- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 3.2 Million people over the age of 120 have been removed from Social Security Benefits
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:57 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:57 am to SlowFlowPro
This is your exact quote
So your position is, without any evidence, that out of 3.2M individual #s that were removed from the system that not a single one of them ever improperly received money. And you wonder why you are the clown of the this board.
quote:
There weren't any.
So your position is, without any evidence, that out of 3.2M individual #s that were removed from the system that not a single one of them ever improperly received money. And you wonder why you are the clown of the this board.
This post was edited on 3/18/25 at 9:58 am
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:04 am to theunknownknight
quote:
theunknownknight
You learned to code.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:05 am to TigerB8
I hope they are chasing down where these payments went for prosecution.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:10 am to Warboo
quote:
Checks werent being sent out for these people
Link?
I don't know if checks went out, but operationally, SSA has an operational policy to not pay benefits to anyone over 115. SSA Manual
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:14 am to TigerB8
I wonder how the database handles an old dude who marries a younger woman, and she continues to draw a survivor benefit.
If a 90 year old married a 40 year old and she continued to draw the spouses benefit how does the database handle that? Can some of these really aged examples be explained by legitimate explanations?
If a 90 year old married a 40 year old and she continued to draw the spouses benefit how does the database handle that? Can some of these really aged examples be explained by legitimate explanations?
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:32 am to BlackAdam
There was the one dude who kept his dead mom in a freezer collecting her SS for years. There must be some sort of way they find these people.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:37 am to BlackAdam
quote:
90 is a magic number where they are suppose to begin efforts to contact the recipients to ensure they are still alive
I think the 40 year old would be flagged for benefits and upon death, the 90 year old would have their death flag updated. Prior to 1972, there were about 6.2 M numbers issued so that spouses could get benefits. See IG Report
Back in 2023, the IG found 18.9 million database records that were not flagged as dead and had not reported earnings in over 50 years. They had reported a records issue on date of death back in 2015. SSA had not take action if they didn't have proof of death and did not consider it a priority as:
(1) They didn't have record of benefits; and
(2) Cost to fix in 2015 was about 9MM
SSA has known about the problem for awhile, but hasn't fixed it.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:38 am to RohanGonzales
quote:
How incompetent has our government been?
I think it’s more corruption than incompetence….
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:38 am to seedmonster77
quote:
There must be some sort of way they find these people.
They supposedly will cross reference Medicare databases and create a presumption of death if there have been no claims in 5 years. Not sure how they caught this freak though.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:45 am to POTUS2024
quote:
I was thinking the purge might facilitate fraud. You now have millions of numbers available for new, fabricated claims.
This is stupid. Social Security numbers are not recycled. Once the number has been purged, it cannot be used again by some new person.
We have not reached a billion social security numbers since its inception and will figure that out once we get there.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:51 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Doge Literally isnt saving anything
Let’s assume not a single one of these has received a check. At least it was checked and verified and that my friend is how it is supposed to work.
If one is not checking this basic function then a lot of other things are not getting checked and lord knows how much money is being lost.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:55 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Doge Literally isnt saving anything- SFP
If each one of these corrected listings received one letter a year, that in and of itself is saving in postage in the millions. All this nonsense adds up.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:04 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Doge Literally isnt saving anything
In a material sense related to the federal budget, this is an accurate statement.
DOGE is not about efficiency but rather it is a guise to go after Trump and Elon's enemies.
Keep coping tho.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:15 am to jclem11
quote:
DOGE is not about efficiency but rather it is a guise to go after Trump and Elon's enemies.
Keep coping tho.
So you are ok with politicians embezzling trillions of tax payer dollars. You don't care about social security benefits being scammed? You don't have a problem with sitting judges relatives being on a NGO staff that receives millions from USAID? You are ok with them sucking your country dry, and giving billions to illegals who the spent billions more flying them into the country under the cover of darkness?
Some how you feeble minded people can't see that theft is illegal regardless of what team the cash goes to. Hopefully you experience the full effects that come when your marxists collapse America.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:22 am to lake chuck fan
quote:
Well.... That's a start, now prosecute whomever has been receiving those payments.
Doubt anyone is getting checks, but having a social security number could be useful to authenticate someone registering to vote.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:23 am to jclem11
quote:
a guise to go after Trump and Elon's enemies.
oh bullshite
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:23 am to Vacherie Saint
It is bad for democrats. Imagine how many of those are registered democrat voters.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:26 am to TigerB8
Not lets wait and see how many call to complain they didn't receive their check they have been getting fraudulently..... and implicate themselves....
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:28 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Where were the 3.2 million checks going
There weren't any. Title of thread is misleading
Yes the certainly were not anywhere near 3.2 million checks going out. But you damn sure don't know that it was zero either.
The most certain win in the purge is to prevent voter fraud.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:31 am to theunknownknight
quote:Well, yeah. Quick and easy. Yet, for +/- 20 years not one single Administration has seen fit to have even attempt to complete this simple task in an attempt to maintain the rosters. Why?
Literally a 2 second job
UPDATE demo
SET DOD = CAST(getdate() AS DATE)
Where DOB <= DATEADD(YEAR, -120, GETDATE())
/the end
Popular
Back to top



0




