- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:51 am to TiVoTiger
quote:
pocket calculator
Slide rules.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:56 am to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Man. You just keep bringing the hammer don't you?
You think I'm trying to get you with a gotcha or something? I'm just trying to understand where you're coming from because you don't seem to be understanding the differences between the two rockets and missions. You're using the argument of one to say the other didn't happen? I can't tell if you're doubling down on trolling or just being obtuse. Your hurling of insults at me is making it difficult to discern.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:28 pm to TigerGman
This mindset is blind to the fact that at the higher levels there is a lot of “collusion” between the decision makers.
We shipped gold to the Soviet Union as well as nuclear weapon technology to them to make sure we had a credible enemy to justify military expenditures.
-apologies, didn’t copy the post I was replying to….”why didn’t the Communist call us out for faking the moon landings.”
We shipped gold to the Soviet Union as well as nuclear weapon technology to them to make sure we had a credible enemy to justify military expenditures.
-apologies, didn’t copy the post I was replying to….”why didn’t the Communist call us out for faking the moon landings.”
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 12:30 pm
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:46 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
But we need 20X more fuel while in orbit to get us there and back.
show us how you arrived at this number.
and then I will show you how you're wrong.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 7:47 pm to Roughneck2020
quote:
LINK
Lots of reasons to have doubts. Listen to this Joe Rogan episode. It’s hard to argue shadows going different directions.
It's > 3 hours long. Can give a timestamp where the 'shadows' argument is?
Posted on 12/23/25 at 8:18 pm to wallowinit
quote:
Apollo could handle 100,000 lbs.
Found the idiot
quote:
The Apollo Saturn V rocket could carry a huge payload to the Moon, sending a fully fueled Command/Service Module (CSM) and Lunar Module (LM) weighing around 97,000 to 104,000 pounds (43,900-47,000 kg) to lunar orbit
quote:
Saturn V Capability: The massive Saturn V rocket was designed to send the combined Apollo spacecraft (CSM and LM) to the Moon, with a lunar payload capacity of about 96,800 lbs (43,900 kg) initially, increasing to around 103,600 lbs (47,000 kg) for later missions
Posted on 12/23/25 at 8:50 pm to Roughneck2020
quote:
Lots of reasons to have doubts
quote:
Listen to this Joe Rogan episode
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:06 pm to TigerGman
the biggest problem surrounding the moon landing isn't even getting there, it's how they got back
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:10 pm to TigerGman
Moon landing deniers and flat earthers are just things different groups of tards have come up with to signal to the rest of society that they’re tarded without having to come right out and say it.
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 10:10 pm
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:15 pm to DMAN1968
nm
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 10:19 pm
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:22 pm to Errerrerrwere
I'll make it easy for you.
Check out the difference in mass that lands on the moon. That's all you need to know - except some physics.
Check out the difference in mass that lands on the moon. That's all you need to know - except some physics.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:56 pm to wallowinit
quote:
except some physics.
You're a management consultant
Go steal somebody's time.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 11:29 pm to Errerrerrwere
you have no idea of my education and experience.
It sounds like you are afraid to address the 800 pound gorilla in your assertion.
how do you account for the difference in mass delivered to the surface of the moon?
Not to mention the difference in mass the comes back to earth.
It sounds like you are afraid to address the 800 pound gorilla in your assertion.
how do you account for the difference in mass delivered to the surface of the moon?
Not to mention the difference in mass the comes back to earth.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 11:57 pm to TiVoTiger
quote:I couldn't help but notice no one addressed this.
The simplest and most logical explanation is most often right: It simply didn’t happen.
Piece it together:
Apollo 13: Nine trips, no problem.
All technology destroyed: Why?
56 YEARS later: Not a single person, business, government, country has figured anything out.
The greatest technological advancements in history have happened after a pocket calculator got 9 missions to the moon with 6 landing on the surface and back, no prob.
All signs point to > Never happened to begin with
They want so bad to believe the impossible fairy tale of taking off, going to the moon, landing taking off again, flying back to Earth and doing it all in 6 days ... Like 9x.
I flew to Hawaii a few months back and that took me almost 2 days to get there. But you know..the moon and super fast rockets and black female janitors with slide rulers calculatin' the shite out of extraterrestrial trajectories and 2 second fuel burns to keep the ship from flying out of the solar system or into the sun.
These are the same people who tell you they can't define what a woman is in 2025.
This post was edited on 12/24/25 at 12:04 am
Posted on 12/24/25 at 1:40 am to wallowinit
quote:
Not to mention the difference in mass the comes back to earth.
Way easier coming back. Which I've already ascertained.
I've always held the premise that you are going to use the majority of the fuel to escape the earth.
The strawman you continue to argue is irrelevant.
My point is and has always been 20X MORE to fricking get there, kid.
You really aren't arguing anything I haven't already stated. Instead, you want to pick it to pieces with irrelevant bullshite that I've already said.
You don't sound any smarter even though you are trying to.
You're a management consultant, dude. Whatever the frick that is.
Posted on 12/24/25 at 2:13 am to TigerGman
What I can’t wrap my head around is the error free machining of all the parts that were pressurized on one side and exposed to a vacuum on the other. Then I think about the suits the astronauts wore and how all that had to seal. You gotta get equalized to a vacuum to open the lander door, then pressurize to dock with the orbiter.
I didn’t check all the pages so apologies if already stated
I didn’t check all the pages so apologies if already stated
Posted on 12/24/25 at 5:59 am to CAD703X
Explain why not a single person in all these decades has EVER come out and fessed up and said yes it was fake, and this is how we convinced hundreds if not thousands who were in on it to never ever fess up to the world's greatest lie...
This post was edited on 12/24/25 at 1:30 pm
Posted on 12/24/25 at 6:09 am to billjamin
quote:
Moon landing deniers and flat earthers are just things different groups of tards have come up with to signal to the rest of society that they’re tarded without having to come right out and say it.
Posted on 12/24/25 at 7:34 am to TigerGman
Your succinct quoting has convinced me I'm wrong.
Page 13 of 22
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News