Started By
Message

re: The Art of Selecting a Self Defense Weapon for the wife/gf...

Posted on 2/28/12 at 5:09 pm to
Posted by Ole Geauxt
KnowLa.
Member since Dec 2007
50880 posts
Posted on 2/28/12 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

if you hit anyone at 20'
so, i have to wait until they're in my closet before i shoot em?
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22151 posts
Posted on 2/28/12 at 5:22 pm to
If you were loading a shotgun for home defense would you strategically place a slug in there anywhere assuming you had 6 + 1 capacity? I think maybe the first 2 or 3 shells be 00 then maybe a slug or two for a little more umph and damage.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 2/28/12 at 5:32 pm to
I wouldnt. Buckshot is disgusting at close range. Slugs will definitely over-penetrate.
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22151 posts
Posted on 2/28/12 at 5:35 pm to
Even 20 ga?
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 2/28/12 at 5:41 pm to
I would only maybe do it in a .410.

Eta: just my opinion. Im no expert.
This post was edited on 2/28/12 at 5:42 pm
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81590 posts
Posted on 2/28/12 at 6:17 pm to
quote:

I went to Academy in the spring and the only 20 gauge buckshot on the shelf was #4.
There was a time when that is all one could find in 20 gauge. I have not shopped for it in over 25 years.
Posted by faxis
La.
Member since Oct 2007
7773 posts
Posted on 2/28/12 at 6:34 pm to
I'm mostly just fricking with you. The difference in velocity is probably no more than 120fps. The difference in shot is a quarter ounce. The difference in pattern is dependent upon length of the barrel. The difference in recoil is negligible because of the difference in weight of the gun.

All of which is the same kind of quibbling shite you were ragging on the .243 for.

Just don't let goat start that Judge crap in this conversation and I won't go bat shite.

Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81590 posts
Posted on 2/28/12 at 6:48 pm to
quote:

that Judge crap
better than anything mentioned so far.
Posted by Nascar Fan
Columbia La.
Member since Jul 2011
18574 posts
Posted on 2/28/12 at 6:50 pm to
Well done Slick
Now for my 2 cents.
Anyone that cares for they're wife these days should teach them to shoot. Take time out of your important day of hunting or fishing & take them shooting. Don't start her out with 10 gauges or 44 mag. My wife & daughter are now shooting skeets with me with there 20 gauges & shooting pistols with me.
My wife has 2 pistols, a 380 & a 32. I just bought a 9mm & she likes to shoot it more than them. Looks like i'll have to buy her one now.
My daughter like my 22 revolver.
Posted by Ole Geauxt
KnowLa.
Member since Dec 2007
50880 posts
Posted on 2/28/12 at 7:08 pm to
quote:

better than anything mentioned so far.
Posted by dawg23
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Jul 2011
5065 posts
Posted on 2/28/12 at 7:12 pm to
Massad Ayoob is a proponent of the 20 gauge loaded with #3 or #4 buckshot.

Here's a neat view of #4 buck in 20% ballistic gelatin (most testing is done with 10% gelatin, so this is more rigorous). LINK

Here's a link to the "Box of Truth" testing the penetration of shotguns. Buckshot = good home defense choice:
LINK #2
Posted by faxis
La.
Member since Oct 2007
7773 posts
Posted on 2/28/12 at 7:16 pm to
Yeah I wasn't kidding about the #4buck being better than the 00 for home defense.

It is.
Posted by coloradoBengal
Member since Sep 2007
32608 posts
Posted on 2/28/12 at 8:52 pm to
quote:

s. While I don't claim to be any sort of exalted expert, and do not at all claim to be a guru in these matters,



Sure you don't.

Stick to your blanket generalizations, dramatization and ballistics minutiae though. At least you can sound smart in your mind.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 2/28/12 at 8:54 pm to
quote:

All of which is the same kind of quibbling shite you were ragging on the .243 for.


That's comparing apples to diesel trucks
Posted by dawg23
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Jul 2011
5065 posts
Posted on 2/29/12 at 9:53 am to
quote:

Sure you don't.
Stick to your blanket generalizations, dramatization and ballistics minutiae though. At least you can sound smart in your mind.


So I guess this means you're not gonna share your training credentials ?

This post was edited on 2/29/12 at 9:57 am
Posted by TigerOnThe Hill
Springhill, LA
Member since Sep 2008
6810 posts
Posted on 2/29/12 at 11:13 am to
dawg23,
quote:

Revolvers are easy to operate. They are difficult for a beginner to shoot well (with "well" being defined by most trainers as the ability to fire accurate, reasonably rapid follow-up shots.


You pointed out some potential problems that beginner shooters can encounter when shooting revolvers. If you don't mid, I have 2 questions I'd like to ask:
1. In your above quote, are you referring to revolvers w/ all barrel lengths or snubnoses?
2. If not revovlers, what handgun do you recommend for the beginner?

Thanks.
Posted by bbvdd
Memphis, TN
Member since Jun 2009
24928 posts
Posted on 2/29/12 at 1:03 pm to
According to the Box O' Truth that was posted the .380 actually has better penetration than the high and mighty .40.

So, what is there to say?

In here is the .380 test.

In here is the .40 test
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81590 posts
Posted on 2/29/12 at 1:09 pm to
I would not want to be shot in the face with a .380. I know that for sures.
Posted by dawg23
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Jul 2011
5065 posts
Posted on 2/29/12 at 3:46 pm to
quote:


According to the Box O' Truth that was posted the .380 actually has better penetration than the high and mighty .40.

So, what is there to say?


1. You may be comparing the FMJ .380 results (4 jugs) with the .40 HP (3 jugs) results.

2. They weren't shooting comparable ammo. For example, if they had fired Hydra-Shoks in the .380 and in the .40S&W, you'd have more comparable results.

3. I also seem to recall that the .40 S&W bullets separated from the jackets -- this substantially reduces penetration. This rarely. if ever, happens with the HST and never happens with the DPX (it has no jacket).

4. I agree w/ AlxTgr -- I don't want to get shot with a .380 -- but I also don't really crave getting shot with a pellet gun. I be's a wuss.
This post was edited on 2/29/12 at 3:50 pm
Posted by dawg23
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Jul 2011
5065 posts
Posted on 2/29/12 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

1. In your above quote, are you referring to revolvers w/ all barrel lengths or snubnoses?
2. If not revovlers, what handgun do you recommend for the beginner?



Good question -- I shudda clarified.

In the original post, the images listed were J-frame revolvers. I assumed that the OP was talking about the snub-nose revolvers -- but as I think back, it's likely that he didn't specifically limit his discussion to "snubbies."

Anyway, my comment about "easy to operate, difficult to shoot well" was made in reference to the J-frames -- especially the air weights. Heavy triggers, rudimentary rear sights, short sight radius and heavy felt recoil make them hard to shoot well at ranges beyond "up close."

As you know, the larger (K-frame and N-frame) revolvers have better sights, longer sight radius, better triggers, less muzzle flip and less felt recoil. I think they are great for beginners -- or anyone else for that matter. They are slower to reload than semi-autos, but the "quality" revolvers are incredibly reliable.

In response to your second question -- I think other good choices for beginners are the "simple" semi-autos (meaning few, or no safety levers, switches, etc.) like Glocks or M&P's.

I usually start a brand new shooter (think "soccer mom") with a Glock 19 shooting .22 LR ammo through an Advantage Arms Conversion Kit. The operation of the gun using the AACK is identical to using it with the 9mm slide & barrel (mag loading, mag release, racking the slide, releasing the slide, sights, trigger pull, etc).

Once the new shooter is consistently getting good groups with the .22, I put the 9mm slide & barrel back on the Glock frame. Depending on the student, I may have them shoot some reduced power 9mm cartridges before having them shoot regular FMJ ammo (WWB or Blazer). The whole idea is to "ease" them into shooting the 9mm and develop good trigger control skills without developing a flinch.

The people that come to me who already have a flinch issue, or have a fear of the gun, were usually handed a .40 S&W, or an air weight J-frame, or some "Desert Eagle" type weapon by a well-intentioned husband or boyfriend.

I'm sure others have a better system for showing "newbies" how to choot. I'm just mentioning what seems to work consistently for my students (male & female).
This post was edited on 3/1/12 at 7:55 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram