- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/28/12 at 5:22 pm to Slickback
If you were loading a shotgun for home defense would you strategically place a slug in there anywhere assuming you had 6 + 1 capacity? I think maybe the first 2 or 3 shells be 00 then maybe a slug or two for a little more umph and damage.
Posted on 2/28/12 at 5:32 pm to UpToPar
I wouldnt. Buckshot is disgusting at close range. Slugs will definitely over-penetrate.
Posted on 2/28/12 at 5:41 pm to UpToPar
I would only maybe do it in a .410.
Eta: just my opinion. Im no expert.
Eta: just my opinion. Im no expert.
This post was edited on 2/28/12 at 5:42 pm
Posted on 2/28/12 at 6:17 pm to Boats n Hose
quote:There was a time when that is all one could find in 20 gauge. I have not shopped for it in over 25 years.
I went to Academy in the spring and the only 20 gauge buckshot on the shelf was #4.
Posted on 2/28/12 at 6:34 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
I'm mostly just fricking with you. The difference in velocity is probably no more than 120fps. The difference in shot is a quarter ounce. The difference in pattern is dependent upon length of the barrel. The difference in recoil is negligible because of the difference in weight of the gun.
All of which is the same kind of quibbling shite you were ragging on the .243 for.
Just don't let goat start that Judge crap in this conversation and I won't go bat shite.
All of which is the same kind of quibbling shite you were ragging on the .243 for.
Just don't let goat start that Judge crap in this conversation and I won't go bat shite.
Posted on 2/28/12 at 6:48 pm to faxis
quote:better than anything mentioned so far.
that Judge crap
Posted on 2/28/12 at 6:50 pm to Slickback
Well done Slick
Now for my 2 cents.
Anyone that cares for they're wife these days should teach them to shoot. Take time out of your important day of hunting or fishing & take them shooting. Don't start her out with 10 gauges or 44 mag. My wife & daughter are now shooting skeets with me with there 20 gauges & shooting pistols with me.
My wife has 2 pistols, a 380 & a 32. I just bought a 9mm & she likes to shoot it more than them. Looks like i'll have to buy her one now.
My daughter like my 22 revolver.
Now for my 2 cents.
Anyone that cares for they're wife these days should teach them to shoot. Take time out of your important day of hunting or fishing & take them shooting. Don't start her out with 10 gauges or 44 mag. My wife & daughter are now shooting skeets with me with there 20 gauges & shooting pistols with me.
My wife has 2 pistols, a 380 & a 32. I just bought a 9mm & she likes to shoot it more than them. Looks like i'll have to buy her one now.
My daughter like my 22 revolver.
Posted on 2/28/12 at 7:08 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
better than anything mentioned so far.
Posted on 2/28/12 at 7:12 pm to Nascar Fan
Massad Ayoob is a proponent of the 20 gauge loaded with #3 or #4 buckshot.
Here's a neat view of #4 buck in 20% ballistic gelatin (most testing is done with 10% gelatin, so this is more rigorous). LINK
Here's a link to the "Box of Truth" testing the penetration of shotguns. Buckshot = good home defense choice:
LINK #2
Here's a neat view of #4 buck in 20% ballistic gelatin (most testing is done with 10% gelatin, so this is more rigorous). LINK
Here's a link to the "Box of Truth" testing the penetration of shotguns. Buckshot = good home defense choice:
LINK #2
Posted on 2/28/12 at 7:16 pm to dawg23
Yeah I wasn't kidding about the #4buck being better than the 00 for home defense.
It is.
It is.
Posted on 2/28/12 at 8:52 pm to dawg23
quote:
s. While I don't claim to be any sort of exalted expert, and do not at all claim to be a guru in these matters,
Sure you don't.
Stick to your blanket generalizations, dramatization and ballistics minutiae though. At least you can sound smart in your mind.
Posted on 2/28/12 at 8:54 pm to faxis
quote:
All of which is the same kind of quibbling shite you were ragging on the .243 for.
That's comparing apples to diesel trucks
Posted on 2/29/12 at 9:53 am to coloradoBengal
quote:
Sure you don't.
Stick to your blanket generalizations, dramatization and ballistics minutiae though. At least you can sound smart in your mind.
So I guess this means you're not gonna share your training credentials ?
