Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Colt introduces new polymer framed .380

Posted on 5/6/13 at 12:02 am
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 5/6/13 at 12:02 am
Colt Mustang XSP

Thoughts from the OB?

Posted by bapple
Capital City
Member since Oct 2010
12235 posts
Posted on 5/6/13 at 12:06 am to
IMO that puts it around the same level as a Kahr P380, but with a single-action trigger. I like it!

But I bet it's still gonna be expensive, although you do get what you pay for because it's a Colt.

Posted by jgthunt
Walker
Member since Feb 2010
2668 posts
Posted on 5/6/13 at 12:19 am to
I bet it MSRP's for around $649
Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
68093 posts
Posted on 5/6/13 at 12:21 am to
better than lady's carry pistol
Posted by LouisianaChessie
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since May 2010
2582 posts
Posted on 5/6/13 at 5:13 am to
I guess if you really like carrying the mustang but would like it to be lighter then this fits your bill. Still a hard pistol to hit with, a decent amount of recoil due to a really light gun, a questionably effective round, and a terrible capacity. And you're going to pay colt money.
Posted by Colt M4A1
Member since Jan 2013
986 posts
Posted on 5/6/13 at 6:01 am to
Will not buy
Posted by aVatiger
Water
Member since Jan 2006
27967 posts
Posted on 5/6/13 at 6:09 am to
First initial look I like it..
Posted by Colt M4A1
Member since Jan 2013
986 posts
Posted on 5/6/13 at 6:11 am to
Second look, its a .380

Pass
Posted by chrisman17
New Orleans, LA
Member since Dec 2007
1008 posts
Posted on 5/6/13 at 6:14 am to
Not really a fan of the 9mm short, but I like the implications here... Poly Pony 1911 on the horizon??? hmmmmmm....
Posted by MrCoachKlein
Member since Sep 2010
10310 posts
Posted on 5/6/13 at 6:16 am to
I want a review between this and sig's 938
Posted by GaryMyMan
Shreveport
Member since May 2007
13499 posts
Posted on 5/6/13 at 7:28 am to
quote:

I want a review between this and sig's 938

The comparison would be with the p238 (.380) not the 938 (9mm). Colt's aluminum frame Pocketlite Mustang 380 is already about 2 oz lighter than the 238 - 12.5 vs 15.2 - so I am curious how much the polymer shaves off that.

I'm not sure why they had to make it so ugly though. The square trigger guard and half-arse accessory rail (?) sure screw up the Mustang's normally good ergonomics. One of the advantages the Mustang had over the 238 was that it was rounded off and good looking.
This post was edited on 5/6/13 at 7:41 am
Posted by MrCoachKlein
Member since Sep 2010
10310 posts
Posted on 5/6/13 at 7:56 am to
938 was the first one that came to mind when I thought "mini" 1911's. Interesting option for cc
Posted by Springfield XD
Member since Feb 2013
1782 posts
Posted on 5/6/13 at 8:03 am to
I like the SA but how does the size compare to an LCP and LCR?
Posted by bapple
Capital City
Member since Oct 2010
12235 posts
Posted on 5/6/13 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

The comparison would be with the p238 (.380) not the 938 (9mm). Colt's aluminum frame Pocketlite Mustang 380 is already about 2 oz lighter than the 238 - 12.5 vs 15.2 - so I am curious how much the polymer shaves off that.



Interesting points. I didn't realize there was that big of a weight difference.

But I did already know that Sig took Colt's patent when it ran out. You can literally take the slide from a Colt Mustang and stick it on a P238. Aside from aesthetics, they are identical.

quote:

I'm not sure why they had to make it so ugly though. The square trigger guard and half-arse accessory rail (?) sure screw up the Mustang's normally good ergonomics. One of the advantages the Mustang had over the 238 was that it was rounded off and good looking.


I'm thinking they had to do some redesigning on the inside to accommodate for the polymer frame. If you look at the internals of polymer-framed handguns, the slide still rides on metal. To create these inserts, they may have had to make the frame a bit bulkier.
Posted by SmackoverHawg
Member since Oct 2011
31654 posts
Posted on 5/6/13 at 12:11 pm to
Looks bigger than my Kahr.
Posted by TigerOnThe Hill
Springhill, LA
Member since Sep 2008
7592 posts
Posted on 5/6/13 at 12:17 pm to
Interesting to some I'm sure, but not me. First, a 380 is my concealed carry caliber of last resort. Second, I only pocket carry 380's; if I can carry the gun IWB, it'll be a 9mm instead of 380. Third, I'm have safety concerns and worry about snagging on the draw when carrying a single action cocked and locked in a pocket. Neverthelss, if the gun is a quality piece, I bet it'll sell well.
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
39910 posts
Posted on 5/6/13 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

The comparison would be with the p238 (.380) not the 938 (9mm). Colt's aluminum frame Pocketlite Mustang 380 is already about 2 oz lighter than the 238 - 12.5 vs 15.2 - so I am curious how much the polymer shaves off that. I'm not sure why they had to make it so ugly though. The square trigger guard and half-arse accessory rail (?) sure screw up the Mustang's normally good ergonomics. One of the advantages the Mustang had over the 238 was that it was rounded off and good looking.



Excellent post.

I am plagiarizing and sending to Guns & Ammo.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram