to release
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:15 pm to GumboPot
quote:
I'm pretty sure Trump's copy of the warrant does not have the sealed information that gave the courts the justification to issue the warrant. That's what the FOIA request is for.
Yep. Whatever Trump's team has is limited in scope. We need the whole thing.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:15 pm to The Maj
quote:
I thought some of this stuff was so classified that it could not even be described....
Apparently all the stuff at MAL was declassified by Trump before he left the WH.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:16 pm to TBoy
why are you playing these stupid little detail games?
you know this is bullshite. you know this is all political and extremely dangerous for everyone's future. this is soviet union level shite. stop defending it.
you know this is bullshite. you know this is all political and extremely dangerous for everyone's future. this is soviet union level shite. stop defending it.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:16 pm to TrumpedUpVol
quote:
He's still big mad about the Supreme Court
Absolutely…that’s why I said he should not be in a position to handle anything dealing with Trump or Trump as just being a Republican. Smacks of payback. It gives the appearance of being vindictive.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:16 pm to TBoy
quote:
I'm certain no one has admitted anything of the kind.
Then you would be wrong. The fbi said the informant told them the documents would be in the safe and that’s what they put in the affidavit. After the raid they admitted nothing of interest was found in the safe. Do you need me to connect the dots for you?
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:16 pm to TBoy
quote:
Really? Who from the FBI or the DOJ said, "The warrant was based on fraud."
Newdflash. Your heroes don't tell you when they frick up.
They need you to keep believing.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:16 pm to Paddyshack
Will Trumps team fight the unsealing of the warrant?
Probably
Probably
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:17 pm to udtiger
quote:
excuse me. I'd like to hear more about this because if so, then the whole fricking exercise is illegal.
It’s all based on rumors. But the rumor is that a confidential informant in Trump’s camp told them where some of the classified documents were. Namely, in the safe. But the safe was empty. Ipso facto, the informant was wrong.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:17 pm to GumboPot
Weren’t there pictures of bins removed from MAL ? Way more than 16 boxes and one clear bin looked like it had a baseball bat in it.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:17 pm to PaperTiger
quote:
It's on Trump's legal team now. Does he release the warrant?
The warrant won't tell us anything we don't already know.
Popular
Back to top
