- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Your car is stolen and gets in a wreck
Posted on 8/3/20 at 10:02 pm to YF12
Posted on 8/3/20 at 10:02 pm to YF12
No it’s that most everyone thinks they have a handle on how insurance works and they have no clue.
Most of these boneheads have no idea if their policies and/or the language in them are different because they haven’t read them.
Most of these boneheads have no idea if their policies and/or the language in them are different because they haven’t read them.
Posted on 8/3/20 at 10:10 pm to Dizz
quote:
Owner’s insurance is not on the hook
Then how is it covered? Obviously someone stealing a car is a loser thus probably is uninsured.
Is the cars owner stuck paying a car note for a destroyed car?
Posted on 8/3/20 at 10:29 pm to Tempratt
It’s not covered. If you have theft coverage your policy will cover it.
Posted on 8/3/20 at 10:34 pm to Dizz
Comprehensive covers your car if it’s not recovered, damaged, or destroyed.
Doesnt matter if the thief is insured your policy will deny liability for damages caused by the thief because the car was stolen.
Doesnt matter if the thief is insured your policy will deny liability for damages caused by the thief because the car was stolen.
Posted on 8/3/20 at 11:17 pm to Janky
Your insurance is on the hook for damage to your wrecked vehicle, thats it....assuming you had comprehensive coverage. If you didn’t carry comp, your insurance isn’t on the hook for a dime
You aren’t liable for the actions of a car thief. The people he wrecked into would have to collect from the thief...good luck with that
You aren’t liable for the actions of a car thief. The people he wrecked into would have to collect from the thief...good luck with that
This post was edited on 8/3/20 at 11:18 pm
Posted on 8/3/20 at 11:19 pm to Tempratt
quote:If you’re still paying a note, you should still have full coverage. Comprehensive coverage will pay the vehicle owner for the theft claim. If you don’t carry comprehensive and your car gets stolen, you’re SOL
Then how is it covered? Obviously someone stealing a car is a loser thus probably is uninsured.
Is the cars owner stuck paying a car note for a destroyed car?
This post was edited on 8/3/20 at 11:20 pm
Posted on 8/3/20 at 11:54 pm to Janky
Hope you filed a police report on the stolen vehicle before the wreck occurred.
Posted on 8/4/20 at 12:33 am to fallguy_1978
quote:
You are subject to a lawsuit checking your mail in Louisiana.
Look, I don’t mean to pile on here but I‘m ready suing the OP for starting this thread.
Posted on 8/4/20 at 12:55 am to Janky
Not a permissive use = no coverage on liability. You still have comp and collision.
This post was edited on 8/4/20 at 12:56 am
Posted on 8/4/20 at 2:24 am to CaptainsWafer
quote:
No it’s that most everyone thinks they have a handle on how insurance works and they have no clue.
I want to live in a world where people STFU when they don't know wtf they are talking about.
And, to answer the op's question: your homeowner's policy will cover everything if it was stolen from inside an unlocked garage. If you have med pay, it will fix your car but not the thief's. If you have neither, your omission and error policy will cover all med mal and the theft of items in your trunk. Otherwise, the tortfeeder will be on the hook for your medicals.
You just need to get a wc atturney. This shite is definitely in the scope of the course of your life, and the thief should be able to collect if he saw some outrageous shite when he hit the family in the minivan. Then, if you properly file your financing statement and attachments with the clerk of state, the tax assessor will just subtract the amount of your damages from your ad valorems, to figure out the diminution that occurred when the thief was rear ended, and you'll have a conventional mortgage in the record.
You definitely need a bankruptcy atturney if you happen to let the car sit in your neighbor's yard for 30 years, otherwise, he will aquisitively prescribe your car from you if you have a mercantile title.
My cousin's neighbor went through this shite last winter, and he didn't even need an attorney. You can probably handle it all by yourself.
Unless it is commingled separate property, purchased by your wife with her pain and suffering accord and satisfactory work performed via a warranty waiver.
You'll definitely need a notary to make sure everything is legit though. Just sign it with your witness watching and find you a bank to swear an oath.
How many miles were on the car?
Posted on 8/4/20 at 2:51 am to Janky
Louisiana: All auto liability policies specifically exclude coverage if the vehicle is stolen. Vehicles are covered, not drivers. Specific drivers can be included in or excluded from coverage on the vehicle. Vehicle is covered for a borrower driver only unless the owner negligently entrusts the vehicle to the borrower, for example, owner knows borrower is shite-faced or that the borrower doesn't know how to drive. Owner is still covered for negligent entrustment; that's why in excluded driver cases, we try to find some form of negligent entrustment; it's a back door to coverage. Borrower not having a valid driver's licence is not negligent entrustment in and of itself.
You can buy uninsured motorists' coverage for property damage, but usually comprehensive and collision is better and covers all risks of damage, not just damage caused by an uninsured driver.
Source: me. 35 years in personal injury practice; no billboards, however. I do not like lawyer billboards or busses, bus stops, T.V. ads, etc.
