- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
ABC, NBC and CBS slap Trump with 92% negative coverage
Posted on 4/28/25 at 8:10 am
Posted on 4/28/25 at 8:10 am
Evening newscasts on ABC, NBC and CBS have slapped President Donald Trump with 92% negative coverage as the 100th day of his second term approaches, according to the Media Research Center (MRC).
The MRC analyzed ABC’s "World News Tonight," "NBC Nightly News" and "CBS Evening News" from January 20 through April 9 and found 899 stories that discussed President Trump or the Trump administration. The media watchdog group found that 92.2% of the coverage was negative compared to only 7.8% positive.
"Just 100 days into President Donald Trump’s second term, the broadcast evening news landscape is even more lopsided than it was eight years ago, when Trump was besieged with relentlessly hostile coverage," researcher Rich Noyes wrote.
"Eight years ago, using the identical methodology, we found Trump was blasted with 89% negative coverage at the hands of these networks during the first weeks of his first term," Noyes added.
The study revealed a stark contrast to coverage of former President Joe Biden’s first 100 days in office, which was 59% positive, according to the MRC.
"Yet despite the overwhelming negativity of their coverage, the networks found Trump irresistible as a news subject, at least compared with Biden. From January 20 through April 9, 2017, the networks saturated their newscasts with 1,900 minutes of Trump news; during the same time period this year, we tallied a massive 1,716 minutes of coverage. But in 2021, evening news viewers saw only 726 minutes of Biden coverage during these same weeks, less than half of the airtime devoted to either of the new Trump administrations," Noyes wrote.
The MRC explained that it determined the spin of coverage by tallying "all explicitly evaluative statements" about President Trump from either reporters, anchors or non-partisan sources such as experts or voters. Partisan sources, such as elected officials, were not included.
While Trump’s personal controversies dominated much of the coverage during his first term, the MRC found that coverage of the first 100 days of his second term has been largely spent on policy issues. Tariffs were covered for 361 minutes to lead the way, followed by DOGE receiving 301 minutes of coverage and immigration received 233 minutes of airtime on ABC, NBC and CBS’ evening newscasts, the study found.
"The networks’ spin on Trump’s tariffs faced 93% negative coverage, while the DOGE cutbacks to government were greeted by 97% negative spin," Noyes wrote when detailing the findings.
"Even on immigration, the issue where the public gives the President his highest ratings, the networks’ spin was 93% negative," he continued. "Out of nearly four hours of evening news airtime devoted to immigration, these newscasts spent just 3.5 minutes letting viewers know just how much Trump has reduced border crossings."
Trump’s top associates haven’t exactly received glowing coverage, either.
The study found that HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. faced 89% negative coverage, DOGE’s Elon Musk was hit with 96% negative coverage, and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth received a unanimous 100% bad press from ABC, NBC and CBS evening newscasts.
ABC, NBC and CBS did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
LINK
The MRC analyzed ABC’s "World News Tonight," "NBC Nightly News" and "CBS Evening News" from January 20 through April 9 and found 899 stories that discussed President Trump or the Trump administration. The media watchdog group found that 92.2% of the coverage was negative compared to only 7.8% positive.
"Just 100 days into President Donald Trump’s second term, the broadcast evening news landscape is even more lopsided than it was eight years ago, when Trump was besieged with relentlessly hostile coverage," researcher Rich Noyes wrote.
"Eight years ago, using the identical methodology, we found Trump was blasted with 89% negative coverage at the hands of these networks during the first weeks of his first term," Noyes added.
The study revealed a stark contrast to coverage of former President Joe Biden’s first 100 days in office, which was 59% positive, according to the MRC.
"Yet despite the overwhelming negativity of their coverage, the networks found Trump irresistible as a news subject, at least compared with Biden. From January 20 through April 9, 2017, the networks saturated their newscasts with 1,900 minutes of Trump news; during the same time period this year, we tallied a massive 1,716 minutes of coverage. But in 2021, evening news viewers saw only 726 minutes of Biden coverage during these same weeks, less than half of the airtime devoted to either of the new Trump administrations," Noyes wrote.
The MRC explained that it determined the spin of coverage by tallying "all explicitly evaluative statements" about President Trump from either reporters, anchors or non-partisan sources such as experts or voters. Partisan sources, such as elected officials, were not included.
While Trump’s personal controversies dominated much of the coverage during his first term, the MRC found that coverage of the first 100 days of his second term has been largely spent on policy issues. Tariffs were covered for 361 minutes to lead the way, followed by DOGE receiving 301 minutes of coverage and immigration received 233 minutes of airtime on ABC, NBC and CBS’ evening newscasts, the study found.
"The networks’ spin on Trump’s tariffs faced 93% negative coverage, while the DOGE cutbacks to government were greeted by 97% negative spin," Noyes wrote when detailing the findings.
"Even on immigration, the issue where the public gives the President his highest ratings, the networks’ spin was 93% negative," he continued. "Out of nearly four hours of evening news airtime devoted to immigration, these newscasts spent just 3.5 minutes letting viewers know just how much Trump has reduced border crossings."
Trump’s top associates haven’t exactly received glowing coverage, either.
The study found that HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. faced 89% negative coverage, DOGE’s Elon Musk was hit with 96% negative coverage, and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth received a unanimous 100% bad press from ABC, NBC and CBS evening newscasts.
ABC, NBC and CBS did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
LINK
Posted on 4/28/25 at 8:10 am to FLTech
Zero respect for the office
Posted on 4/28/25 at 8:12 am to FLTech
quote:
have slapped President Donald Trump with 92% negative coverage
So, business as usual.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 8:13 am to FLTech
They should go back and rate Trump, RFK, and Elon BEFORE the media turned on them and I bet those numbers almost perfectly inverse
Posted on 4/28/25 at 8:14 am to FLTech
CNBC has been on fire with fake news negative
The money board is eating it up
The money board is eating it up
Posted on 4/28/25 at 8:15 am to FLTech
Every day yahoo is full of negative Trump stories as their main storylines. A bunch of the stories are lies
Posted on 4/28/25 at 8:15 am to FLTech
Unfortunately, the National Debt has become so alarmingly high that Democrat's other strategy, vote for me get free stuff! is no longer appealing.
Hating & opposing Trump is all that they have left at this point
Hating & opposing Trump is all that they have left at this point
Posted on 4/28/25 at 8:15 am to TrueTiger
Only 92% negative? They are getting soft
Posted on 4/28/25 at 8:16 am to SDVTiger
I just wish they would be 50/50 - at least report news that’s good and also call out democrats
This post was edited on 4/28/25 at 8:17 am
Posted on 4/28/25 at 8:16 am to FLTech
That's going to win over Trump voters in 2028.
Bold strategy cotton; definition of insanity yadda yadda...

Bold strategy cotton; definition of insanity yadda yadda...
Posted on 4/28/25 at 8:18 am to The Torch
quote:Yet incredible respect for it and the man occupying during the last administration - so much the MSM should be named as co-conspirators for fraudulently defending a brain dead man as the leader of the free world.
Zero respect for the office
Posted on 4/28/25 at 8:19 am to FLTech
They need to be called what they are : Democrat News Networks.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 8:20 am to TrueTiger
quote:
So, business as usual.
Might actually be an improvement
Posted on 4/28/25 at 8:24 am to FLTech
And you honestly expect the propaganda arm of the DNC to be fair and balanced to their political rivals?
Posted on 4/28/25 at 8:31 am to FLTech
92% negative coverage, then push poll public opinion, then “report” Trumps falling popularity. Wash, rinse, repeat.
fricking hate the media and starting to hate those who fall for their BS.
fricking hate the media and starting to hate those who fall for their BS.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 8:32 am to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
Only 92% negative? They are getting soft
I only use the internet, but I almost never see any positive coverage, or even non-committal, on legacy media sites (other than Fox occasionally). Even the article above has a potential slant. They cite Trump's 92% negative rating vs Biden's 59% positive over their first 100 days. What was Biden's negative number? Did either of them have any "informational" coverage that had no obvious positive or negative slant. I'm guessing Biden got plenty of that and Trump almost none.
You don't even have to agree with Trump to know media coverage is nonsensical. The fact that they handled Biden (and Obama, Clinton, Harris, etc.) with kid gloves is all the evidence you need that legacy "journalism" is pure propaganda.
This post was edited on 4/28/25 at 8:44 am
Posted on 4/28/25 at 8:35 am to FLTech
A perfect example, I saw where CBS was running a story when Trump's tarriffs first went into effect, and they claimed it was the largest drop in the markets since the 1989 or some time frame like that. But when three weeks later the stock market was back above the original starting point from before the tariffs, not a single mention of the stock market is made.
All negative all the time, no mention of positive news. And yet they wonder why Trump routinely mocks them and the polls show that the American public doesn't trust them.
All negative all the time, no mention of positive news. And yet they wonder why Trump routinely mocks them and the polls show that the American public doesn't trust them.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 8:36 am to FLTech
The “chaos” is manufactured.
I don’t know how anyone still believes corporate media. I guess it’s similar to people staying in an abusive relationship.
I don’t know how anyone still believes corporate media. I guess it’s similar to people staying in an abusive relationship.
Posted on 4/28/25 at 8:37 am to FLTech
Only 92%? Trump must be slowly winning over some network execs. 

Popular
Back to top
