- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Why don't we privatize the military?
Posted on 10/26/17 at 2:29 pm
Posted on 10/26/17 at 2:29 pm
LINK
Spent time overseas and stateside, there are a lot of inefficiencies in the military. There is a reverse incentive running rampant to maximize your spending and spend your entire budget, so you can ask for an increase the following year.
Geaux America... but damn let's get efficient
Spent time overseas and stateside, there are a lot of inefficiencies in the military. There is a reverse incentive running rampant to maximize your spending and spend your entire budget, so you can ask for an increase the following year.
Geaux America... but damn let's get efficient
Posted on 10/26/17 at 2:31 pm to TheRustyShackleford
National defense is one of the few jobs of the federal government specified in the Constitution. I would suggest its their most important job. You want someone protecting you who's only in it for the money?
Posted on 10/26/17 at 2:31 pm to TheRustyShackleford
That is a terrible idea. Once you privatized the military completely, it would be entirely too easy to overthrow the government.
Posted on 10/26/17 at 2:32 pm to TheRustyShackleford
Because our government couldn't control it like they want to
And, think about some of the shitty work you see from lowest bidders on construction and stuff like that. Probably be similar.
And, think about some of the shitty work you see from lowest bidders on construction and stuff like that. Probably be similar.
This post was edited on 10/26/17 at 2:33 pm
Posted on 10/26/17 at 2:32 pm to TheRustyShackleford
Let's turn over our national security to the lowest bidder.
Sounds like a good idea to me...
Sounds like a good idea to me...
Posted on 10/26/17 at 2:32 pm to TheRustyShackleford
Because Elon Musk hasn't asked ywt
Posted on 10/26/17 at 2:32 pm to TheRustyShackleford
quote:
Why don't we privatize the military?
Sounds like the first step in our country being taken over by an enemy government or the premise to a Micheal Bay movie
Posted on 10/26/17 at 2:33 pm to TheRustyShackleford
How about we start with social security, baby steps.
Posted on 10/26/17 at 2:34 pm to TheRustyShackleford
There are plenty of other ways to make the country efficient without privatizing the military.
Posted on 10/26/17 at 2:34 pm to TheRustyShackleford
Just because something is private does not mean that it is efficient. A lot of perverse, dangerous incentives are set up by privatizing things that should not be private, e.g. the prison system. We clearly do not want the military's loyalty available to the highest bidder.
Posted on 10/26/17 at 2:35 pm to Brosef Stalin
quote:
National defense is one of the few jobs of the federal government specified in the Constitution. I would suggest its their most important job. You want someone protecting you who's only in it for the money?
This.
Posted on 10/26/17 at 2:36 pm to TheRustyShackleford
Do you even Hessian?
Posted on 10/26/17 at 2:37 pm to TheRustyShackleford
here's what Machiavelli has to say about it LINK
quote:
I say, therefore, that the arms with which a prince defends his state are either his own, or they are mercenaries, auxiliaries, or mixed. Mercenaries and auxiliaries are useless and dangerous; and if one holds his state based on these arms, he will stand neither firm nor safe; for they are disunited, ambitious and without discipline, unfaithful, valiant before friends, cowardly before enemies; they have neither the fear of God nor fidelity to men, and destruction is deferred only so long as the attack is; for in peace one is robbed by them, and in war by the enemy. The fact is, they have no other attraction or reason for keeping the field than a trifle of stipend, which is not sufficient to make them willing to die for you. They are ready enough to be your soldiers whilst you do not make war, but if war comes they take themselves off or run from the foe;
Posted on 10/26/17 at 2:42 pm to TheRustyShackleford
Military and defense contractors have been fleecing the taxpayers blind since the Cold War. Their allies in the mainstream media do a great job shilling for war and fearmongering the American people over third world goat herders in the Middle East and a country in Asia with a GDP less than Wyoming.
Our military is an exercise in corporatism and is as much about making a profit for a few hundred people as it is protecting us. A small number of defense contactors make billions off perpetual war and mass surveillance. The politicians who support said wars and surveillance get re-elected and the media's ratings and advertising revenues soar because people want to watch war on tv and are ok with their government spying on them so they feel safe.
Our military is an exercise in corporatism and is as much about making a profit for a few hundred people as it is protecting us. A small number of defense contactors make billions off perpetual war and mass surveillance. The politicians who support said wars and surveillance get re-elected and the media's ratings and advertising revenues soar because people want to watch war on tv and are ok with their government spying on them so they feel safe.
Posted on 10/26/17 at 2:44 pm to TheRustyShackleford
quote:
There is a reverse incentive running rampant to maximize your spending and spend your entire budget, so you can ask for an increase the following year.
The thought of privatizing the military is dumb as shite, however this part of your post is 100% true.
I worked as a salaried employee on a military contract years ago. While we got paid a salary, we charged our time as an hourly employee would because every hour was billed to "the customer." Every summer, we had to start working manadatory overtime whether there was work to be done or not, because if we budgeted for a certain number of hours to be billed at the end of the fiscal year, and we didn't hit or exceed that number, then our budget was required to be reduced the following year. We would literally show up on weekends and play board games and take 2 hour lunches in order to get the overtime in.
Posted on 10/26/17 at 2:45 pm to TheRustyShackleford
I dont think you know how capitalism works in America
Posted on 10/26/17 at 2:48 pm to Peazey
Agreed. You need proper controls in place to dictate what needs to be accomplished. Bidding for the cheapest work will not give the results needed.
As taxpayers, we should all want our hard earned dollars being spent in the best possible manner. I don't know if this would be the best choice, but I can say with certainty that what we have now is inefficient and damn near robbery of taxpayer dollars.
I'm very interested to see what other solutions are out there.
As taxpayers, we should all want our hard earned dollars being spent in the best possible manner. I don't know if this would be the best choice, but I can say with certainty that what we have now is inefficient and damn near robbery of taxpayer dollars.
I'm very interested to see what other solutions are out there.
Posted on 10/26/17 at 2:48 pm to TheRustyShackleford
quote:
Spent time overseas and stateside, there are a lot of inefficiencies in the military.
As shown here though, military members may not always be the smartest... :/
Posted on 10/26/17 at 2:53 pm to TheRustyShackleford
Because its a terrible terrible idea.
Popular
Back to top

45