I'm retired now, but my license is still active.
Caveat: None of this post is offered as legal advice to anyone, and poster assumes no responsibility or liability for any of the discussion or statements herein. These types of cases are highly fact specific and all readers should personally consult with an attorney for legal advice based on the specific facts regarding any accident.
Good night. I'm going to bed now. I don't have to get up early in the morning.
You can buy uninsured motorists' coverage for property damage, but usually comprehensive and collision is better and covers all risks of damage, not just damage caused by an uninsured driver.
Source: me. 35 years in personal injury practice; no billboards, however. I do not like lawyer billboards or busses, bus stops, T.V. ads, etc.
I'm retired now, but my license is still active.
Caveat: None of this post is offered as legal advice to anyone, and poster assumes no responsibility or liability for any of the discussion or statements herein. These types of cases are highly fact specific and all readers should personally consult with an attorney for legal advice based on the specific facts regarding any accident.
Good night. I'm going to bed now. I don't have to get up early in the morning.
This post was edited on 8/4/20 at 9:41 pm
Posted on 8/4/20 at 6:47 am to Janky
This happened to me in 2017 in Louisiana. Totaled my truck. No one was hurt. Comprehensive covered it.
Posted on 8/4/20 at 7:20 am to Tyga Woods
quote:
The car is insured, not the driver.
Wow...
Posted on 8/4/20 at 7:20 am to Janky
I love it when this crowd wants to play perry mason and expound on legal doctrine.
Shame on any attorney for responding to this gratuitously.
Shame on any attorney for responding to this gratuitously.
Posted on 8/4/20 at 7:26 am to Janky
Most policies cover both the vehicle (primary) and the driver (secondary). So if you are driving another’s vehicle with their permission and get in an accident, their insurance on the vehicle would pay out first and if there is liability left, your insurance would then pick it up.
However, most policies have an exclusion for non-permissive drivers which clearly include theft. So, under the policy, your insurance would not cover liability exposure for a third party.
Like others have said, you could use comprehensive coverage to cover certain other losses.
However, most policies have an exclusion for non-permissive drivers which clearly include theft. So, under the policy, your insurance would not cover liability exposure for a third party.
Like others have said, you could use comprehensive coverage to cover certain other losses.
This post was edited on 8/4/20 at 7:28 am
Posted on 8/4/20 at 7:27 am to Janky
Damage to your car while stolen is covered by comprehensive IF you carry comprehensive coverage. If not, you’re not covered.
Liability protects YOU from the damage/injuries YOU cause to the other party as a result of your negligence if you’re driving the vehicle. You are not responsible for damage/injuries to other parties caused by a driver who steals your vehicle.
Liability = pays for THEM
Collision/Comprehensive = pays YOU, minus whatever your deductible is
Liability protects YOU from the damage/injuries YOU cause to the other party as a result of your negligence if you’re driving the vehicle. You are not responsible for damage/injuries to other parties caused by a driver who steals your vehicle.
Liability = pays for THEM
Collision/Comprehensive = pays YOU, minus whatever your deductible is
Posted on 8/4/20 at 7:30 am to Janky
The owners will pay under comprehensive. If no comprehensive no coverage
The thief’s insurance will not pay, even if he has insurance, the thief does not have permission to drive the car so it will not qualify to be covered under that policy.
The thief’s insurance will not pay, even if he has insurance, the thief does not have permission to drive the car so it will not qualify to be covered under that policy.
Posted on 8/4/20 at 7:31 am to Giantkiller
quote:
Look, I don’t mean to pile on here but I‘m ready suing the OP for starting this thread.
I'm suing chicken for providing the platform to the OP.
Posted on 8/4/20 at 7:34 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
So if you are driving another’s vehicle with their permission and get in an accident, their insurance on the vehicle would pay out first and if there is liability left, your insurance would then pick it up.
Under the permissive use rule in Louisiana, if I borrow your car for something and wreck it, your policy covers it because I had permissive use at the time.
If I’m temporarily using your vehicle as a temporary substitute while mine is out of service due to a covered loss and I wreck your vehicle, MY policy serves as primary coverage and YOUR policy is secondary if there is any liability left after exhausting my limits.
Everyone in Louisiana who has a job, even part time, should have AT LEAST 50/100/50 along with 50/100 UM along with some collision and comprehensive coverage as well. I’d make an argument that 100/300/100 or higher is much more necessary, though. Soft tissue injuries such as ligaments and tendons occur frequently even in low-speed crashes and those can require surgery. Even a minor surgery can result in a $100,000 or more judgement/settlement. I’m not saying that’s warranted, just stating that it happens frequently.
This post was edited on 8/4/20 at 7:37 am
Posted on 8/4/20 at 7:50 am to Janky
quote:There will be no available insurance for any damage to third parties caused by the thief. The damage to your vehicle will be covered if you purchased the appropriate coverage.
Any actual lawyers know the answer?
Popular
Back to top



1







