Started By
Message

After $100M Cornyn mistake, stop fighting the base and start passing Trump's agena

Posted on 5/30/26 at 4:43 am
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
140537 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 4:43 am
quote:

The Washington Times

$100 million Cornyn mistake backfires in Texas
Party insiders should stop fighting the base and start passing Trump's agenda

By Kelly Sadler
May 28, 2026


The Republican establishment burned through more than $100 million in its bid to defeat Ken Paxton in Texas’ GOP Senate primary — only to find out sometimes money is not enough.

The state’s senior senator, John Cornyn, was the preferred choice of party insiders and donors, who spent about $128 million worth of ads as of Monday evening in his direction, according to the media tracking firm AdImpact

But all of that money and effort was for naught, as Mr. Paxton, the state’s attorney general, blew out Mr. Cornyn by more than 25 points in Tuesday’s election.

It was the most expensive Senate primary in history, and one of the biggest mistakes of party insiders. Now, the national coffers are depleted for GOP candidates seeking to win in Maine, Ohio, Iowa, North Carolina, Alaska and Georgia.

The worst part? Mr. Cornyn’s defeat was highly predictable more than a year ago, but instead of listening to its base voters, the Republican establishment decided to buck them, blowing through the party’s cash.
...

If there are any lessons to be learned, it’s for Senate Republicans to return next week, cancel some of their planned vacation time and pass a reconciliation bill, which includes funding for Mr. Trump’s ballroom and the SAVE America Act, which will secure American elections.

Instead, The New York Times reports, GOP senators are bitter at Mr. Cornyn’s loss, viewing Mr. Trump’s endorsement of Mr. Paxton “as a move to punish a senator whom Mr. Trump deemed insufficiently loyal, an insult to the institution and a self-serving political mistake that put his party’s hold on the Senate at risk.”
...

That’s clearly the wrong read on the situation. GOP voters want senators who do their bidding, not the other way around. Mr. Paxton was on the trajectory to win the primary with or without Mr. Trump’s endorsement. Mr. Paxton will also win the general in November as his Democratic opponent, James Talarico, is far from palatable for Lone Star State voters.
...

Now, it’s time for senators to do the people’s bidding — or they, too, will face ouster.

LINK
Posted by OccamsStubble
Member since Aug 2019
10402 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 6:04 am to
quote:

$100 million Cornyn mistake backfires in Texas Party insiders should stop fighting the base and start passing Trump's agenda


“No. We waited him out before and we’ll wait him out again. Besides, he’s folded on our neocon wishes and is throwing printed cash at Ukraine and Iran (and therefore at us). But thanks for your attention in this matter”

R Party
Posted by HagaDaga
Member since Oct 2020
8522 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 6:23 am to
Didn't Paxton spend less than 5m on the primary? That should have mentioned in the article
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
17492 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 6:29 am to
I respect the Washington Times and agree or disagree, their editorials are usually good (even if I disagree I can respect their viewpoint), but this is just silly. The Senators are NOT supposed to be like European Members of Parliament who just mindlessly vote "in line with leadership". That completely knocks the famous "checks and balances" role they play and does not make them a co-equal branch of government. The "just shuf your mouths and do what your betters at the White House tell you" has never been a part of the US system. That is the system in the House of Commons in the UK, all the other European parliaments, etc.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
111487 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 6:38 am to
quote:

The Senators are NOT supposed to be like European Members of Parliament who just mindlessly vote "in line with leadership". That completely knocks the famous "checks and balances" role they play and does not make them a co-equal branch of government.


Obviously HIS CONSTITUENTS wanted him to do something else.

The “checks and balances” function of the legislative branch, does not mean ignoring the wills of your voters.
Posted by cadillacattack
the ATL
Member since May 2020
11137 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 6:39 am to

Repeal the 17th Amendment …..

Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
11760 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 6:44 am to
quote:

Eurocat


Did Cornyn get checked or did he get balanced?

The Democrats vote in lockstep. Cornyn got praise from leftists like you.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
116523 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 6:49 am to
quote:

Obviously HIS CONSTITUENTS wanted him to do something else.

The “checks and balances” function of the legislative branch, does not mean ignoring the wills of your voters.


Exactly.
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
42125 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 7:36 am to
quote:

but this is just silly. The Senators are NOT supposed to be like European Members of Parliament who just mindlessly vote "in line with leadership". That completely knocks the famous "checks and balances" role they play and


They need to be like that
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
52399 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 7:38 am to
Reminds me of how I felt when back in 2015 the campaign of Jeb Bush had amassed a war chest of $115M. The establishment candidate, confidently puffed out his chest and beamed, thinking money would win the primary and telling Trump he couldn't insult his way to the presidency.