This post was edited on 2/29/12 at 9:57 am
Posted on 2/29/12 at 11:13 am to AlxTgr
dawg23,
You pointed out some potential problems that beginner shooters can encounter when shooting revolvers. If you don't mid, I have 2 questions I'd like to ask:
1. In your above quote, are you referring to revolvers w/ all barrel lengths or snubnoses?
2. If not revovlers, what handgun do you recommend for the beginner?
Thanks.
quote:
Revolvers are easy to operate. They are difficult for a beginner to shoot well (with "well" being defined by most trainers as the ability to fire accurate, reasonably rapid follow-up shots.
You pointed out some potential problems that beginner shooters can encounter when shooting revolvers. If you don't mid, I have 2 questions I'd like to ask:
1. In your above quote, are you referring to revolvers w/ all barrel lengths or snubnoses?
2. If not revovlers, what handgun do you recommend for the beginner?
Thanks.
Posted on 2/29/12 at 1:03 pm to TigerOnThe Hill
According to the Box O' Truth that was posted the .380 actually has better penetration than the high and mighty .40.
So, what is there to say?
In here is the .380 test.
In here is the .40 test
So, what is there to say?
In here is the .380 test.
In here is the .40 test
Posted on 2/29/12 at 1:09 pm to bbvdd
I would not want to be shot in the face with a .380. I know that for sures.
Posted on 2/29/12 at 3:46 pm to bbvdd
quote:
According to the Box O' Truth that was posted the .380 actually has better penetration than the high and mighty .40.
So, what is there to say?
1. You may be comparing the FMJ .380 results (4 jugs) with the .40 HP (3 jugs) results.
2. They weren't shooting comparable ammo. For example, if they had fired Hydra-Shoks in the .380 and in the .40S&W, you'd have more comparable results.
3. I also seem to recall that the .40 S&W bullets separated from the jackets -- this substantially reduces penetration. This rarely. if ever, happens with the HST and never happens with the DPX (it has no jacket).
4. I agree w/ AlxTgr -- I don't want to get shot with a .380 -- but I also don't really crave getting shot with a pellet gun. I be's a wuss.
This post was edited on 2/29/12 at 3:50 pm
Posted on 2/29/12 at 4:18 pm to TigerOnThe Hill
quote:
1. In your above quote, are you referring to revolvers w/ all barrel lengths or snubnoses?
2. If not revovlers, what handgun do you recommend for the beginner?
Good question -- I shudda clarified.
In the original post, the images listed were J-frame revolvers. I assumed that the OP was talking about the snub-nose revolvers -- but as I think back, it's likely that he didn't specifically limit his discussion to "snubbies."
Anyway, my comment about "easy to operate, difficult to shoot well" was made in reference to the J-frames -- especially the air weights. Heavy triggers, rudimentary rear sights, short sight radius and heavy felt recoil make them hard to shoot well at ranges beyond "up close."
As you know, the larger (K-frame and N-frame) revolvers have better sights, longer sight radius, better triggers, less muzzle flip and less felt recoil. I think they are great for beginners -- or anyone else for that matter. They are slower to reload than semi-autos, but the "quality" revolvers are incredibly reliable.
In response to your second question -- I think other good choices for beginners are the "simple" semi-autos (meaning few, or no safety levers, switches, etc.) like Glocks or M&P's.
I usually start a brand new shooter (think "soccer mom") with a Glock 19 shooting .22 LR ammo through an Advantage Arms Conversion Kit. The operation of the gun using the AACK is identical to using it with the 9mm slide & barrel (mag loading, mag release, racking the slide, releasing the slide, sights, trigger pull, etc).
Once the new shooter is consistently getting good groups with the .22, I put the 9mm slide & barrel back on the Glock frame. Depending on the student, I may have them shoot some reduced power 9mm cartridges before having them shoot regular FMJ ammo (WWB or Blazer). The whole idea is to "ease" them into shooting the 9mm and develop good trigger control skills without developing a flinch.
The people that come to me who already have a flinch issue, or have a fear of the gun, were usually handed a .40 S&W, or an air weight J-frame, or some "Desert Eagle" type weapon by a well-intentioned husband or boyfriend.
I'm sure others have a better system for showing "newbies" how to choot. I'm just mentioning what seems to work consistently for my students (male & female).
This post was edited on 3/1/12 at 7:55 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News