- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Wisconsin Hospital Replaces All Anesthesiologists with CRNAs
Posted on 4/7/21 at 12:13 pm to 1BamaRTR
Posted on 4/7/21 at 12:13 pm to 1BamaRTR
quote:
It is a 2 year program (quite a few programs are mostly online) with one major board exam. That’s it.
It's actually a PHD program now, after a masters..
and you need more than 2 years of ICU nursing experience to get accepted into a school. It's not like some community college LPN program..
This post was edited on 4/7/21 at 12:18 pm
Posted on 4/7/21 at 12:17 pm to Hangover Haven
quote:
It's actually a PHD program now, after a masters..
You’re thinking of the DNP. Most NPs are just nurse practitioners not the Doctorate of nursing practice.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 12:19 pm to 1BamaRTR
Went back and re-read your post... I thought you were referring to CRNAs.. Sorry
Posted on 4/7/21 at 12:20 pm to UndercoverBryologist
quote:
But in every aspect of these discussions, I am always more interested in what do these people know practically speaking* versus what they were taught in school.
This is where many people are mistaken. That underlying physiology, pharmacology, pathology, anatomy, etc. is super important to understanding why things work the way that they do. There is a reason why even after four years of intensive medical schooling, doctors are not allowed to practice independently. Yet we allow people with 5% of the training/education to go and practice independently without oversight? Someone who got their schooling entirely online except for minimum clinical hours and were never an RN. When you don’t know what you don’t know, that is what causes patient harm, because you don’t know when you’re over your head.
quote:
If the MD has a substantially greater skillset, I will see the MD.
That is where you are mistaken, sir. Starting with the VA and Medicare/Medicaid, patients are being forced to see NPs and PAs before seeing the doctor or in the place of doctors. No one deserves to have the choice of their provider taken away from them, especially not people who have served our country. This is now creeping into the private world. When the front desk lies to you and says that you can see the mid-level sooner and that they do the same thing as a doctor, keep in mind the training and know that if you stand your ground you will get to see the doctor. If not you need to find a different physician.
quote:
If the skillset is not that substantially different, and the NP/PA is cheaper, I would weigh my options and *probably* consider the mid-level provider.
I am a doctor and I will go see a mid-level for a medication refill or a URI but that is it. The skill set is not the same, and in most cases you are paying the same co-pay. The only person who profits from the encounter is the corporate medical group.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 12:22 pm to cwil177
You do understand how insurance rates are set, right?
Posted on 4/7/21 at 12:22 pm to armsdealer
quote:
"mid-level provider" isn't a thing, anywhere but reddit
What are you trying to say here? Mid level providers are indeed “a thing” in every hospital I’ve been around recently and an increasing number of clinics and MD offices.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 12:26 pm to saderade
quote:
Agree completely that NP training is not sufficient for any type of independent practice without some type of physician supervision or over site. I don’t see how anyone can say otherwise to be honest.
Exactly. It’s not an honest argument if we are looking at facts. It’s born of corporate greed so that hospital systems can provide a cheaper option to the patient and say “we are giving you the same thing!” It’s only cheaper for the hospital, and costs the patient much much more in immediate and downstream effects.
As they say, a fool and his money (and health) are easily parted.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 12:28 pm to cwil177
My brothers friend is an anesthesiologist, and the way he described the job was something like "99% monotony and 1% sheer terror, when something goes wrong".
Posted on 4/7/21 at 12:29 pm to Chucktown_Badger
quote:
99% monotony and 1% sheer terror
Sounds like most high paying jobs.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 12:32 pm to Chucktown_Badger
quote:
"99% monotony and 1% sheer terror, when something goes wrong".
When I was deciding what to do when I grew up, I was looking at Anesthesia and someone said "It's pretty boring until you frick up".
Posted on 4/7/21 at 12:36 pm to 1BamaRTR
quote:
2 year program
Depends on the program and specialty, some are 3years and 1,000 in clinical rotation hours. I'm not saying it's comparable to residency, but it's not an all online program like some are suggesting.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 12:37 pm to Cs
My kid had tubes put in his ears a few years ago.
Anesthesiologist charged $700 to put a nitrous mask on his face.
Then charged another $700 because there are two ears, thus two procedures, although anesthesia was only administered once.
I reported her to my insurance company's fraud division.
Their answer: "Sorry Mr. Deeprig9, that's actually customary."
Here I am trying to save myself and my insurance company some money and get told it's normal.
We're all schmucks getting ripped off.
Anesthesiologist charged $700 to put a nitrous mask on his face.
Then charged another $700 because there are two ears, thus two procedures, although anesthesia was only administered once.
I reported her to my insurance company's fraud division.
Their answer: "Sorry Mr. Deeprig9, that's actually customary."
Here I am trying to save myself and my insurance company some money and get told it's normal.
We're all schmucks getting ripped off.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 12:37 pm to Cs
Looks like the price of healthcare finally caught up to healthcare professionals. I doubt the anesthesia fees are much less than previous but now the hospital gets to retain more money!!!
Fact. Billing practices at hospitals and other medical care facilities are frickin bannanas.
quote:
We're all schmucks getting ripped off.
Fact. Billing practices at hospitals and other medical care facilities are frickin bannanas.
This post was edited on 4/7/21 at 12:46 pm
Posted on 4/7/21 at 12:51 pm to Saskwatch
Jesus there are a lot of misinformed people of this thread. People saying things they have no clue about. CRNA here. AMA about surgery and anesthesia and I’ll answer truthfully regardless if you like the answer or not. I’ve practiced independently in Louisiana for 2 years. Currently practice in an anesthesia care team model.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 12:51 pm to Saskwatch
quote:
Fact. Billing practices at hospitals and other medical care facilities are frickin bannanas.
And people think their veterinarians are ripping them off.
'$300 and all they did was stick their thumb up my dog's arse!'
That be $3000 in human medicine.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 12:52 pm to Chucktown_Badger
quote:
My brothers friend is an anesthesiologist, and the way he described the job was something like "99% monotony and 1% sheer terror, when something goes wrong".
Sounds like police and firemen too.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 12:58 pm to kywildcatfanone
Paid not for what we do. Paid for what we know how to do when the time comes. 99% of the time it’s straight forward.
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:06 pm to cwil177
quote:
That’s your right as an informed patient, but they have increased adverse outcomes compared to anesthesiologists.
Paper 1
Paper 2
quote:
Adjusted odds ratios for death and failure-to-rescue were greater when care was not directed by anesthesiologists (odds ratio for death = 1.08, P < 0.04; odds ratio for failure-to-rescue = 1.10, P < 0.01), whereas complications were not increased (odds ratio for complication = 1.00, P < 0.79). This corresponds to 2.5 excess deaths/1,000 patients and 6.9 excess failures-to-rescue (deaths) per 1,000 patients with complications.
I can't argue with that
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:09 pm to cwil177
quote:
Yet we allow people with 5% of the training/education to go and practice independently without oversight?
I assume since they are giving medications like narcotics they'd have oversight regardless. It may be a doctor that isn't there, as I mentioned earlier, like how medics work, but there'd have to be a dr license to allow them to work under, correct?
Posted on 4/7/21 at 1:11 pm to Cs
just preparing for our govnt ran utopia of medicine.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News