How'd that work out, Jeb?

The will of the people.



*side note: why do the Republican Senators get such a huge funding to support 'their guy'? When it's Republican vs. Republican, the whole point should be to preserve the will of the people and save that for the general election. Same thing happened to Eric Cantor. Lots of GOP money behind him.

The then current, but retiring speaker was John Boehner. For the GOPe, Cantor was their guy, widely expected to succeed John Boehner (who seemed near an emotional breakdown as speaker) and who had planned to step down by the end of the year so that the House could make a smooth transition with an already sitting House Majority Leader (Cantor) sliding over into the 2nd in line to the presidency.

But the Tea Party, a precursor to MAGA, kicked Cantor to the curb.

That's a big deal. Speakers not only run half of Congress — they stand next in line to be president after the vice president. Cantor's loss makes him the first majority leader to lose renomination since the office was created in 1899.
This post was edited on 5/30/26 at 8:02 am
Posted by NashvilleTider
Your Mom
Member since Jan 2007
15898 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 7:50 am to
Trump got all these guys elected they absolutely should vote for his agenda.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
57015 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 7:50 am to
quote:

he’s folded on our neocon wishes and is throwing printed cash at Ukraine and Iran

He’s not throwing cash at Ukraine. I thought that the only money we are sending their way is money that was previously appropriated and for which Trump has no choice. Is more money being appropriated?
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
24735 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 7:53 am to
Maybe it is time to follow the money regarding the insanity of contributing so much to Cornyn's campaign. Why else would they spend so much?
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
57015 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 7:53 am to
quote:

The Senators are NOT supposed to be like European Members of Parliament who just mindlessly vote "in line with leadership". That completely knocks the famous "checks and balances" role they play and does not make them a co-equal branch of government. The "just shuf your mouths and do what your betters at the White House tell you" has never been a part of the US system.

Yeah, but neither are the senators supposed to do whatever the hell they want. They are supposed to be somewhat responsive to the voters, and that’s exactly what elections are for. The voters made it very clear in this primary election that they want to go in a different direction.

Your post makes it seem like US senators should be like the House of Lords.
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
26495 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 8:09 am to
quote:

The "just shuf your mouths and do what your betters at the White House tell you"

Ad usual, you missed the point; and instead regurgitated your own emotional liberal narrative. The point was that Cornyn was not representing the will of the voters. We want them to pass Trump’s agenda.
Posted by geoag58
Member since Nov 2011
2285 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 8:21 am to
Who are these twenty(?) or so A-holes who think they are more important than the will of the people. These F's need to be kicked to the curb!
Posted by tarzana
TX Hwy 6-- the Brazos River Valley
Member since Sep 2015
32572 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 8:28 am to
quote:

stop fighting the base and start passing Trump's agena

Because the majority of America isn't the Trump Base. Most Americans prefer that our resources and young men and women are not deployed to the Gulf to fight Netanyahu's Zionist apocalyptic wars, or pay escalating prices for gas and for groceries, merchandise and services, or be assailed with the constant litany of lies from OMB. That is not who we are as Americans
Posted by Lou Pai
Member since Dec 2014
29636 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 8:29 am to
quote:

I respect the Washington Times and agree or disagree, their editorials are usually good (even if I disagree I can respect their viewpoint), but this is just silly. The Senators are NOT supposed to be like European Members of Parliament who just mindlessly vote "in line with leadership". That completely knocks the famous "checks and balances" role they play and does not make them a co-equal branch of government. The "just shuf your mouths and do what your betters at the White House tell you" has never been a part of the US system. That is the system in the House of Commons in the UK, all the other European parliaments, etc.


Agreed. Also, I’m not going to read the editorial, but I assume it has to do with blowing up the filibuster and passing the SAVE Act. That’s how you not only lose your republic, that’s how you further debase the Senate as an important institution in our constitutional order. I know no one gives a shite about any of that any more though.
This post was edited on 5/30/26 at 8:31 am
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
99301 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 8:32 am to
quote:

Because the majority of America isn't the Trump Base. Most Americans prefer that our resources and young men and women are not deployed to the Gulf to fight Netanyahu's Zionist apocalyptic wars, or pay escalating prices for gas and for groceries, merchandise and services, or be assailed with the constant litany of lies from OMB. That is not who we are as Americans


Our young men and women arent doing anything in the ME. Clown post
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
27256 posts
Posted on 5/30/26 at 8:34 am to
The 17th should be repealed with the only difference being to provide a mechanism for breaking deadlocks in the state appointment process. Punting it to a state wide popular vote was a lazy and foolish fix.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram