- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2000 Mules Fact Checking
Posted on 5/12/22 at 8:37 am
Posted on 5/12/22 at 8:37 am
Read 6 Fact Checking articles from news papers across the US.
As I expected, the lack of the movie to directly tie it all together with even one person or show one person going to different boxes on video and their cell path leads to it all just being speculation or assumption…without a single person or org identified. Having only one whistleblower and no names didn’t do any favors. In fact, it allowed the issue to be easily written off.
I think they were close but pulled the trigger too soon. Hopefully, the data dump they say is coming has something more substantial, but feels like this is where every big gotcha ends up.
Denver Post example
As I expected, the lack of the movie to directly tie it all together with even one person or show one person going to different boxes on video and their cell path leads to it all just being speculation or assumption…without a single person or org identified. Having only one whistleblower and no names didn’t do any favors. In fact, it allowed the issue to be easily written off.
I think they were close but pulled the trigger too soon. Hopefully, the data dump they say is coming has something more substantial, but feels like this is where every big gotcha ends up.
Denver Post example
This post was edited on 5/12/22 at 8:38 am
37
Posted on 5/12/22 at 8:43 am to RealDawg
quote:At this point we have to assume that this doesn't exist. Pretty clear they looked for it and it would be in the movie if they could find it.
the lack of the movie to directly tie it all together with even one person or show one person going to different boxes on video and their cell path
Posted on 5/12/22 at 8:45 am to mmcgrath
I tend to agree. The claims they made were very compelling. But this was the opportunity to share your most damning evidence. Why not show the same person at multiple drops? Why not show these non-profits. I eagerly await the data drops to see if they are in there.
Posted on 5/12/22 at 8:49 am to RealDawg
I haven't seen the movie yet but what would be the explanation for a person's cell phone being within close proximity of 20+ drop boxes in one night?
Posted on 5/12/22 at 8:51 am to McChowder
quote:
I haven't seen the movie yet but what would be the explanation for a person's cell phone being within close proximity of 20+ drop boxes in one night?
The problem is there is no meat behind it. They showed a path on a screen, they claim it was from a single mule. That's all well and good, very compelling. Give me a name. Lets hold these people accountable, get them on video, ask some questions. Hell anything.
Posted on 5/12/22 at 8:54 am to RealDawg
quote:
allowed the issue to be easily written off.
You only easily write off the 2020 election fraud if you’re a fundamentally dishonest person.
Posted on 5/12/22 at 8:55 am to RealDawg
quote:
only one whistleblower
Odd. Not all that long ago these same "journalists" thought this was more than enough to impeach a president.
Posted on 5/12/22 at 8:55 am to RealDawg
Here's what I have never understood. All it takes is to offer a substantial award for confidential information confirming allegations of fraud.
Offer a $1M prize for a whistleblower(s) providing documentation confirming without a doubt the tactics, intent, and results of the ballot operation. Given the low paid types helping run these non-profit advocacy org.s, someone would come forward.
This has worked in the past. For that matter, do the same for media bias as well.
Offer a $1M prize for a whistleblower(s) providing documentation confirming without a doubt the tactics, intent, and results of the ballot operation. Given the low paid types helping run these non-profit advocacy org.s, someone would come forward.
This has worked in the past. For that matter, do the same for media bias as well.
Posted on 5/12/22 at 8:56 am to mmcgrath
quote:
At this point we have to assume that this doesn't exist.
Remember when you believed in Trump/Russia collusion without evidence?
Posted on 5/12/22 at 8:59 am to McChowder
quote:
I haven't seen the movie yet but what would be the explanation for a person's cell phone being within close proximity of 20+ drop boxes in one night?
The problem is they don’t really prove this in movie. They say it but don’t follow through with real proof.
That one article gives multiple examples of how it’s easily written off.
In Pennsylvania for example they had no video. A State politician says he has four devices and went around to all kinds of polling places. Just as example.
The same problem ON VIDEO going to multiple boxes and their path matched (hopefully with a name) And showing stops at democrat non profits.
They said they have all this but don’t show it. You had to know you couldn’t leave doors open.
Posted on 5/12/22 at 8:59 am to mmcgrath
What a lazy assed take. So your position is; they opted not to doxx individuals in an open accusation of felony election fraud in their movie - opening themselves up to a shitstorm of lawfare, so we should assume its all a lie?
Posted on 5/12/22 at 9:00 am to RealDawg
First, I completely believe that the election was stolen. But, I must say, I am so tired of all these different sites with their "shocking proof to be released soon" bs. Show me proof or shut up. They are just all trying to make money.
Posted on 5/12/22 at 9:01 am to the808bass
quote:
Remember when you believed in Trump/Russia collusion without evidence?
and Justice Kavanaugh was a serial rapist? Or that COVID came from Chinaman eating a raw bat?
Posted on 5/12/22 at 9:01 am to mmcgrath
quote:
mmcgrath
This post was edited on 5/12/22 at 9:02 am
Posted on 5/12/22 at 9:02 am to RealDawg
For those who have seen it we should expect this type of response from the MSM. It is why you have to forward links to the documentary "2000 Mules" to every contact you have in your possession asking them to do the very same thing. After 7 degress of separation, millions more will have seen this remarkable ducumentary.
2000 Mules For those of you needing the link.
2000 Mules For those of you needing the link.
Posted on 5/12/22 at 9:03 am to RealDawg
quote:
They said they have all this but don’t show it. You had to know you couldn’t leave doors open.
I think they may be using the Project Veritas approach where they present the evidence in a way that invites debunking. Like a trap.
That may also be wishful thinking.
Posted on 5/12/22 at 9:04 am to Vacherie Saint
He’s such a jagoff.
Posted on 5/12/22 at 9:05 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
What a lazy assed take. So your position is; they opted not to doxx individuals in an open accusation of felony election fraud in their movie - opening themselves up to a shitstorm of lawfare, so we should assume its all a lie?
Not my position. The one that was easily taken by media.
They never do show the same person at multiple boxes on video. They have one single whistle blower who wasn’t that compelling. They never showed a cell path matching a person on video with times stamps.
Again, they said they have all this. I just can’t figure why they didn’t show it?
It’s all left with we will release the data and maybe then you can put the pieces together.
There is 100% fraud going on in those videos. You can also easily “what if” it away with how they presented.
This post was edited on 5/12/22 at 9:07 am
Posted on 5/12/22 at 9:06 am to RealDawg
quote:
2000 Mules Fact Checking
Most the time these “fact checkers” are more needy of being looked at for veracity than who they claim they are checking!
Posted on 5/12/22 at 9:06 am to the808bass
quote:
I think they may be using the Project Veritas approach where they present the evidence in a way that invites debunking. Like a trap.
That may also be wishful thinking.
That is also what I'm hoping for. But we are well passed that at this point.
The Media's reputation is in the shitter with a huge majority of Americans. We don't need to see more of their corrupt fact checking.
What we need now is evidence. Real hard evidence, with names. Real people tied to cell phone geolocation tracking - tied to videos - tied to Democrat non-profit orgs is damning evidence that can actually be followed up on.
Page 1 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News