Started By
Message
locked post

Would you rather have a turbo(s) or 2 more cylinders?

Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:41 pm
Posted by CatsGoneWild
Pigeon forge, Tennessee
Member since Jan 2008
15200 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:41 pm
Would you rather have a smaller engine in a car/truck w/ turbo(s) or have a bigger engine?
Basically a 4 cylinder turbo vs v6
6 cylinder turbo/twin turbo vs a v8
Posted by Harry Caray
Denial
Member since Aug 2009
21045 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:44 pm to
Depends on your preferred balance between spending more money and caring what others think
Posted by Bedhog
Denham Springs
Member since Apr 2019
3741 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:45 pm to
more cylinders. The high heat associated with turbocharging wrecks the oiling systems
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
40322 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:46 pm to
Man, that's tough.

No 4cyl anything.

This takes some thinking:

quote:

6 cylinder turbo/twin turbo vs a v8



So Turbo/ Turbo S vs Corvette?

Supercharging the 8 makes a difference...
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
40322 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

The high heat associated with turbocharging wrecks the oiling systems



Was more true years ago, not so much now.
Posted by Harry Caray
Denial
Member since Aug 2009
21045 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

more cylinders. The high heat associated with turbocharging wrecks the oiling systems

Can you go into more detail here? I'll be in the market for a new vehicle pretty soon and I've considered the turbo (specifically ford's "ecoboost") but I'd like to hear both sides of the argument before making any moves
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
93541 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:49 pm to
don’t think you understand what a turbocharger does, baw
Posted by Bedhog
Denham Springs
Member since Apr 2019
3741 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

Was more true years ago, not so much now.

incorrect unless the vehicle has a pre/post lube oiling system. That engine oil is still sitting on that center bearing that is 1000 degrees once the motor is shut off.
Posted by Tigeralum2008
Yankees Fan
Member since Apr 2012
17754 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:52 pm to
2 more cylinders
Posted by Raleigh Tiger
Raleigh, NC
Member since Oct 2003
622 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:52 pm to
I have a 4cyl turbo now. The fricking turbo lag has almost gotten me killed multiple times. A minimum 6 cylinders is my requirement. It used to be 8, but my last car was a BMW and the 6 in that thing was the sweetest motor I ever had.
Posted by DCtiger1
Member since Jul 2009
11924 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:53 pm to
I'd rather have the prior generation M3 with the V-8 then the current generation M4 with the twin turbo V-6 even though the M4 is more powerful.

I prefer the sound of the V-8
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
139218 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:54 pm to
I prefer natural aspiration, but there are benefits to both
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
40322 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

incorrect unless the vehicle has a pre/post lube oiling system. That engine oil is still sitting on that center bearing that is 1000 degrees once the motor is shut off.



Man, I just don't see coking being an issue any more, like it was in the 80s.

I know lot of guys that track turbo cars and don't seem to have issues, granted they change the oil regularly. I think closer tolerance and lighter weight oils have all but alleviated this problem.

I've seen more heatsoak issues from supercharged V-8s, and even then, it is somewhat rare, and never on the street.

Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
139218 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:58 pm to
The sound of the M4's exhaust was so bad that BMW piped in fake exhaust notes through the speakers
Posted by Bedhog
Denham Springs
Member since Apr 2019
3741 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 2:59 pm to
the biggest thing as far as turbo technology in the war on coking is water cooling. It has helped tremendously but i've seen far to many cases of VW turbocharged motors with so much soot in the oilpan caused by turbo coking that the pickups couldn't get enough oilflow for the motor.

Track cars are a different story. You know those guys take extra critical care of their motors.
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
40322 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

many cases of VW turbocharged motors


Diesel cars? I'll admit, I don't know a lick about VWs.

I used track cars as an example of extreme duty, but I don't know anyone that has had turbo failure in a DD.

The early Turbo Trans-Ams (80-81) were notorious for failing just like you are describing, but that was a long time ago and it was GM.
Posted by Bedhog
Denham Springs
Member since Apr 2019
3741 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

Diesel cars? I'll admit, I don't know a lick about VWs.
nahh, petrol.

Posted by Ragnar Danneskjold
North of you
Member since Dec 2015
412 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:07 pm to
An LS-based V8 with the most expensive heads I can buy.

Like an LSX 454 or similar.
Posted by Dick Jacket
Member since Nov 2016
1587 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:07 pm to
More cylinders. My wife’s explorer with the 4 cyl EcoBoost is the biggest pos engine ever made. I’ll never buy another turbo charged small motor for a regular car. It may be a different calculus if it’s a Porsche, but a grocery getter turbo sucks arse.

I got the 5.0 in my new F150.
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
40322 posts
Posted on 9/24/19 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

nahh, petrol.


Dang, that's crazy.

That's got to be design issue? Recall deal, or did they fail at like, 100K out of warranty?
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram