- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why did Fuhrer Adolf Hitler hate the jews so much?
Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:10 pm to Gcockboi
Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:10 pm to Gcockboi
Germany’s defeat in WW1 left the country’s economy in shambles and the Weimer Republic form of government’s hold on power was tenuous, always feeling on the verge of collapse from Communist pressure. Farms, homes, and businesses were being seized by banks in foreclosure. The socialists were printing so much money that the resulting inflation caused the currency to become worthless, requiring wheelbarrows full of cash to buy bread. In addition, the Weimer era was marked by a major cultural revolution as Germany’s cities became centers for out homosexuals, swingers parties, and drug usage. Weimer era German cities very much resembled the 60’s counter-culture in the U.S. without all the great music, and the Communist protesting mobs were literally today’s ANTIFA.
The few small businesses doing well were typically owned by Jews. The banks foreclosing on homes and farms were owned by Jews. Most of the vocal communist sympathizers in the government and media were Jews. The people pushing for tolerance and acceptance of the new sexual trends and “depravity” were largely Jews. Many of the ANTIFA organizers that were rioting in the streets fighting the Nazi? Also largely Jewish.
So, they made easy scapegoats for the German people who were disgusted by the new “progressive” lifestyles, wanted law and order returned to the streets, were tired of seeing their homes and farms repo’d, and were scared of the Bolshevik Revolution spreading to their towns and cities. The Nazis helped sew the chaos by fighting with the ANTIFA in the streets. Then, they provided a scapegoat and a solution. Economically, it worked, by literally confiscating the wealth and land of the Jews and redistributing it to Germans. Germany’s economy exploded, but was completely reliant on spoils, requiring an expansionist mindset. Hitler didn’t want just Germany, he wanted all of Eastern Europe, and the World. His system couldn’t work without someone to blame, spoils to pilfer and redistribute, and a common enemy for his people to fear and channel their efforts to combat. This industrial-scale evil eventually reduced Germany, and most of Europe, to ashes and greatly strengthened Communism’s reach across the globe.
The few small businesses doing well were typically owned by Jews. The banks foreclosing on homes and farms were owned by Jews. Most of the vocal communist sympathizers in the government and media were Jews. The people pushing for tolerance and acceptance of the new sexual trends and “depravity” were largely Jews. Many of the ANTIFA organizers that were rioting in the streets fighting the Nazi? Also largely Jewish.
So, they made easy scapegoats for the German people who were disgusted by the new “progressive” lifestyles, wanted law and order returned to the streets, were tired of seeing their homes and farms repo’d, and were scared of the Bolshevik Revolution spreading to their towns and cities. The Nazis helped sew the chaos by fighting with the ANTIFA in the streets. Then, they provided a scapegoat and a solution. Economically, it worked, by literally confiscating the wealth and land of the Jews and redistributing it to Germans. Germany’s economy exploded, but was completely reliant on spoils, requiring an expansionist mindset. Hitler didn’t want just Germany, he wanted all of Eastern Europe, and the World. His system couldn’t work without someone to blame, spoils to pilfer and redistribute, and a common enemy for his people to fear and channel their efforts to combat. This industrial-scale evil eventually reduced Germany, and most of Europe, to ashes and greatly strengthened Communism’s reach across the globe.
Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:12 pm to SCLSUMuddogs
quote:
The Germans did get screwed at the end of the war, the penalties were far too harsh.
I wouldn’t go that far. The punishment certainly fit the crime. I would agree the harsh sanctions all but guaranteed a second WW with Germany leading the way. In that respect it was not smart. Amazing they were able to get their shite together in only 20 years
Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:19 pm to SCLSUMuddogs
quote:
The Germans did get screwed at the end of the war, the penalties were far too harsh.
It was payback for the harsh penalties imposed on France after the 1870 Franco-Prussian war. Anyway, after four years of what was the most brutal war in human history up to that time, the loser wasnt going to get off easy.
Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:22 pm to lsu1919
Pretty common belief in those days. Henry Ford was a believer in the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion"
Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:22 pm to kciDAtaE
I believe there was a ton of resentment and hatred built up in the German people against the corrupt Weimer Republic and its many big dog Jews. There was lots of corruption and neglect of the German people from 1919 - 1933. The Jewish overlords stuffed their pockets at the expense of the German people which resulted in intense hatred. When Germans regained power under Hitler, Jews were portrayed as a subhuman species that Germany needed to rid itself of. Jewish eradication wasn't just from hatred however, it was also done to cleanse the human species. To the Germans, it was nothing more than the way we spray for mosquitoes to kill them.
This post was edited on 12/17/20 at 1:40 pm
Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:23 pm to Gcockboi
quote:
Why did Fuhrer Adolf Hitler hate the jews so much?
Was the respect of his title necessary in the thread title?
Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:29 pm to Hot Carl
quote:
What definition are you using, exactly? If we’re being literal, he lost the war, his power, his mind, his life. Seems like a lot of losing to me.
I mean shite....is Jim Kelly a loser?
He lost 4 straight Super Bowls and then had terrible health problems and had to live Buffalo.
No of course not, hes one of the 20-30 best QBs of all time.
And mean Hitler lost all that shite in basically one swoop. And he had to win like 100 things in a row to even get to the point to lose all that.
Is Kurt Cobain a loser? He lost his mind/career/life/family
This post was edited on 12/17/20 at 1:33 pm
Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:38 pm to kciDAtaE
quote:
The punishment certainly fit the crime.
I don’t see why Germany was any worse of an offender than France or Britain save for shipping Lenin over to Russia.
Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:39 pm to Gcockboi
The Khazarian jews were known to be Satanist & Kiddie didlers.
Maybe thats why?
Maybe thats why?
Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:41 pm to kciDAtaE
quote:
You don’t see the Jewish star on the hat?
OH!
Yes, that explains it. That's a female Jewish person.
Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:42 pm to Nawlens Gator
Our post-modern progressive history only seems to look at the evils it can take advantage of in order to push the narrative it wants. Often, these evils are motivated by somewhat lesser evils that prior befell the evil oppressors.
People remember the evils of Jim Crow, but not Reconstruction, when the overwhelming majority of people in the southern were stripped of their rights to vote along with their land. It was seen as justified to right the wrongs of Slavery and the Civil War, but it motivated the counter-revolution that was the KKK and Jim Crow laws enforcing segregation.
We remember the suburbanization of America as whites fled the cities during integration, but ignore the unprecedented crime wave and forced bussing that proceeded that migration.
We remember the Trail of Tears, but not the countless frontier massacres that motivated it.
The wrong thing is still the wrong thing, but people are not typically straight evil or good. There is nuance in every person and in every situation. Understanding the context of these causes, effects, and reactions are what learning history SHOULD be all about.
Post-modernism is only about destruction. Thus, it seeks to vilify and destroy, not to educate. It seeks to uproot the fabrics of society so that they can be replaced with whatever new ideal is trendy at the time.
People remember the evils of Jim Crow, but not Reconstruction, when the overwhelming majority of people in the southern were stripped of their rights to vote along with their land. It was seen as justified to right the wrongs of Slavery and the Civil War, but it motivated the counter-revolution that was the KKK and Jim Crow laws enforcing segregation.
We remember the suburbanization of America as whites fled the cities during integration, but ignore the unprecedented crime wave and forced bussing that proceeded that migration.
We remember the Trail of Tears, but not the countless frontier massacres that motivated it.
The wrong thing is still the wrong thing, but people are not typically straight evil or good. There is nuance in every person and in every situation. Understanding the context of these causes, effects, and reactions are what learning history SHOULD be all about.
Post-modernism is only about destruction. Thus, it seeks to vilify and destroy, not to educate. It seeks to uproot the fabrics of society so that they can be replaced with whatever new ideal is trendy at the time.
Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:43 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
I don’t see why Germany was any worse of an offender than France or Britain save for shipping Lenin over to Russia.
Three reasons.
1. France was the "leading" partner of the Entente
2. The vast majority of fighting on the Western Front took place in France and Belgium
3. Of the 9 million French soldiers mobilized between 1914-1918, some 6.6 million were either killed or wounded
France already had revenge on their mind after they got taken to the woodshed by Germany in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-71.
Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:52 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
don’t see why Germany was any worse of an offender than France or Britain save for shipping Lenin over to Russia.
I feel Germany bears the most responsibility for the War. They backed and even pushed Austria-Hungary to escalate things with Serbia knowing full well what would happen. Also Germany declaring war on Russia and France was another huge step in escalating the conflict. Then they killed a bunch of people
All the while, Germany had the power to stop all of this from happening.
Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:55 pm to kciDAtaE
quote:
They backed and even pushed Austria-Hungary to escalate things with Serbia knowing full well what would happen.
There was no guarantee the Russian Empire would mobilize. The Kaiser thought (or rather hoped) that the war between Austria and Serbia would be a short, localized conflict that would barely register as a blip in European history. When Tsar Nicholas II announced he was mobilizing his army to protect Serbia it caught just about everyone off guard.
Posted on 12/17/20 at 2:28 pm to kciDAtaE
quote:
The punishment certainly fit the crime
What was the crime?
Phosphene Gas? While the Germans were 1st, the allies used mustard gas heavily throughout the conflict.
War Mongering? Kaiser Wilhelm: Until 1914, he was described as 'The Apostle of Peace' or the 'Peace Kaiser' who had spent his twenty-six reign attempting to improve the lives of his people and to maintain good relations with his neighbours. Even on the eve of the war, he was desperately seeking some means to resolve the international crisis which had suddenly been blown out of all proportion following the murder of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. He was the last of the European leaders to mobilise his army, and as one American commentator observed he was 'the most sorrowful man in the world' when he realised that war could not be avoided.
War profiteering? The war crippled the German economy, civilians were starving in the streets in the months leading to end of the war. In the end they were also hit with $249 Billion in modern day restitution dollars.
While the western propaganda certainly made Germany out to be the Huns in WW1, they weren't doing anything that everyone else wasn't. WW2 also muddles the issue, because Germany was a very clear bad guy in that situation.
Posted on 12/17/20 at 2:55 pm to SCLSUMuddogs
The only thing that muddies WWII is how evil the Soviet Union was on the allied side, but at the start of the war, Germany and the USSR were on the same side.
This post was edited on 12/17/20 at 3:03 pm
Posted on 12/17/20 at 3:12 pm to kingbob
quote:
The only thing that muddies WWII is how evil the Soviet Union was on the allied side, but at the start of the war, Germany and the USSR were on the same side.
That wasn't what I meant.
WW2 Germany was the obvious bad guy. WW2 overshadows WW1. People think of the world wars and they think Nazi's and concentration camps. It makes the WW1 germans easier to call the bad guys
Posted on 12/17/20 at 3:25 pm to lsu1919
For Europeans in general, a few reasons. The first is obviously the the Jews and their part of killing Christ in scripture.
The second is if you ever read histories on sieges, without fail, there's always a Jew shooting messages to the enemy about supplies, morale, and personnel along with deployments over the wall.
Now why is it always a Jew? There's plenty of cowards among the defenders. But literate and knowledgeable cowards are harder to come by. Which ties into the real classical reason. The Jews by virtue of a different education filled necessary monetary and logistical holes in king's admins. They were also a insular group and easily pillaged even though they controlled certain functions when someone needed a scapegoat and some gold. Which lead to them being chased around.
So instead of being a just once thing like the Templars. Everybody got in on the act at some point or another.
So Hitler's stuff was nothing new, just surprising by the industriousness of it since he more or less launched it with "the Jews were shooting messages over the walls again that's why we lost the war!"
The second is if you ever read histories on sieges, without fail, there's always a Jew shooting messages to the enemy about supplies, morale, and personnel along with deployments over the wall.
Now why is it always a Jew? There's plenty of cowards among the defenders. But literate and knowledgeable cowards are harder to come by. Which ties into the real classical reason. The Jews by virtue of a different education filled necessary monetary and logistical holes in king's admins. They were also a insular group and easily pillaged even though they controlled certain functions when someone needed a scapegoat and some gold. Which lead to them being chased around.
So instead of being a just once thing like the Templars. Everybody got in on the act at some point or another.
So Hitler's stuff was nothing new, just surprising by the industriousness of it since he more or less launched it with "the Jews were shooting messages over the walls again that's why we lost the war!"
Posted on 12/17/20 at 4:01 pm to kingbob
quote:
So, they made easy scapegoats for the German people who were disgusted by the new “progressive” lifestyles,
The Jews were an easy scape goat for Europeans everywhere for ever. Whatever vices that were attached to them in post war Germany need to be taken with a grain of salt
It’s wild but it stems from them being able to charge interest on non-Jews while Islam and Christianity forbid usury of any kind. So if you wanted access to capital, you had to go to a Jew.
This post was edited on 12/17/20 at 4:02 pm
Posted on 12/17/20 at 4:10 pm to IIxxBREADxxII
quote:
What baffles me even more is that Hitler was pushing for a blonde hair blue eyes super race but he didn't have blonde hair or blue eyes.
That's a deep hole to dive in right there.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News