- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What are the pros and cons of 6.5 creedmore
Posted on 1/10/25 at 11:18 am to saintsfan1977
Posted on 1/10/25 at 11:18 am to saintsfan1977
No, i did not say that

Posted on 1/10/25 at 11:24 am to Citica8
quote:
If you were trying to go take out a telephone pole, would you rather hit it at 150mph with a crotch rocket or 55mph with an 18 wheeler?
You seem to be under the impression there there is an orders of magnitude difference between these bullet diameters/weights that simply doesn't exist.
a better comparison would be a 150mph crotch rocket or a 100 mph Harley
Posted on 1/10/25 at 11:24 am to 257WBY
quote:
308 is a great answer to nearly every deer hunting situation in the Deep South.
With the new managed/reduced recoil ammo out now, absolutely, same could be said about 270 in that case.
Factory ammo off the shelf could be a little much for a 70lb 9 year old though.
Posted on 1/10/25 at 11:26 am to ccard257
quote:
question the recovery/exit aspect
I did more deer tracking than deer hunting for a few years. It's definitely a problem.
quote:
the vast majority of non-recovered deer that get blamed on lack of blood trail/pass through are poorly placed shots into guts/backstraps/briskets/etc. that another .5mm of diameter wouldn't have done anything for.
A dog changes this a bit. You actually do recover a lot of deer that otherwise would have been lost, and pulling from memory id say it was about evenly split bad shots vs no exits vs hunter error where we had to get the dog involved. I think that 100% of the ones we didn't recover were terrible shots and i think they were largely leg hits or flesh wounds. Unfortunately I can't prove that, but you can't make a good shot with a rifle and the deer not die, and if it's dead the dog will find it. I did get to see some of them that we jumped a few times and chased across the parish and those were mostly single leg hits or gut shots. We often got the gut shot ones eventually but rarely the 3 legged ones.
We found A LOT of deer within 100 yards of where they were shot. A whole whole lot of them, and those were often deer in very thick terrain with no exit hole, or just generally very bad blood trails, or the shooter having no idea where the deer was when shot.
It's all mental masturbation, but it is a thing that happens. Its more dependent on bullet choice and shot placement than the headstamp.
150gr core locts from .30-06 was one of the big offenders. I think its too fast for the bullet construction, and its so prolific that there's lots of opportunity out there for it to show up. Killed the deers very very dead but would often not exit.
This post was edited on 1/10/25 at 11:38 am
Posted on 1/10/25 at 11:33 am to LChama
Pro: shoots a long way
Con: No blood so you can't figure out where they were standing
Con: No blood so you can't figure out where they were standing
Posted on 1/10/25 at 11:36 am to ccard257
quote:
You seem to be under the impression there there is an orders of magnitude difference between these bullet diameters/weights that simply doesn't exist.
a better comparison would be a 150mph crotch rocket or a 100 mph Harley
It was definitely exaggerated for effect. In reality, probably could have been a civic doing 70mph and pickup doing 65mph, but that's not as fun.
This post was edited on 1/10/25 at 11:41 am
Posted on 1/10/25 at 11:39 am to Citica8
quote:
To dumb down what downshift said, bigger hole, more blood on ground, which makes it easier to find.
You don't need a bazooka to kill a deer. You want blood trails use the right bullet.
We're talking about fractions of an inch here. 243, 277,284,308. Sure the sectional density is different but the hole size is barely bigger.
I'd bet good money that an 80gr Barnes TTSX in 243,will exit through both shoulders out to 200yds no problem. Possibly even 300yds.
Posted on 1/10/25 at 11:47 am to saintsfan1977
Somebody needs to post some energy charts of these calibers:
quote:
30-30, 350 legend, and 360 buckhammer
quote:
6.5 creedmore
Posted on 1/10/25 at 11:55 am to kengel2


This post was edited on 1/10/25 at 12:00 pm
Posted on 1/10/25 at 12:01 pm to saintsfan1977
[quote]bet good money that an 80gr Barnes TTSX in 243,will exit through both shoulders out to 200yds no problem. Possibly even 300yds.
[/quote
It gets better at long range (up to a point of course) because the bullet will open less than at close range. Its probably got a better chance of exiting at 300 yards than 30 yards.
[/quote
It gets better at long range (up to a point of course) because the bullet will open less than at close range. Its probably got a better chance of exiting at 300 yards than 30 yards.
Posted on 1/10/25 at 12:07 pm to Ol boy
Thanks.
I think some people here need to invest in a 444 Marlin.

I think some people here need to invest in a 444 Marlin.

Posted on 1/10/25 at 12:08 pm to saintsfan1977
I wouldn't call a .30-30 a bazooka, nor any of those guns.
I am a Barnes TTSX, and a Nosler Partition guy, which I would say are the right bullets.
We got a full pass through on the 243 last year, heart shot through both shoulders, at 75 yards but no blood. Deer was piled up 100-120 yards away, zig zagged through the woods and came up on the deer before we found any blood.
We are talking about fractions of an inch, but with my experience, and I'll die on this hill that a 243 doesn't open up a big enough hole for reliable tracking, especially in the hands of a kid.
Energy for the 30cal guns
I am a Barnes TTSX, and a Nosler Partition guy, which I would say are the right bullets.
We got a full pass through on the 243 last year, heart shot through both shoulders, at 75 yards but no blood. Deer was piled up 100-120 yards away, zig zagged through the woods and came up on the deer before we found any blood.
We are talking about fractions of an inch, but with my experience, and I'll die on this hill that a 243 doesn't open up a big enough hole for reliable tracking, especially in the hands of a kid.
Energy for the 30cal guns

Posted on 1/10/25 at 12:14 pm to Citica8
quote:
We got a full pass through on the 243 last year, heart shot through both shoulders, at 75 yards but no blood. Deer was piled up 100-120 yards away, zig zagged through the woods and came up on the deer before we found any blood.
I've never had a deer run when shot through both shoulders. They instantly DRT. Behind the shoulders they usually run.
quote:
We are talking about fractions of an inch, but with my experience, and I'll die on this hill that a 243 doesn't open up a big enough hole for reliable tracking, especially in the hands of a kid.
Energy for the 30cal guns
That energy sucks for 30cal bullets.
Velocity makes energy. The 243 will have 400lb to 500lb more energy at 200yds than any of those calibers in your chart.
This post was edited on 1/10/25 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 1/10/25 at 12:18 pm to Citica8
At the other end of the spectrum, I've seen 1+" permanent holes in both entry and exit
on deer shot with a .338, so horsepower can make a difference, at least between one extreme and the other. I'm not bestowing the virtues of shooting deer with a cannon, but there is a perceptible difference between having bone and meat chunks all over the place vs a 1/4" hole on both sides, and what that means for reliably recovering deer.
There's also the fans of explosive expansion which means lots of organ goo and instantly or very very quickly dead deer. Not my cup of tea, but it works.
6.5 creedmoor has such a broad ammo selection that you can easily pick between explosive or penetration and any compromise between the two. Disregarding sexual preferences, it really is the most sensible choice for a do-all deer rifle caliber IMO.
on deer shot with a .338, so horsepower can make a difference, at least between one extreme and the other. I'm not bestowing the virtues of shooting deer with a cannon, but there is a perceptible difference between having bone and meat chunks all over the place vs a 1/4" hole on both sides, and what that means for reliably recovering deer.
There's also the fans of explosive expansion which means lots of organ goo and instantly or very very quickly dead deer. Not my cup of tea, but it works.
6.5 creedmoor has such a broad ammo selection that you can easily pick between explosive or penetration and any compromise between the two. Disregarding sexual preferences, it really is the most sensible choice for a do-all deer rifle caliber IMO.
Posted on 1/10/25 at 12:22 pm to Citica8

You do realize there is only one .30 cal bullet in this comparison, right?
Posted on 1/10/25 at 12:24 pm to bbvdd
And what is that chart doing in a discussion about bottleneck cartridges? Its completely irrelevant.
.38-55 and .378 weatherby are the same caliber. Should we discuss the comparisons between them?
.38-55 and .378 weatherby are the same caliber. Should we discuss the comparisons between them?
Posted on 1/10/25 at 12:47 pm to LChama
Both of my boys hunt with ruger Americans in 6.5 creedmoore. They each dropped deer this season on less than perfect shot placement using Barnes 120 gr ttsx blue tips. Recoil is next to nothing with the mpa muzzle breaks
Posted on 1/10/25 at 12:52 pm to bayoudude
The 6.5 CM has more power to it than the 6.5 Grendel, and I wreck deer with my 6.5 Grendel.
Posted on 1/10/25 at 1:25 pm to Ol boy
I have a tracking dog. I have tracked more deer from baws with just an ole thirty aught six than any other gun, by far….
Anyway, the 6.5 performs just as well as any other deer rifle from my experience tracking. Use an interlock bullet and you are good to go
ETA: I have never truly noticed any difference in .3006, 270, .308, 6.5, 7mm08 from tracking purposes. Shot placement is equal and all the above seem to perform the same
ETA 2: I tracked a 280lb buck that only went 50 yards shot by a 110 pound woman with a .243 with a 100 grain hornady interlock
ETA3:
Yes yes yes. So many deer the dog would find only 25 yards away but Hunter had no clue where it was due to ZERO blood at sight
Anyway, the 6.5 performs just as well as any other deer rifle from my experience tracking. Use an interlock bullet and you are good to go
ETA: I have never truly noticed any difference in .3006, 270, .308, 6.5, 7mm08 from tracking purposes. Shot placement is equal and all the above seem to perform the same
ETA 2: I tracked a 280lb buck that only went 50 yards shot by a 110 pound woman with a .243 with a 100 grain hornady interlock
ETA3:
quote:
150gr core locts from .30-06 was one of the big offenders. I think it’s too fast for the bullet construction, and it’s so prolific that there's lots of opportunity out there for it to show up. Killed the deers very very dead but would often not exit.
Yes yes yes. So many deer the dog would find only 25 yards away but Hunter had no clue where it was due to ZERO blood at sight
This post was edited on 1/10/25 at 1:34 pm
Popular
Back to top
