re: Your data suggest a moderate automatic preference for White people over Black people.

Too much effort needed. Fuggit. I already know I'm racist. All you white, black, mexican, & asian assholes took over our country and murdered all my people. I hate all of ya.

quote:

---

If they reversed them I bet the conclusion would be reversed to say we slightly prefer African Americans

---

They've done this a ton of different ways (e.g., priming) and the results almost always come out summarily, for all races taking these test.

It says I have a strong preference for white people. Such crap. I was slower for white,bad because they reversed it immediately and it took a bit to get used to the different finger. Wow this is so bogus.

quote:

---

lol i'm black LINK

that's a badly programmed test they are tying the response time to your natrual preferences when in reality the response time is tied to memory


a better algorhtim would have been to to let users first determine what is good and what is bad then give pictures of various people doing various things and let them determine of those things are good or bad and have each answer weighted similar to the Myers briggs personality tests are


lol this is waht you are paying for at harvard shite tier algorithms

---

Agree. They train you to match up a certain set of pictures/words. Then you have to unlearn it for the switch.

I did the Bush/Obama one but the same principle applies.

My results said I had no automatic preference to one race over the other. I'm now going to lord that over you philistines.

quote:

---

Jordan Peterson talked about this very thing on Joe Rogan's shows.

There are no facts are science to back this shite up.

---

Actually there is, but it's not a strong relationship between implicit bias and explicit beliefs or actions.

This test is freaking retarded. Of course I was quicker in responding when white and good were the same key - because that is what was presented first, so my mind was trained to answer quickly. Once it was switched around a few times, I had to think a bit more to keep the options straight in my head. If they had first assigned black and good to the same key, then switched it around for white, my answers would have been slower for white/good. That's common sense.

Odds on which OT member had his wife take this test and it says highly prefers dark skin

quote:

---

You think the women that saw the mongol hordes bearing down on them thought "well don't they just look like nice fellows. I love horsies."

---

it's the same reason why guys do better in big towns and women do better in small towns


women aren't racist they are hypergamous

hyergamy meaning that in laymens terms, a person, in this instance a woman will always settle on the best that she can get. A woman is genetically programmed to want the best for her and her offspring.


men on the other hand, especially the men who aren't at the very top, want the pool as shallow as it can possibly be. They want to exclude as many other men possible from the dating pool because the above avg looking but not drop dead gorgeous hot shite together woman is the exact woman that the men outside of the gene pool that are being picked up.


In the 50s an OT8 really didn't have much of a choice but to date what was in her area and what was on her side of town. That solely and directly benefited the men of that race who didn't have to become OT ballers to bang OT8s on the reg, not being a deadbeat going to church and having a steady job was probably good enough to get Miss 50s OT8. With the advent of the internet, social media, and a more care free attitude towards race relations has flooded the dating pool with competition. Men in turn, turn to "it's good to stick to your own kind" mantra that suits his needs (wants) best.


With capitalism comes womens rights and with womens rights comes hypergmany on a scale that we've never experienced. If women have stuck to their own kid in the past it's always been because they were second class citizens, treated as property or / and feed propaganda to keep them in line.


If an OT 6 has the chance to date a OT baller 8 who is hispanic instead of an OT 6 who is white she's going to chose the OT 8. Understand that we are making a very gray issue here black and white what makes something better for someone might not make it better for someone else. For insteance my following horse racing has always scored me well with women of various races that are track girls it's not about money or looks just per say.


To take it a step further and to futher prove the point, not only do people in general its not only race but southerns, specifically, don't like northerners or people from the west coast even if they are the same race. Because they are afraid they bring something to the table rather it be style, culture, money or whatever, that they are not able to bring.


In the bible Samson (black) married the Palestinian woman from Timnah and they gave the same tired arse argument that you're trying to give now. Samson was litarlly the biggest, baddest MF on the block and she could get him and she got him. On the other hand, Abraham wouldn't let Issac marry a Canaanite woman / made him marry someone from abrahams home tribe (stick to your own kind), Then Issac told jacob, do not marry a Canaanite woman (stick to your own kind). You think those Canaanite hoes gave a shite where the dick came from as long as they had goats and cattle and maidservents? they didn't.


Racism (shrinking the possible gene pool) is the natural reaction to hpergamy (expanding the gene pool)

quote:

---

Your data suggest a slight automatic preference for African Americans over European Americans.

---

Test is pretty much crap though.