- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: You get arrested if disrupt a Law Enforcement Operation
Posted on 1/27/26 at 9:28 am to Klark Kent
Posted on 1/27/26 at 9:28 am to Klark Kent
quote:
That’s great! I feel the same way when I end up on the opposite side of the argument from the Reddit filth like mmmmcum, lowTBoy, c on z, Wicked Wayz, Clark14, and yourself
I’m sure they’re all Rhodes scholars compared to you.
1
Posted on 1/27/26 at 9:28 am to Ingeniero
quote:
Oh well then if he's really frustrated it's ok if he shoved down bystanders
Nothing happens in a bubble dawg.
But keep on doing you.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 9:29 am to Purple Spoon
quote:
Most people see ICE as trying to remove illegal aliens and criminals. Something an overwhelming majority of America is in favor of
Yeahhhh I don’t think this is true anymore. Check the latest polls from damn near any polling outlet and they all say the same thing - support for ICE and the methods this administration has used to deport immigrants has fallen off a cliff.
Why do you think the Trump administration is making these public statements and relieving certain people of duty? Hint - it ain’t because things are going great.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 9:29 am to DonJuanDaMiles
good one, what else you got? Posted on 1/27/26 at 9:29 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
What principles do they have left?
Whatever Trump tells them to have at any given time.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 9:30 am to NawlinsTiger9
Democracy - 99 wolves and 1 sheep voting on what’s for dinner. Good luck.
This post was edited on 1/27/26 at 9:42 am
Posted on 1/27/26 at 9:31 am to Crowknowsbest
quote:
I don’t think that.
Then why the sensationalized language? It lessens your argument.
The argument that Pretti did not deserve to get killed is strong enough without either sensationalism or the dehumanization of LEOs.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 9:33 am to Lickitty Split
I've had a concealed carry permit for years. You are advised to provide immediate notification to law enforcement if you're armed during any interaction. When stopped in a vehicle, promptly tell the officer about the firearm.
Also, it’s just common sense to never physically approach or engage an officer while carrying. If you witness a violent incident involving police, keep your distance and do not interfere. You may observe or record from a safe distance but approaching or even physical confrontation is just not common sense.
Also, it’s just common sense to never physically approach or engage an officer while carrying. If you witness a violent incident involving police, keep your distance and do not interfere. You may observe or record from a safe distance but approaching or even physical confrontation is just not common sense.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 9:34 am to Purple Spoon
quote:
Something an overwhelming majority of America is in favor of.
Somewhat accurate.
quote:
Most people see ICE as trying to remove illegal aliens and criminals.
Inaccurate.
While the overwhelming majority of Americans want at least some illegal immigrants deported, the overwhelming majority do not want them all deported. Further, even before this last killing, the (narrow) majority already believed Trump was going too far with how he was handling the situation. I imagine that number is about to explode when the next round of polls come out. This was from over a month ago:
The immigration debate reminds me of the abortion debate, in that the tiny extremes make all the noise while the “moderate middle” constitutes the overwhelming majority.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 9:34 am to Crowknowsbest
quote:
I’m sure this will comfort the deceased’s loved ones
Funny, from what I have read, the deceased one's family didn't really support his going there.
But keep on supporting the actions that keep putting people at more risk. The pendulum effect you want is swinging the way you want. You can really be an internet edgelord then.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 9:34 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
Check the latest polls from damn near any polling outlet and they all say the same thing
Not a fan of polls but im sure there is truth to that. I will counter by saying that anyone who thought removing millions of illegals was going to clean and error free that you live in fantasy land. And if you accept that then you have to default to the question, why were they here to begin with.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 9:37 am to Purple Spoon
quote:
anyone who thought removing millions of illegals was going to clean and error free
Is the “error” in this scenario an unarmed American getting shot in the back of the head by federal agents?
That is unacceptable.
This post was edited on 1/27/26 at 9:38 am
Posted on 1/27/26 at 9:37 am to DonJuanDaMiles
quote:
Lots of dumb shite to unpack here. I’m sure we value courage so much because it’s so similar to stupidity which we loath.
People might comment on a video of my death saying he lived a good life. Doubt I’ll give a frick either way if I’m dead.
Killed is similar to murdered. This one you actually got right. But not everyone who’s killed was murdered. Using language like that to differentiate the two is exactly why I used it. It’s called communication, and when I do it I tend to do it purposefully
None of this makes any sense. Congrats on that.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 9:41 am to Purple Spoon
quote:
Not a fan of polls but im sure there is truth to that. I will counter by saying that anyone who thought removing millions of illegals was going to clean and error free that you live in fantasy land. And if you accept that then you have to default to the question, why were they here to begin with.
I think the “moderate middle” thought we would be deporting people convicted, or at least arrested, for serious criminal activity after entering the country. They weren’t expecting random housewives who have been here decades or college kids with spotless histories to get wrapped up in it. And if ICE was kicking in doors, it was to go after people wanted on serious felony warrants, not doing block by block roundups of people’s neighbors.
Per usual, the administration took something that, at its core, isn’t a bad idea and then fricked it up when it came to the practical application.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 9:44 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
Is the “error” in this scenario an unarmed American getting shot in the back of the head by federal agents?
That is unacceptable
If those are proven to be the circumstances, then yes I agree and those officers should be held accountable but I don't think it invalidates the entire operation.
And calling him unarmed is a big reach. Regardless if it is ultimately determined to be a justified shooting or not, the guy got into a physical altercation with a group of armed law enforcement officers while carrying a loarded firearm and wearing a tactical vest. It tragically cost him his life.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 9:45 am to UtahCajun
quote:
Then why the sensationalized language?
I don’t think my language has been particularly sensational. I think calling the ICE agent who shot this guy in the back of the head a undertrained dipshit is accurate. Even kind.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 9:48 am to Purple Spoon
quote:
And calling him unarmed is a big reach.
True or false: he was unarmed when he was shot and killed.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 9:53 am to Joshjrn
quote:
I think the “moderate middle” thought we would be deporting people convicted, or at least arrested, for serious criminal activity after entering the country. They weren’t expecting random housewives who have been here decades or college kids with spotless histories to get wrapped up in it. And if ICE was kicking in doors, it was to go after people wanted on serious felony warrants, not doing block by block roundups of people’s neighbors.
A WSJ op-ed from yesterday basically said the same thing: LINK
quote:
Overall, Ms. Noem says Immigration and Customs Enforcement has removed “murderers, pedophiles, rapists, gang members, and terrorists.” She told CBS that “70% of them have committed or have charges against them on violent crimes.”
It started out that way. At the beginning of 2025, 87% of ICE arrests were immigrants with either a prior conviction or a criminal charge pending, according to ICE data obtained by the Deportation Data Project. Only 13% of those arrested at the beginning of 2025 didn’t have either a conviction or a pending charge.
But the criminal share of apprehensions has declined as the months have gone on. By October 2025, the percentage of arrested immigrants with a prior conviction or criminal charge had fallen to 55%. Since October, 73% taken into ICE custody had no criminal conviction and only 5% had a violent criminal conviction, according to a Cato Institute review of ICE data.
Being here illegally is against the law, sure. Actually applying that enforcement is a different discussion. I guess we'll see how polling shifts as it continues.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 10:00 am to Lickitty Split
In Mississippi it’s
Interfering with the duties of a law enforcement officer
Interfering with the duties of a law enforcement officer
Posted on 1/27/26 at 10:02 am to Ingeniero
do the crime face the time
Page 12 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News