Started By
Message

re: Why won't a train system like Europe ever worked in US?

Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:48 pm to
Posted by theantiquetiger
Paid Premium Member Plus
Member since Feb 2005
20083 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:48 pm to
quote:

If someone could make money doing it, they would have already done it.


I think it's the other way around. Major players would lose money, i.e. automakers and airlines. They lobby to keep the rail system down.
Posted by ellishughtiger
70118
Member since Jul 2004
21182 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:48 pm to
quote:

Germany


Not sure of the land size but it's easily the biggest country in western europe.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
111647 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:48 pm to
quote:

Cause no Hitler over here


Actually, he's sort of why we got the Interstates instead.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
79876 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:49 pm to
quote:

Not even close, Hombre.



3x's the size of Alabama.

Or half the size of texas.


But yes, population density is the reason they are not viable here.
This post was edited on 3/1/18 at 6:50 pm
Posted by ThatMakesSense
Fort Lauderdale
Member since Aug 2015
15281 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:49 pm to
quote:

Not sure of the land size but it's easily the biggest country in western europe


Germany would be top 5 if it were a state in America..it's close to Montana.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

People down south would never want their tax dollars go toward such a progressive thing like this.


Because it's not viable. You need a densely populated region.
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
33146 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

I think it's the other way around. Major players would lose money, i.e. automakers and airlines. They lobby to keep the rail system down.



The freight rail companies run the FRA.

Amtrak will never be efficient or competitive outside of the northeastern sections where they actually own the track.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Mackinac Island
Member since Jul 2009
38577 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

People got upset with that comment.

If you mean me that gif is hardly me getting upset.

I just thought it was out of left field.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
82443 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:52 pm to
Wouldn't be a good idea on the Gulf Coast. We would have to tear up ecologically sensitive areas to connect New Orleans to Baton Rouge and Biloxi.

We'd also have to either put a stop in every town so it never picks up speed, or have people from Kiln driving 25-30 miles east to the Biloxi train station...in which case they might as well just drive 50 to New Orleans. Same would go for Pascagoula/Mobile.
Posted by Lou Pai
Member since Dec 2014
29644 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

Cause this is Merica, damnit!!!

West coast and North East trains are affordable and common. People down south would never want their tax dollars go toward such a progressive thing like this


Lol what a dumbass. Trains are not economically suitable for rural areas like they are in the Northeast.
Posted by ellishughtiger
70118
Member since Jul 2004
21182 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:53 pm to
BR> NOLA speedrail was discussed before. I believe Jindal shut it down so he can build a fertilizer plant in Gramercy.
Posted by AbitaFan08
Boston, MA
Member since Apr 2008
27902 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:54 pm to
Because major cities are much, much more spread out than in the NE.
Posted by Lou Pai
Member since Dec 2014
29644 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:56 pm to
Yeah but he wants his ultra useful and practical BR>NOLA bullet train because progress and shite!
Posted by Tigertown in ATL
Georgia foothills
Member since Sep 2009
30429 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:57 pm to
quote:

probably a little smaller f


137K square miles in Germany
268K square in Texas

Your point was solid. Your backup was a bit off.
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:57 pm to
quote:

Not even close, Hombre.


You’re right. It’s closer to MS and AL combined.

The point still stands. The density of Germany is insane when compared to anywhere outside of DC to Boston in the US.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Mackinac Island
Member since Jul 2009
38577 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:57 pm to
quote:


137K square miles in Germany
268K square in Texas

Your point was solid. Your backup was a bit off

You missed my second edit.
Posted by Mr Sausage
Cat Spring, Texas
Member since Oct 2011
15863 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:58 pm to
Get ready for the Houston to Dallas train. 90 mins.
Posted by AbitaFan08
Boston, MA
Member since Apr 2008
27902 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 6:58 pm to
quote:

Get ready for the Houston to Dallas train. 90 mins.


Is the purpose of this train for each person to leave their respective city to tell the other city that their city sucks, then go home?
Posted by BRUNNIN4
CenTex
Member since Mar 2010
3162 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 7:02 pm to
quote:


Not sure of the land size but it's easily the biggest country in western europe.

France, Spain, Sweden, and Norway are all larger.
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
39568 posts
Posted on 3/1/18 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

Why was this system never used in the US?

I'm sure fricking liberals were at least partly to blame.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram