Started By
Message

re: 3.2 Million people over the age of 120 have been removed from Social Security Benefits

Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:57 am to
Posted by DawgCountry
Great State of GA
Member since Sep 2012
32429 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:57 am to
This is your exact quote

quote:

There weren't any.


So your position is, without any evidence, that out of 3.2M individual #s that were removed from the system that not a single one of them ever improperly received money. And you wonder why you are the clown of the this board.
This post was edited on 3/18/25 at 9:58 am
Posted by BozemanTiger
Member since Jul 2020
4524 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:04 am to
quote:

theunknownknight




You learned to code.
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
23902 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:05 am to
I hope they are chasing down where these payments went for prosecution.
Posted by dukkbill
Member since Aug 2012
1041 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:10 am to
quote:

Checks werent being sent out for these people


Link?


I don't know if checks went out, but operationally, SSA has an operational policy to not pay benefits to anyone over 115. SSA Manual
Posted by BlackAdam
Member since Jan 2016
7050 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:14 am to
I wonder how the database handles an old dude who marries a younger woman, and she continues to draw a survivor benefit.

If a 90 year old married a 40 year old and she continued to draw the spouses benefit how does the database handle that? Can some of these really aged examples be explained by legitimate explanations?
Posted by seedmonster77
Member since Feb 2025
203 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:32 am to
There was the one dude who kept his dead mom in a freezer collecting her SS for years. There must be some sort of way they find these people.
Posted by dukkbill
Member since Aug 2012
1041 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:37 am to
quote:

90 is a magic number where they are suppose to begin efforts to contact the recipients to ensure they are still alive


I think the 40 year old would be flagged for benefits and upon death, the 90 year old would have their death flag updated. Prior to 1972, there were about 6.2 M numbers issued so that spouses could get benefits. See IG Report

Back in 2023, the IG found 18.9 million database records that were not flagged as dead and had not reported earnings in over 50 years. They had reported a records issue on date of death back in 2015. SSA had not take action if they didn't have proof of death and did not consider it a priority as:

(1) They didn't have record of benefits; and
(2) Cost to fix in 2015 was about 9MM

SSA has known about the problem for awhile, but hasn't fixed it.
Posted by HoopsAurora
Member since Apr 2024
1880 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:38 am to
quote:

How incompetent has our government been?


I think it’s more corruption than incompetence….
Posted by dukkbill
Member since Aug 2012
1041 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:38 am to
quote:

There must be some sort of way they find these people.


They supposedly will cross reference Medicare databases and create a presumption of death if there have been no claims in 5 years. Not sure how they caught this freak though.
Posted by PeleofAnalytics
Member since Jun 2021
4931 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:45 am to
quote:

I was thinking the purge might facilitate fraud. You now have millions of numbers available for new, fabricated claims.


This is stupid. Social Security numbers are not recycled. Once the number has been purged, it cannot be used again by some new person.

We have not reached a billion social security numbers since its inception and will figure that out once we get there.

Posted by BHM
Member since Jun 2012
3858 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:51 am to
quote:

Doge Literally isnt saving anything



Let’s assume not a single one of these has received a check. At least it was checked and verified and that my friend is how it is supposed to work.

If one is not checking this basic function then a lot of other things are not getting checked and lord knows how much money is being lost.
Posted by winkchance
St. George, LA
Member since Jul 2016
6165 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:55 am to
quote:

Doge Literally isnt saving anything- SFP


If each one of these corrected listings received one letter a year, that in and of itself is saving in postage in the millions. All this nonsense adds up.
Posted by jclem11
Chief Nihilist
Member since Nov 2011
9583 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:04 am to
quote:

Doge Literally isnt saving anything


In a material sense related to the federal budget, this is an accurate statement.

DOGE is not about efficiency but rather it is a guise to go after Trump and Elon's enemies.

Keep coping tho.
Posted by TigerB8
End Communism
Member since Oct 2003
10859 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:15 am to
quote:

DOGE is not about efficiency but rather it is a guise to go after Trump and Elon's enemies.

Keep coping tho.


So you are ok with politicians embezzling trillions of tax payer dollars. You don't care about social security benefits being scammed? You don't have a problem with sitting judges relatives being on a NGO staff that receives millions from USAID? You are ok with them sucking your country dry, and giving billions to illegals who the spent billions more flying them into the country under the cover of darkness?

Some how you feeble minded people can't see that theft is illegal regardless of what team the cash goes to. Hopefully you experience the full effects that come when your marxists collapse America.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
48132 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:22 am to
quote:

Well.... That's a start, now prosecute whomever has been receiving those payments.

Doubt anyone is getting checks, but having a social security number could be useful to authenticate someone registering to vote.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
48132 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:23 am to
quote:

a guise to go after Trump and Elon's enemies.

oh bullshite
Posted by RollTide4547
Member since Dec 2024
3582 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:23 am to
It is bad for democrats. Imagine how many of those are registered democrat voters.
Posted by tigeraddict
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
14429 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:26 am to
Not lets wait and see how many call to complain they didn't receive their check they have been getting fraudulently..... and implicate themselves....
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
26327 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:28 am to
quote:

Where were the 3.2 million checks going

There weren't any. Title of thread is misleading


Yes the certainly were not anywhere near 3.2 million checks going out. But you damn sure don't know that it was zero either.

The most certain win in the purge is to prevent voter fraud.
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
31674 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:31 am to
quote:

Literally a 2 second job

UPDATE demo
SET DOD = CAST(getdate() AS DATE)
Where DOB <= DATEADD(YEAR, -120, GETDATE())

/the end
Well, yeah. Quick and easy. Yet, for +/- 20 years not one single Administration has seen fit to have even attempt to complete this simple task in an attempt to maintain the rosters. Why?
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram