- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/18/17 at 12:51 pm to iPadThai
i think its great they get electric stuff to last longer and go farther, one day, in the future, they might be able to do it in an affordable way regular people can buy and not have batteries more toxic then nuclear waste filling up landfills to do it.
the batteries they used are not recyclable which is my real complaint with them. its the same with ethynol, it can replace gas but only by being twice as expensive to produce then gas and at the same time its very harmful to most engines that arent built specific to use them at a HUGE expense.
once again things that are supposed to be "green" and somehow make us less dependent on fossil fuels, end up being more costly as well as they create hazardous waste when the batteries must be replaced every so often so they are in fact worse then the fuels they want to replace
that said, i for one, think the trade off of not hearing those damn loud arse trucks on the road next to you all the time would be well worth the toxic waste they create from batteries piling up in land fills everywhere.
the batteries they used are not recyclable which is my real complaint with them. its the same with ethynol, it can replace gas but only by being twice as expensive to produce then gas and at the same time its very harmful to most engines that arent built specific to use them at a HUGE expense.
once again things that are supposed to be "green" and somehow make us less dependent on fossil fuels, end up being more costly as well as they create hazardous waste when the batteries must be replaced every so often so they are in fact worse then the fuels they want to replace
that said, i for one, think the trade off of not hearing those damn loud arse trucks on the road next to you all the time would be well worth the toxic waste they create from batteries piling up in land fills everywhere.
This post was edited on 11/18/17 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 11/18/17 at 12:54 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
The biggest knock against Tesla is that they are the poster child for corporate welfare.
Which is an idiotic take
Posted on 11/18/17 at 1:00 pm to keakar
Everything can be recycled. To say something cant be recycled is absurd.
Posted on 11/18/17 at 1:02 pm to iPadThai
quote:
It’s hilarious really watching these baws trying to cling on to the old world and justifying their way of thinking, when the world around them is changing rapidly. Get your heads out of the sand and open your eyes.
It's not all dumb iron you know... there's a world of "groundbreaking" technology and brilliant scientific minds in oil & gas that pushes the limits of what humans can do; things I'm sure you don't care understand (and don't deserve to) allowing you the things you love, such as your Musk wiener shaped dildo.
You deserve a slab of pipe dope in your panties.
Posted on 11/18/17 at 1:06 pm to Orange_and_Blur
Great another dumb alter
Posted on 11/18/17 at 1:07 pm to iPadThai
The CEO of one of the bigger oil companies in my town drives a Tesla P90D.
Smart oil workers are not worried about Tesla takin’ der jerbs
Smart oil workers are not worried about Tesla takin’ der jerbs
Posted on 11/18/17 at 1:10 pm to iPadThai
quote:
They get all defensive when Tesla comes out with something new and groundbreaking.
You mean when Tesla comes out with a picture of something new or groundbreaking?
Posted on 11/18/17 at 1:10 pm to iPadThai
Alternate fuel sources and ideas of progression are associated with that ultimate evil, liberalism.
This post was edited on 11/18/17 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 11/18/17 at 1:13 pm to dkreller
Basically the whole OP is speculative and a straw man.
I dislike Tesla because they are routinely late with new products and are grossly over valued as a company. I work in the tech industry, not the oilfield.
I dislike Tesla because they are routinely late with new products and are grossly over valued as a company. I work in the tech industry, not the oilfield.
Posted on 11/18/17 at 1:13 pm to Jason in BR LA
try reading up on it, those arent flashlight batteries they use and no they arent recyclable at all and yeas they are discarded as hazardous waste after.
that is how they get so much power out of them and also be light weight. because its a trade off of them getting the power and long life out of them by giving up using the type of batteries that are in any way recyclable.
that is how they get so much power out of them and also be light weight. because its a trade off of them getting the power and long life out of them by giving up using the type of batteries that are in any way recyclable.
Posted on 11/18/17 at 1:14 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
The biggest knock against Tesla is that they are the poster child for corporate welfare.
Name a single car manufacturer in this wonderful country that isn't. Just one.
Posted on 11/18/17 at 1:17 pm to Sao
quote:
Name a single car manufacturer in this wonderful country that isn't. Just one.
Name another one that couldn't survive their first year without government subsidies.
Posted on 11/18/17 at 1:24 pm to dkreller
quote:
Name another one that couldn't survive their first year without government subsidies.
Glad you said that.
Name a coal company that didn't need government to "survive"?
Name an oil company that can do business the way it demands without Washington. Does big oil use government monies for research and development? Sure they do.
You see, Tesla gets the Lib label because it's convenient to use the word as it's crutch. But there is almost nary an industry in the land that can say it doesn't rely on Washington to allow them to do business in the same manner. It's ALL government intervention and welfare. You just have to look at it through unbiased and bullshite eyes.
This post was edited on 11/18/17 at 1:25 pm
Posted on 11/18/17 at 1:24 pm to dewster
quote:
are grossly over valued as a company
You’re a tech and valuation expert? Impressive.
Posted on 11/18/17 at 1:27 pm to Sao
My comment went waaay over your head.
eta - Try reading it again, only this time without Tesla's penis in your mouth.
eta - Try reading it again, only this time without Tesla's penis in your mouth.
This post was edited on 11/18/17 at 1:29 pm
Posted on 11/18/17 at 1:29 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
Saleen
In 2014, Saleen entered into an agreement to expand vehicle distribution to include China.[16] In August 2014, Saleen unveiled an all-electric performance model, the FOURSIXTEEN.[17]
In 2016, There has been much talk among Saleen fans about the possibility of an all electric version of Saleen's signature car, the S7. There has been speculation that an electric version, being dubbed 'S7E', could possibly be under development utilizing drivetrain and electronics from the Tesla Model S platform. It has been noted that Saleen has previous experience with the Model S platform, in their modified version the Saleen GTX (Previously named the FOURSIXTEEN), which Saleen offers in their current product lineup. [18]
I don't have the time to dig but let's assume I can find definitive government subsidy on this, because we both know it's there.
Posted on 11/18/17 at 1:30 pm to dkreller
quote:
My comment went waaay over your head.
eta - Try reading it again, only this time without Tesla's penis in your mouth.
I like Tesla about as much as I like redneck idiots spewing nonsense.
Posted on 11/18/17 at 1:33 pm to Sao
Well then what about my post is confusing you?
Should I rephrase it?
Name another car company "in this wonderful country" that needed government subsidizes to start business operations.
Should I rephrase it?
Name another car company "in this wonderful country" that needed government subsidizes to start business operations.
This post was edited on 11/18/17 at 1:34 pm
Popular
Back to top


0





