Started By
Message
locked post

Why won't a train system like Europe ever worked in US?

Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:38 pm
Posted by theantiquetiger
Paid Premium Member Plus
Member since Feb 2005
20083 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:38 pm
fricking Amtrak is expensive as shite and limited. Hell, Baton Rouge doesn't even have a train station.

I just bought four business class tickets in Italy on their high speed train for $132 total.

Could you imagine living in BR and having an evening out in Houston or be in New Orleans in 30 minutes, because of a high speed rail service?

Why was this system never used in the US? Was the automakers behind this? Less trains, more cars to be sold?
This post was edited on 3/1/18 at 6:40 pm
Posted by WaltTeevens
Santa Barbara, CA
Member since Dec 2013
12045 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:39 pm to
Cause no Hitler over here
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
26627 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:39 pm to
quote:

Why won't a train system like Europe ever worked in US?



Yes. In the Northeast Corridor it works very well. At least when it's not crashing in Philly.

LINK

The Acela Express and the Siemens ACS-64 are both impressive IMO. We've taken the ASC-64 between Philadelphia and NYC. It was a nice, fast ride.
This post was edited on 3/1/18 at 6:47 pm
Posted by ellishughtiger
70118
Member since Jul 2004
21182 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:41 pm to
Cause this is Merica, damnit!!!

West coast and North East trains are affordable and common. People down south would never want their tax dollars go toward such a progressive thing like this.
Posted by AbitaFan08
Boston, MA
Member since Apr 2008
27902 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:42 pm to
People use the train all the time here.

It’s easier to get from Boston to New York via Amtrak than it is to take a plane.

A lot of people prefer Amtrak to get to Philly and DC as well.

The train to Portland takes an hour and a half and is very cheap.

Obviously it’s not the high speed rails like in Europe though.
This post was edited on 3/1/18 at 6:43 pm
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
82435 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:42 pm to
quote:

Cause no Hitler over here



Trump wants to launch infrastructure improvements. And as the sky screamers pointed out, have you ever seen them together?
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122534 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:42 pm to
That would just be another public area some fricked up white kid would shoot up..
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:43 pm to
Because the density in Western Europe is 10 fold that of the US.

Germany is slightly larger than AL & MS but has the same number of people as California, Texas, and New York, combined.

Edited for more accurate reflection of the density.
This post was edited on 3/1/18 at 6:59 pm
Posted by theantiquetiger
Paid Premium Member Plus
Member since Feb 2005
20083 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:44 pm to
I understand it's big in the NE and NW (maybe) but why not nation wide? High speed trains between every major (and minor) city in the country. Use each major city as a hub.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Mackinac Island
Member since Jul 2009
38577 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:45 pm to
quote:

That would just be another public area some fricked up white kid would shoot up..

Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
44832 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:45 pm to
If someone could make money doing it, they would have already done it.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:45 pm to
How stupid. Trains are only economically viable in areas a lot more densely populated than anywhere in the us other than the NE and maybe sc.

So eager to type your bigoted quip that you exposed your hapless knowledge on the subject
Posted by momentoftruth87
Your mom
Member since Oct 2013
86110 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:46 pm to
because we are spread out and most have a vehicle. In Europe, there is not much space. Easier to use public transportation.
Posted by ThatMakesSense
Fort Lauderdale
Member since Aug 2015
15281 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:46 pm to
quote:


Germany is the same size as Alabama 


Not even close, Hombre.
Posted by Brazos
Member since Oct 2013
20557 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:47 pm to
Is that a fact about Germany? I knew it was condensed but I didn't think it was like that.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Mackinac Island
Member since Jul 2009
38577 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

Germany is the same size as Alabama

Closer to Texas.

eta- probably a bit smaller from this graphic but much larger than AL

This post was edited on 3/1/18 at 6:55 pm
Posted by AnonymousTiger
Franklin, TN
Member since Jan 2012
4863 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:47 pm to
Posted by ellishughtiger
70118
Member since Jul 2004
21182 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

gthog61


go post some racist memes in your safe space, cuck.
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122534 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:47 pm to
I was just joking... People got upset with that comment..
Posted by MikeyFL
Member since Sep 2010
10369 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:48 pm to
We don't have centralized populations within cities that have effective, clean, and efficient public transportation that can feed a larger rail system.

Instead, much of our infrastructure is almost entirely built on the concept of roadways connecting suburban environments with expansive yards.

Even in Taiwan, which has a much more centralized population than the US, high speed rail has struggled to be financially viable.

LINK

I'm saying this as someone who's lived in Hong Kong and loved the public transportation there. We just have a very different country, different living expectations, and different demographics.


This post was edited on 3/1/18 at 6:49 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram