Started By
Message

LEOs claim that Sig P320 will fire spontaneously

Posted on 5/23/23 at 11:48 am
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18032 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 11:48 am
SIAP

https://nypost.com/2023/05/22/dozens-of-cops-claim-sig-sauer-handgun-fires-on-its-own-without-even-being-touched/

quote:

The SIG Sauer P320 semi-automatic handgun is used by some 1,000 law enforcement agencies from the local to the federal level, as well as being a popular civilian purchase.
But its manufacturer is facing a slew of lawsuits alleging that it can fire even when holstered, even when the trigger isn’t pulled, and even when it is just sitting at rest, lawyers allege.

According to the suits against SIG Sauer, some 150 people claim to have suffered injuries, or frightening near misses, when their department-issued P320 went off on its own.
Posted by Animal
Member since Dec 2017
4214 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

150 people


Had to blame their screw up on something.
Posted by jbgleason
Bailed out of BTR to God's Country
Member since Mar 2012
18889 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 2:17 pm to
As I said in the other thread, every single person claiming the pistol fired on its own is also facing disciplinary action from their employer as a result of the discharge.

There are no independent witnesses or video (besides a grainy black and white parking lot video) and no one has been able to replicate the behavior in a controlled setting.

I have serious doubts as to this liability lawyers claims.
Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
27313 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 3:11 pm to
Sig isn't my cup of tea. And I consider them over rated crap.


And this whole situation is BUUUUULLLLLLLLSHHHHIIIIITTTTTT



I will make exception for the sig nightmare 1911
Posted by Jack Ruby
Member since Apr 2014
22692 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 5:17 pm to
I mean, modern SIGs have always had drop safe issues because of the non-safety trigger, but this just sounds like morons who had ADs and blamed it on the gun.
Posted by BorrisMart
La
Member since Jul 2020
8810 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 8:54 pm to
hasn't the p320 been having issues like this since it came out? Supposedly they "fixed" it. p226 or bust
Posted by TigrrrDad
Member since Oct 2016
7079 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 9:37 pm to
I call as my first witness…Alec Baldwin!
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
36185 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

But its manufacturer is facing a slew of lawsuits alleging that it can fire even when holstered, even when the trigger isn’t pulled, and even when it is just sitting at rest, lawyers allege.

I mean

a pistol at rest, holstered, and unbothered should not be firing.

I said before there appears to be something going on with this model in particular as opposed to other Sig models.

I have a Sig 365 XL, Sig 226 Legion, and a 1911. I like Sig. But I also trust those weapons. IF those weapons started pulling voodoo stuff then I would be avoiding those weapons as well.
Posted by civiltiger07
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
14020 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

a pistol at rest, holstered, and unbothered should not be firing.


The sig p320 is not firing at rest, holstered, or unbothered.
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
36185 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 10:51 pm to
quote:

But its manufacturer is facing a slew of lawsuits alleging that it can fire even when holstered, even when the trigger isn’t pulled, and even when it is just sitting at rest, lawyers allege.

Well, again, there are tons of sig models out there. Please explain why the mean press and corrupt lawyers want to pick on only this model, and not the others.
This post was edited on 5/23/23 at 10:52 pm
Posted by Animal
Member since Dec 2017
4214 posts
Posted on 5/24/23 at 6:09 am to
quote:

Well, again, there are tons of sig models out there. Please explain why the mean press and corrupt lawyers want to pick on only this model, and not the others.


Because it is standard issue for many depts which would make municiple departments, Sheriff depts, and various other govt agencies co-defendants. Those guys have big insurance policies too.
Posted by Gaston
Dirty Coast
Member since Aug 2008
38902 posts
Posted on 5/24/23 at 7:05 am to
quote:

non-safety trigger


They don’t have a firing pin block and spring like an HK? If you don’t pull the trigger then the block doesn’t get out of the way…no matter what else happens (hammer hitting the firing pin).
Posted by civiltiger07
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
14020 posts
Posted on 5/24/23 at 7:18 am to
quote:

lawyers allege


Most important words of your quote.

The pistols did not just fire on their own. Something manipulated the trigger.
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
36185 posts
Posted on 5/24/23 at 7:59 am to
quote:

ecause it is standard issue for many depts which would make municiple departments, Sheriff depts, and various other govt agencies co-defendants.
They are only one of the standard issue. And if anything, they are closer to banned than standard issue at this point.


So we are back to why is this pistol getting singled out yet again.
This post was edited on 5/24/23 at 8:14 am
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
36185 posts
Posted on 5/24/23 at 8:03 am to
quote:

The pistols did not just fire on their own. Something manipulated the trigger.

I see you’re trying to angle to negligence firing those weapons.


But possibly 150 LEO incidents?

Is there another weapon that rivals this number of ADs? Or even comes close? Public or private
Posted by bbvdd
Memphis, TN
Member since Jun 2009
24905 posts
Posted on 5/24/23 at 8:20 am to
Never happened with Glocks, right?

Washington Post article

quote:

In the 10 years since D.C. police adopted the Glock 9mm to combat the growing firepower of drug dealers, there have been more than 120 accidental discharges of the handgun.


That’s only one police department
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
36185 posts
Posted on 5/24/23 at 8:34 am to
Thanks for your 1998 article.

Glock isn’t a model.

That’s like saying Sig is a model.

Currently they are not after SIG. Only the Sig 320s.
Posted by bbvdd
Memphis, TN
Member since Jun 2009
24905 posts
Posted on 5/24/23 at 8:40 am to
quote:

Glock isn’t a model.


Glock is not a model. You’re right, however the trigger mechanism is the exact same in every single model within the different generations.

And who gives a shite if it’s a 1998 article? It blew your statement out of the water. It’s one department that had over 120 accidental discharges.
This post was edited on 5/24/23 at 8:41 am
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81570 posts
Posted on 5/24/23 at 8:42 am to
Are they firing in people's cars, safes or night stands?
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
36185 posts
Posted on 5/24/23 at 8:45 am to
quote:

Glock is not a model. You’re right, however the trigger mechanism is the exact same in every single model within the different generations.

You can say that about Sig and the rest of their weapons. So why are they only focused on 320?


320 isn’t really a standard issue. I have a 226 and that might be closer to standard issue.

Would you buy your wife a specific weapon that has been embroiled in lawsuits for years?

If trained LEO’s can’t help but to shoot themselves…
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram