- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 16-Year-Old Hockey Player Dies on Christmas Day After Suffering Multiple Strokes
Posted on 12/28/22 at 4:46 pm to GhostOfFreedom
Posted on 12/28/22 at 4:46 pm to GhostOfFreedom
Young healthy athletes have always died.
The new norm...
The new norm...
1
Posted on 12/28/22 at 4:47 pm to LSUAngelHere1
quote:
Young healthy athletes have always died
He was diagnosed with a disease
i.e. not "healthy"
Posted on 12/28/22 at 4:48 pm to David_DJS
quote:
How did we know 79K people died of/with Covid the week ending 4/11/20 by the end of that April?
Because it's pretty easy to identify when someone is dead?
Posted on 12/28/22 at 4:51 pm to LSU2ALA
quote:
Looking for this stuff and posting it is not healthy. You need to get some help.
That's cute. You actually think someone has to look for all these people suddenly dying.
Posted on 12/28/22 at 4:52 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
Y'all are as bad as that LSUAngel person
GFY and get another booster. Fckg idiot.
Posted on 12/28/22 at 4:52 pm to Powerman
quote:
Because it's pretty easy to identify when someone is dead?
I'm not the one suggesting it takes 3 years to get the data. You should have addressed crazy4lsu with your comment.
Posted on 12/28/22 at 4:54 pm to Jake88
quote:
You dont know if he was vaccinated or not. You don't know if he ever had covid or not.
Oh we do know bc when theyre not jabbed (ie: Aaron Carter) it is mentioned in the article.
Posted on 12/28/22 at 4:58 pm to David_DJS
quote:
That's not how Covid was handled. And that's some of my argument. Still pushing back on the utter BS that was sold as "science" in 2020.
We can agree on that. And while I’m in strong favor of reorganizing public health so that it is far more transparent and trying to undo the complete regulatory capture, the process of science is still important.
quote:
Besides, isn't evidence discovered by looking for it?
Sure, but often there is an in-between scenario where you have a complicated case and look up case reports to find a similar presentation. If that pattern were repeated enough, it’d be hard to hide the evidence let alone ignore it.
quote:
for example, whether mRNA vaccines were contributing to early deaths for otherwise healthy people. But if by analyzing the data a correlation became apparent between vaccine status and sudden death incident rate, that might be worthwhile knowing and help focus work/research.
I agree, in principle, but it takes time to define discrete categories which can serve as a basis of comparison.
quote:
How did we know 79K people died of/with Covid the week ending 4/11/20 by the end of that April?
So my experience is that the life table compilation will be more exhaustive, as the weekly and monthly data and the ultimate life table data won’t exactly match up, nor will the data from government statistic bureaus and government health organizations. I think some of the discrepancy is due to deaths being counted more than once, and each country has a different way of including non-citizen and citizen data, which can account for a small proportion of the discrepancy. I think the British data is a little easier to access, as the CDC changed formats recently (I think), but you can see that the week-to-week and month-to-month data is slightly different from the year-to-year data, and that was the case even before COVID. I made this realization looking for the excess death data, as different British organizations put out slightly different datasets.
The data that demographers use in the US is mostly from the life table data, but I’ll try to find a more concrete answer for the discrepancy between datasets between intra-national organizations. Maybe I made a mistake looking at the data initially. Ultimately, there are several thousands of way you could organize the data, and we are at the behest of several agencies, such as the CDC, who have variable trust amongst the populace.
Posted on 12/28/22 at 5:01 pm to Powerman
quote:
He was diagnosed with a disease
i.e. not "healthy"
Uh huh... the social experiment injection had nothing to do with his death.
Posted on 12/28/22 at 5:04 pm to bayoucracka
quote:You think Political Talk is a better place than the OT board to discuss a 16 year old dying from a rare disease?
You got a suggestion of where the thread should be moved? Maybe the Money Board?
Posted on 12/28/22 at 5:05 pm to BurntOrangeMan
quote:Judging from other posts in this thread, it's not just me.
“We”? It’s down to “you”.
Looks like you tried and read about as much as the OP did...which is not much.
Nice try though, good effort.
Posted on 12/28/22 at 5:06 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
So my experience is that the life table compilation will be more exhaustive, as the weekly and monthly data and the ultimate life table data won’t exactly match up, nor will the data from government statistic bureaus and government health organizations. I think some of the discrepancy is due to deaths being counted more than once, and each country has a different way of including non-citizen and citizen data, which can account for a small proportion of the discrepancy. I think the British data is a little easier to access, as the CDC changed formats recently (I think), but you can see that the week-to-week and month-to-month data is slightly different from the year-to-year data, and that was the case even before COVID. I made this realization looking for the excess death data, as different British organizations put out slightly different datasets.
The data that demographers use in the US is mostly from the life table data, but I’ll try to find a more concrete answer for the discrepancy between datasets between intra-national organizations. Maybe I made a mistake looking at the data initially. Ultimately, there are several thousands of way you could organize the data, and we are at the behest of several agencies, such as the CDC, who have variable trust amongst the populace.
I think for the purposes of looking for a correlation, wouldn't the necessary info be available - if not readily, relatively quickly?
Posted on 12/28/22 at 5:07 pm to shel311
quote:
You think Political Talk is a better place than the OT board to discuss a 16 year old dying from a rare disease? ?
So you could RA it?
Posted on 12/28/22 at 5:15 pm to i am dan
quote:
I've spoken with two tenured research biologists studying mRNA, and both said they wouldn't take the vaccine because the adverse effects could become apparent within 2-3 generations. Seems like some effects came sooner.
My sister-in-law is jabbed and is in a very high risk pregnancy. (Never had any problems spitting them out before) Her OB-GYN told her that since the jab came out, heart problems, gestational diabetes and babies with abnormally small bodies have all increased notably.
A renown oncologist told my father-in-law “there’s no way I’m sticking that bullshite in my body.”
My Secretary got myocarditis after the jab.
A triathlete female I work with clotted and nearly died after her jab.
Another co-worker’s teen daughter developed serious female problems after her jab.
People are freaking out of their minds to suggest there are no documented problems with this trash. There’s certainly no reason to give it to a young or middle-aged healthy person, for sure.
Posted on 12/28/22 at 5:18 pm to David_DJS
quote:
I think for the purposes of looking for a correlation, wouldn't the necessary info be available - if not readily, relatively quickly?
Yes, and that is likely true for any general macro trend.
Posted on 12/28/22 at 5:24 pm to shel311
quote:
The frick you do
You don't want us to know, because it helps you sleep better at night. You think you are safe from the poison you put in your body, if you ignore it and it isn't forced in front of you. Am I right?
Posted on 12/28/22 at 5:28 pm to BigMob
quote:moyamoya disease primarily affects children in his age group. Did you even read the OP or did you just see the word seizure and jump straight to vaccination status?
hAppEnS AlL tHE TiMe tO sIXTeeN yEaR OLd aThLeTeS
Really an interesting social experiment we’ve had the last couple years. First it was the crazy left calling every death a COVID death and now it’s the crazy right calling every death a vaccine death. Y’all are both crazy just at opposite ends of the spectrum.
This post was edited on 12/28/22 at 5:35 pm
Posted on 12/28/22 at 5:29 pm to Powerman
quote:
He was diagnosed with a disease
i.e. not "healthy"
Healthy until maybe the covid poison jab?
Posted on 12/28/22 at 5:32 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Yes, and that is likely true for any general macro trend.
I'm very curious to see what's legit going on. There are some scientists (data guys) that I read that proved very insightful about the virus that, even back then, predicted "Covid response" would kill (legit kill) more people than the virus would, and they now think it's going to be by a multiple. They're considering everything from increased drug ODs due to lockdown-related depression, suicides, to delayed cancer diagnosis/treatment. They believe data already suggests the vaccines will end up killing a substantial number of people.
Posted on 12/28/22 at 5:32 pm to GhostOfFreedom
All I feel is a huge swell of sadness for the family who lost their young child on Christmas Day. They will never feel the same way about Christmas again.
Page 10 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News