- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Will Smith Murder Trial-Guilty of manslaughter and attempted manslaughter
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:26 am to Fun Bunch
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:26 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Haha. No.
in a heated argument, no contact made, its hard to make that case that Hayes wasn't the initial aggressor in that scene. but i'm just a smart dude with no legal background.
1
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:26 am to diat150
quote:
his leads me to believe that someone in the smith camp was threatening with a gun. they all say nothing about anyone having a weapon or mentioning a weapon but the witness on that recorded video at the scene describing what happened talks about both men talking about guns.
the prosecution is trying to paint the story as Hayes just ambushed with the gun. JMO
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:27 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
If that is the case, it makes it pretty easy. Ballgame.
Is the 911 tape going to be played for the jury?
I'm sure it will be. The 911 call was made by an off duty police officer who left the Half Moon, and walked towards the scene. He asked Cardell Hayes what happened while he was on the phone with 911, and you could clearly hear that statement made.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:29 am to Fun Bunch
quote:Haha, Ok
Haha. No.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:29 am to lsupride87
quote:
This is absolutely what Hayes should have done
Just like Smith shouldnt have driven drunk
And then shouldnt have hit and ran
This post was edited on 12/7/16 at 10:30 am
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:30 am to Chad504boy
quote:Eventhough it appears Smith and his shirtless aggressive friend approached Hayes vehicle?
in a heated argument, no contact made, its hard to make that case that Hayes wasn't the initial aggressor in that scene
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:30 am to lsupride87
State v Bell is a good case to look at I think.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:30 am to Fun Bunch
John Simerman ?@johnsimerman 5m5 minutes ago
Hernandez said the Smiths, he and his wife were only at Sake Cafe with Pierre Thomas, others for 20-30 minutes before drive downtown.
not likely will took 8 shots in 20 minutes.
Hernandez said the Smiths, he and his wife were only at Sake Cafe with Pierre Thomas, others for 20-30 minutes before drive downtown.
not likely will took 8 shots in 20 minutes.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:31 am to lsupride87
quote:
friend approached Hayes vehicle?
checking on the rear end bro, you can clearly see will's glasses fell off examining the benz bro.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:31 am to lsupride87
quote:
Eventhough it appears Smith and his shirtless aggressive friend approached Hayes vehicle?
Do you have anything to support the above being enough justification to shoot someone?
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:31 am to Chad504boy
quote:Well
not likely will took 8 shots in 20 minutes.
dat .240 bac doe
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:31 am to lsupride87
I think the disconnect in this thread is that some people are arguing about what they feel should be the right way to handle the situation as it is happening versus the people who are arguing the semantics of what makes the actions legal or not...
Hope that makes sense, it did in my head
Hope that makes sense, it did in my head
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:32 am to lsupride87
quote:
dat .240 bac doe
dat dead body test result.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:32 am to LNCHBOX
quote:Did I say it was?
Do you have anything to support the above being enough justification to shoot someone?
I was responding to the comment on who was the initial aggressor(i know i know it doesnt matter bunch)
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:32 am to Mr. Hangover
quote:
the people who are arguing the semantics of what makes the actions legal or not...
Isn't that what a trial is all about?
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:32 am to Chad504boy
quote:dat we really listening to red stick tigress doe?
dat dead body test result.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:32 am to lsupride87
John Simerman ?@johnsimerman 1m1 minute ago
Hernandez: "I never once lifted my hands up. I never once took a swing at him. He took a swing at me. He swung so hard he lost his balance."
Hernandez: "I never once lifted my hands up. I never once took a swing at him. He took a swing at me. He swung so hard he lost his balance."
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:33 am to lsupride87
The alcohol doesn't really interest me although I know you guys love to make a big deal of it.
He was drunk. He shouldn't have been driving.
So what? Even if he's drunk out there screaming at Hayes, it isn't particularly relevant.
He was drunk. He shouldn't have been driving.
So what? Even if he's drunk out there screaming at Hayes, it isn't particularly relevant.
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:33 am to lsupride87
quote:
dat we really listening to red stick tigress doe?
everyone in this thread listens to what fits their narrative. #truth
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:33 am to lsupride87
quote:yeah, I totally don't see this happening
or was he making the argument to please step back in his own defense?
Page 50 of 248
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News