- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Actual rebuttal of Cassidy Hutchinson testimony
Posted on 7/3/22 at 4:02 pm
Posted on 7/3/22 at 4:02 pm
I know those of us with a working brain knew this was stupid, I still like to have options for our retarded friends here to dispute.
This is a 12 minute breakdown from a former Secret Service Agent on every detail of the Trump Grand Theft Auto claim.
My favorite part is the whole "no one in the SS or the WH actually calls the Presidential Limo "The Beast."
Which ironically isn't even the vehicle Trump was in, but don't let me get in the way of y'all that believe this stupid shite.
Dan Bongino
This is a 12 minute breakdown from a former Secret Service Agent on every detail of the Trump Grand Theft Auto claim.
My favorite part is the whole "no one in the SS or the WH actually calls the Presidential Limo "The Beast."
Which ironically isn't even the vehicle Trump was in, but don't let me get in the way of y'all that believe this stupid shite.
Dan Bongino
7
Posted on 7/3/22 at 4:11 pm to Jax Teller
There’s ample opportunity for anyone to step forward under oath and dispute her testimony. Until they do her testimony will be deemed credible. Hearsay from so called defenders is useless.
Posted on 7/3/22 at 4:15 pm to Jax Teller
Nobody, and I mean nobody, cares about this Jan 6 circus TV show hearing. The left is paying people off to lie and make it headline worthy
Posted on 7/3/22 at 4:15 pm to Jax Teller
quote:Your favorite part should be the whole no one who is in the SS and was present was actually called to testify.
My favorite part is the whole "no one in the SS or the WH actually calls the Presidential Limo "The Beast."
Posted on 7/3/22 at 4:17 pm to Clark14
quote:
There’s ample opportunity for anyone to step forward under oath and dispute her testimony. Until they do her testimony will be deemed credible. Hearsay from so called defenders is useless.
SS members aren't civilians. They are Federal agents. There is a process required for that. Hopefully that is granted to them, because they have offered to go under oath and testimony. We'll see, but in the meantime you'll just have to use your brain.
Posted on 7/3/22 at 4:17 pm to Clark14
quote:
Until they do her testimony will be deemed credible. Hearsay from so called defenders is useless.
You realize that her entire testimony related to this event was hearsay, right?
Posted on 7/3/22 at 4:18 pm to Clark14
quote:
step forward under oath and dispute her testimony
Is that how that works? They just need to walk up to the committee doors and demand to be put under oath while saying they plan on refuting her testimony?
Yes...I'll await with baited breath as the committee ensures this happens ASAP.
Posted on 7/3/22 at 4:21 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Your favorite part should be the whole no one who is in the SS and was present was actually called to testify.
This isn't an adversarial trial. That would require cross examination and a jury to decide on facts given dual testimony. They aren't going to do that, because they know they are making it up. Oh and plus CONGRESS CAN'T CONDUCT CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS. They can only carry out investigations regarding legislative matters, but I'll wait for you to tell me what legislative matter this involves. Why else would they have all of this one sided "testimony?" You actually believe a person can be found guilty just because someone says something about them and there is no allowance of cross examination?
I swear some of you are fricking retarded.
This post was edited on 7/3/22 at 4:24 pm
Posted on 7/3/22 at 5:05 pm to Clark14
quote:she never gave a testimony because she wasn't there. Every word she uttered was hearsay.
There’s ample opportunity for anyone to step forward under oath and dispute her testimony. Until they do her testimony will be deemed credible. Hearsay from so called defenders is useless.
Posted on 7/3/22 at 5:08 pm to Clark14
quote:
There’s ample opportunity for anyone to step forward under oath and dispute her testimony if any of the committee would actually send them a summons for a rebuttal testimony
Posted on 7/3/22 at 5:10 pm to Clark14
quote:
There’s ample opportunity for anyone to step forward under oath and dispute her testimony. Until they do her testimony will be deemed credible. Hearsay from so called defenders is useless.
Well. You're an idiot.
Posted on 7/3/22 at 5:19 pm to Clark14
quote:
Hearsay from so called defenders is useless.
Amazing irony.
Posted on 7/3/22 at 5:21 pm to Jax Teller
Bongino has been talking about the absurdity of that bitches testimony all week. He has the facts, and it struck a nerve with him being a former agent
Posted on 7/3/22 at 5:24 pm to Clark14
quote:
There’s ample opportunity for anyone to step forward under oath and dispute her testimony. Until they do her testimony will be deemed credible
So the ‘fact finding’ committee will be calling these witnesses to get to the facts, right?
Posted on 7/3/22 at 5:25 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
Until they do her testimony will be deemed credible. Hearsay from so called defenders is useless.
quote:
You realize that her entire testimony related to this event was hearsay, right?
Evidently, her hearsay is (D)ifferent.
Posted on 7/3/22 at 5:36 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Well. I am an idiot.
I made the response in a thread on an off topic board and I guess they moved it to the brain dead trump lover board. Have you hung Mike pence yet, I haven’t kept up with that.
Posted on 7/3/22 at 5:37 pm to Clark14
quote:
I made the response in a thread on an off topic board and I guess they moved it to the brain dead trump lover board. Have you hung Mike pence yet, I haven’t kept up with that.
What does that have to do with the utter ignorance and irony of your OP?
Posted on 7/3/22 at 5:39 pm to Jax Teller
There would have been an opportunity to question her testimony but McCarthy refused to participate soo…looks like he made a dumb mistake
Posted on 7/3/22 at 5:43 pm to 850SaintsGator
Cheney said yesterday the most important job she has is to keep trump from becoming president again. That he is the biggest threat America faces. This is the chair of the committee tasked with investigation. Why would anyone testify in an admitted witch hunt? Why wouldn’t Pelosi let the republicans pick their own committee members? You know the answer to this. You just don’t care.
Posted on 7/3/22 at 5:43 pm to Clark14
quote:
There’s ample opportunity for anyone to step forward under oath and dispute her testimony. Until they do her testimony will be deemed credible. Hearsay from so called defenders is useless.
They won’t call any to “testify”! This is a third world kangaroo court and if you can’t see that you are part of the problem.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News