Started By
Message

re: 40% of all living veterans are on disability benefits

Posted on 7/13/26 at 9:52 am to
Posted by AgSGT
Dixon, MO
Member since Aug 2011
2138 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 9:52 am to
quote:

It has drastically increased


It has increased over the past couple of years because the VA finally recognized the serious health problems caused by toxic burn pits and the literal ponds of human waste we were forced to breathe around. That exposure damaged my thyroid and contributed to me needing a CPAP machine for the rest of my life. The law that expanded these benefits is called the PACT Act.
Posted by AgSGT
Dixon, MO
Member since Aug 2011
2138 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 9:53 am to
I'd guess most all during training and PT
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
19736 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 9:54 am to
I think it should only go to guys who's injuries were a result of hostile enemy fire. PTSD is real, but it too should only go to guys who saw combat.

If that becomes the criteria, then a lot of this would be cut out and most of these guys wouldn't qualify.

Posted by TheOtherWhiteMeat
Fort Smith
Member since Nov 2009
20727 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 10:10 am to
quote:

It has increased over the past couple of years because the VA finally recognized the serious health problems caused by toxic burn pits and the literal ponds of human waste we were forced to breathe around. That exposure damaged my thyroid and contributed to me needing a CPAP machine for the rest of my life. The law that expanded these benefits is called the PACT Act.


Correct. But the PACT Act gets abused by fraud "reps". The PACT Act includes those who served in an area that has poor air quality. Kuwait is one of those places due to the oil refineries. Oil refineries produce a lot of nitrogen dioxide, but that nitrogen dioxide stays pretty localized. However, when the winds blow, especially south and southwest, that nitrogen dioxide blows over Camp Arafjan and KNB. It's only brief, but it's enough to make the claim (and it's BS), and it's very hard to disprove.
The PACT Act was needed, but it left some loopholes that are getting exploited.
Posted by kj993
Georgia
Member since Mar 2018
543 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 10:12 am to
I do know a veteran who gets full disability benefits for sleep apnea.

Was never deployed.
This post was edited on 7/13/26 at 10:18 am
Posted by BuckeyeGoon
Member since Jan 2025
1323 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 10:15 am to
quote:

I think it should only go to guys who's injuries were a result of hostile enemy fire.

A good amount of the casualties and injuries in the recent US wars came from friendly fire, faulty equipment, accidents, etc, are you saying the government shouldn't be on the hook for those?
Posted by northshorebamaman
Mackinac Island
Member since Jul 2009
38498 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 10:18 am to
quote:

you have a 40% chance of $3500 per month in lifetime disability,
That's not what it says.
Posted by ThoUpOrange
Member since Feb 2014
216 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 10:19 am to
quote:

I do know a veteran who gets full disability benefits for sleep apnea.


I don't know what degree of benefits he gets, but I know a guy who gets them for sleep paralysis.
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
44694 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 10:21 am to
Just like everything else the gov’t subsidizes, you get more of it. Unfortunately, this is the third rail of American politics. You can’t touch anything military related and not be labeled ‘unAmerican’ or worse.
Posted by TideHater
Orange Beach AL
Member since May 2007
19929 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 10:22 am to
quote:

STFU, that's every job. These people didn't even see combat.


Please elaborate how you know this.

Otherwise it is just the most ignorant reply I have read in my history of TD.
Posted by TheOtherWhiteMeat
Fort Smith
Member since Nov 2009
20727 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 10:25 am to
quote:

That's not what it says.



Not at all, most disabled vets are drawing around the 40% mark. 18.45% get 100%. 17.3 get 10%. 5.69% get 50%. With about .50% getting 0%. Then the rest are those in the 30-40% area.

40% gets you $774 a month.
Posted by Pfft
Member since Jul 2014
5142 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 10:26 am to
The group of veterans i hang out with,talk about this openly. They all have some sort of imaginary disability. No shame or remorse in gaming the system for them.
They say almost everyone plays the game.
Posted by Great Plains Drifter
Flyover, U.S.A.
Member since Jul 2019
10497 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 10:26 am to
There may be some out there “taking advantage” as it were - but I can think of plenty of other avenues of fraud and abuse this country should easily being going after and addressing way before it would consider looking at veteran disability.

Seriously, all the shite we learn about on a weekly basis ….. and we’d be wanting to talk about our veterans before we’ve even remotely began to take care of all the other crap going on?
Posted by ClientNumber9
Member since Feb 2009
10174 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 10:27 am to
quote:

This is the third rail of US politics. You just can’t touch it


Agree. And it's complete bullshite. I'm a federal agent and I work with at least 5 dudes who are 100% disabled, making tax free bank. I ask them all the time- if you're 100% disabled, how are you kicking down doors with me twice a week? They laugh about it.
Posted by SparkyWilson
Member since May 2026
175 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 10:28 am to
so...what's your service record and what % disability did you qualify for?
Posted by ClientNumber9
Member since Feb 2009
10174 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 10:30 am to
DP
This post was edited on 7/13/26 at 10:31 am
Posted by northshorebamaman
Mackinac Island
Member since Jul 2009
38498 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 10:31 am to
quote:



Less than one year of "service" to the military and guess what - 100% disability and $4K/month........
Something is missing in this story. A fractured hip doesn't rate 100% and if the crash was caused by his own intoxication, the injury would be classified as willful misconduct and would not qualify for service-connected compensation.

If this is true you should report him for fraud.
Posted by SparkyWilson
Member since May 2026
175 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 10:32 am to
quote:

Agree. And it's complete bullshite. I'm a federal agent and I work with at least 5 dudes who are 100% disabled, making tax free bank. I ask them all the time- if you're 100% disabled, how are you kicking down doors with me twice a week? They laugh about it.


Disability is really the wrong word for it; medical compensation is a better term.

Not that that makes the situation you describe any better. I'd be really curious what they qualified for.
Posted by TheOtherWhiteMeat
Fort Smith
Member since Nov 2009
20727 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 10:34 am to
quote:

the injury would be classified as willful misconduct and would not qualify for service-connected compensation.


Correct. I know a guy that shot himself in the foot, he was fricking around and literally aimed at his foot and fired. He claimed he didn't know the weapon was loaded (how the hell do you not know it's loaded?). Anyway, denied.
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
46938 posts
Posted on 7/13/26 at 10:36 am to
Yeah they try and get disability for everything. Tried to claim everything was from Agent Orange
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 30
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 30Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram