re: Admin included two pictures of Trump in Epstein files, then deleted them

That can easily be how someone tries to extort someone that they tried to get into a “blackmail situation” that didn’t pan out like the rest of the Epstein Extortion & Blackmail “marks”

It was an entire sting operation to gain leverage on high powered folks and maybe just maybe some didn’t partake in the Debauchery that was going on.

I’m sure there are many that eventually were “introduced” to “what could happen if you eat the fruit at Eden’s Garden”, but for some, it went too far.

Not giving Trump a pass, and I’m sure he had a stage of “liking them young”, but when it comes to Alpha Males trying to make your escalation info the big game, he’s had so many side angles of blackmail come at him. And when your the ALPHA DOG, you don’t need a SPECIAL ISLAND to have fun.

And I think the entire circle that’s at the top, you’ve got to tightline rope walk the fence in those circles.

Trump didn’t need an Epstein to be his “Call Service” like a Bill Gates or Bill Clinton that we can all agree has/had a Sex Driven Mental Illness.

Just like Anthony Weiner.

These people are sick & I don’t think Trump fits into that “sex addict at any means possible BOX”

So the way it plays out, they are on their last stand, and against the wall. So they show some pics that they think may incriminate and intimidate Trump & it’s a game of chicken.

And now that he rose to power, they have one last game to play and see if he blinks.

The fact that this loser is still allowed to post here is a discredit to tigerdroppings. RIP LucasP

quote:

---

The girls in that photo were in their mid twenties.

---

Yeah, but, but, were any of them election specialists from Russia? Or just good old American, Mid 20's erection specialists?

quote:

---

There are over 100 completely black, fully-redacted pages. What do you mean “nothing has been withheld”? Did your mom do whippets when she was pregnant with you?

---

The Epstein disclosure law requires this numbnuts.

Edit to add the specific provisions requiring redactions since the Reddit crowd wants to traffic in misinformation:

quote:

---

c) Permitted Withholdings.— (1) The Attorney general may withhold or redact the segregable portions of records that— (A) contain personally identifiable information of victims or victims’ personal and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy; (B) depict or contain child sexual abuse materials (CSAM) as defined under 18 U.S.C. 2256 and prohibited under 18 U.S.C. 2252–2252A; (C) would jeopardize an active federal investigation or ongoing prosecution, provided that such withholding is narrowly tailored and temporary; (D) depict or contain images of death, physical abuse, or injury of any person; or (E) contain information specifically authorized under criteria established by an Executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy and are in fact properly classified pursuant to such Executive order.

---

Please provide your evidence, eunuch.

There is more to this Trump Epstein stuff than meets the files pulled eyes. Donald is very concerned about any perception of a connection between he and Epstein. It’s strange.

Very

quote:

---

You mean the part where the prosecutor is on public record saying how Trump was one of, if not the, most helpful to them?

---

Of course he was. Trump was the one who turned him in. Funny how that happens when you claim to not know what was going on with Epstein.
Obviously Trump knew, they had a decade-long friendship. Of course he knew.
The friendship ended only after they fought over a piece of foreclosed beachfront property in which Trump went behind Epstein's back (no pun intended) to outbid him for it and make 10s of millions in the process.
Then when Epstein tried to "recruit" an underage girl from Mar-a-Lago, that was the last straw.
To believe Trump didn't know what Epstein was up to is laughable.
As for Trump participating in it, that's debatable. But their decade-long friendship makes Trump look mighty suspicious.

quote:

---

Repeating a fake story multiple times doesn’t make it true.

---

No. But Deputy AG Blanche confirming it does make it true.


The removal reportedly came at the request of victim advocacy groups. If those were alleged victims, this is the right move because faces were not redacted. We will probably hear more about this.

quote:

---

Blanche on Sunday said that the removal has “nothing to do” with the president and came at the request of victim advocacy groups. “We don’t have perfect information,” Blanche told Welker. “And so when, when we hear from victims-rights groups about this type of photograph, we pull it down and investigate. We’re still investigating that photo. The photo will go back up, and the only question is whether there will be redactions on the photo.”

---

LINK