Started By
Message

re: Why did Fuhrer Adolf Hitler hate the jews so much?

Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:10 pm to
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67079 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:10 pm to
Germany’s defeat in WW1 left the country’s economy in shambles and the Weimer Republic form of government’s hold on power was tenuous, always feeling on the verge of collapse from Communist pressure. Farms, homes, and businesses were being seized by banks in foreclosure. The socialists were printing so much money that the resulting inflation caused the currency to become worthless, requiring wheelbarrows full of cash to buy bread. In addition, the Weimer era was marked by a major cultural revolution as Germany’s cities became centers for out homosexuals, swingers parties, and drug usage. Weimer era German cities very much resembled the 60’s counter-culture in the U.S. without all the great music, and the Communist protesting mobs were literally today’s ANTIFA.

The few small businesses doing well were typically owned by Jews. The banks foreclosing on homes and farms were owned by Jews. Most of the vocal communist sympathizers in the government and media were Jews. The people pushing for tolerance and acceptance of the new sexual trends and “depravity” were largely Jews. Many of the ANTIFA organizers that were rioting in the streets fighting the Nazi? Also largely Jewish.

So, they made easy scapegoats for the German people who were disgusted by the new “progressive” lifestyles, wanted law and order returned to the streets, were tired of seeing their homes and farms repo’d, and were scared of the Bolshevik Revolution spreading to their towns and cities. The Nazis helped sew the chaos by fighting with the ANTIFA in the streets. Then, they provided a scapegoat and a solution. Economically, it worked, by literally confiscating the wealth and land of the Jews and redistributing it to Germans. Germany’s economy exploded, but was completely reliant on spoils, requiring an expansionist mindset. Hitler didn’t want just Germany, he wanted all of Eastern Europe, and the World. His system couldn’t work without someone to blame, spoils to pilfer and redistribute, and a common enemy for his people to fear and channel their efforts to combat. This industrial-scale evil eventually reduced Germany, and most of Europe, to ashes and greatly strengthened Communism’s reach across the globe.
Posted by kciDAtaE
Member since Apr 2017
15759 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

The Germans did get screwed at the end of the war, the penalties were far too harsh.


I wouldn’t go that far. The punishment certainly fit the crime. I would agree the harsh sanctions all but guaranteed a second WW with Germany leading the way. In that respect it was not smart. Amazing they were able to get their shite together in only 20 years
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98181 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

The Germans did get screwed at the end of the war, the penalties were far too harsh.


It was payback for the harsh penalties imposed on France after the 1870 Franco-Prussian war. Anyway, after four years of what was the most brutal war in human history up to that time, the loser wasnt going to get off easy.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260351 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:22 pm to
Pretty common belief in those days. Henry Ford was a believer in the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion"

Posted by Nawlens Gator
louisiana
Member since Sep 2005
5832 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:22 pm to
I believe there was a ton of resentment and hatred built up in the German people against the corrupt Weimer Republic and its many big dog Jews. There was lots of corruption and neglect of the German people from 1919 - 1933. The Jewish overlords stuffed their pockets at the expense of the German people which resulted in intense hatred. When Germans regained power under Hitler, Jews were portrayed as a subhuman species that Germany needed to rid itself of. Jewish eradication wasn't just from hatred however, it was also done to cleanse the human species. To the Germans, it was nothing more than the way we spray for mosquitoes to kill them.



This post was edited on 12/17/20 at 1:40 pm
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164127 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

Why did Fuhrer Adolf Hitler hate the jews so much?


Was the respect of his title necessary in the thread title?
Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
22422 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:29 pm to
quote:


What definition are you using, exactly? If we’re being literal, he lost the war, his power, his mind, his life. Seems like a lot of losing to me.


I mean shite....is Jim Kelly a loser?

He lost 4 straight Super Bowls and then had terrible health problems and had to live Buffalo.


No of course not, hes one of the 20-30 best QBs of all time.



And mean Hitler lost all that shite in basically one swoop. And he had to win like 100 things in a row to even get to the point to lose all that.

Is Kurt Cobain a loser? He lost his mind/career/life/family
This post was edited on 12/17/20 at 1:33 pm
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108256 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

The punishment certainly fit the crime.


I don’t see why Germany was any worse of an offender than France or Britain save for shipping Lenin over to Russia.
Posted by Primetime Predator
Member since Nov 2020
1131 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:39 pm to
The Khazarian jews were known to be Satanist & Kiddie didlers.

Maybe thats why?
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48337 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

You don’t see the Jewish star on the hat?


OH!

Yes, that explains it. That's a female Jewish person.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67079 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:42 pm to
Our post-modern progressive history only seems to look at the evils it can take advantage of in order to push the narrative it wants. Often, these evils are motivated by somewhat lesser evils that prior befell the evil oppressors.

People remember the evils of Jim Crow, but not Reconstruction, when the overwhelming majority of people in the southern were stripped of their rights to vote along with their land. It was seen as justified to right the wrongs of Slavery and the Civil War, but it motivated the counter-revolution that was the KKK and Jim Crow laws enforcing segregation.

We remember the suburbanization of America as whites fled the cities during integration, but ignore the unprecedented crime wave and forced bussing that proceeded that migration.

We remember the Trail of Tears, but not the countless frontier massacres that motivated it.

The wrong thing is still the wrong thing, but people are not typically straight evil or good. There is nuance in every person and in every situation. Understanding the context of these causes, effects, and reactions are what learning history SHOULD be all about.

Post-modernism is only about destruction. Thus, it seeks to vilify and destroy, not to educate. It seeks to uproot the fabrics of society so that they can be replaced with whatever new ideal is trendy at the time.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65076 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

I don’t see why Germany was any worse of an offender than France or Britain save for shipping Lenin over to Russia.


Three reasons.

1. France was the "leading" partner of the Entente
2. The vast majority of fighting on the Western Front took place in France and Belgium
3. Of the 9 million French soldiers mobilized between 1914-1918, some 6.6 million were either killed or wounded

France already had revenge on their mind after they got taken to the woodshed by Germany in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-71.
Posted by kciDAtaE
Member since Apr 2017
15759 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

don’t see why Germany was any worse of an offender than France or Britain save for shipping Lenin over to Russia.


I feel Germany bears the most responsibility for the War. They backed and even pushed Austria-Hungary to escalate things with Serbia knowing full well what would happen. Also Germany declaring war on Russia and France was another huge step in escalating the conflict. Then they killed a bunch of people

All the while, Germany had the power to stop all of this from happening.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65076 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

They backed and even pushed Austria-Hungary to escalate things with Serbia knowing full well what would happen.


There was no guarantee the Russian Empire would mobilize. The Kaiser thought (or rather hoped) that the war between Austria and Serbia would be a short, localized conflict that would barely register as a blip in European history. When Tsar Nicholas II announced he was mobilizing his army to protect Serbia it caught just about everyone off guard.
Posted by SCLSUMuddogs
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2010
6860 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

The punishment certainly fit the crime


What was the crime?

Phosphene Gas? While the Germans were 1st, the allies used mustard gas heavily throughout the conflict.

War Mongering? Kaiser Wilhelm: Until 1914, he was described as 'The Apostle of Peace' or the 'Peace Kaiser' who had spent his twenty-six reign attempting to improve the lives of his people and to maintain good relations with his neighbours. Even on the eve of the war, he was desperately seeking some means to resolve the international crisis which had suddenly been blown out of all proportion following the murder of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. He was the last of the European leaders to mobilise his army, and as one American commentator observed he was 'the most sorrowful man in the world' when he realised that war could not be avoided.

War profiteering? The war crippled the German economy, civilians were starving in the streets in the months leading to end of the war. In the end they were also hit with $249 Billion in modern day restitution dollars.

While the western propaganda certainly made Germany out to be the Huns in WW1, they weren't doing anything that everyone else wasn't. WW2 also muddles the issue, because Germany was a very clear bad guy in that situation.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67079 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 2:55 pm to
The only thing that muddies WWII is how evil the Soviet Union was on the allied side, but at the start of the war, Germany and the USSR were on the same side.
This post was edited on 12/17/20 at 3:03 pm
Posted by SCLSUMuddogs
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2010
6860 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

The only thing that muddies WWII is how evil the Soviet Union was on the allied side, but at the start of the war, Germany and the USSR were on the same side.


That wasn't what I meant.

WW2 Germany was the obvious bad guy. WW2 overshadows WW1. People think of the world wars and they think Nazi's and concentration camps. It makes the WW1 germans easier to call the bad guys
Posted by ZappBrannigan
Member since Jun 2015
7692 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 3:25 pm to
For Europeans in general, a few reasons. The first is obviously the the Jews and their part of killing Christ in scripture.

The second is if you ever read histories on sieges, without fail, there's always a Jew shooting messages to the enemy about supplies, morale, and personnel along with deployments over the wall.

Now why is it always a Jew? There's plenty of cowards among the defenders. But literate and knowledgeable cowards are harder to come by. Which ties into the real classical reason. The Jews by virtue of a different education filled necessary monetary and logistical holes in king's admins. They were also a insular group and easily pillaged even though they controlled certain functions when someone needed a scapegoat and some gold. Which lead to them being chased around.

So instead of being a just once thing like the Templars. Everybody got in on the act at some point or another.

So Hitler's stuff was nothing new, just surprising by the industriousness of it since he more or less launched it with "the Jews were shooting messages over the walls again that's why we lost the war!"
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
36610 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

So, they made easy scapegoats for the German people who were disgusted by the new “progressive” lifestyles,


The Jews were an easy scape goat for Europeans everywhere for ever. Whatever vices that were attached to them in post war Germany need to be taken with a grain of salt

It’s wild but it stems from them being able to charge interest on non-Jews while Islam and Christianity forbid usury of any kind. So if you wanted access to capital, you had to go to a Jew.
This post was edited on 12/17/20 at 4:02 pm
Posted by TruBrew
Shreveport
Member since Sep 2019
2261 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

What baffles me even more is that Hitler was pushing for a blonde hair blue eyes super race but he didn't have blonde hair or blue eyes.


That's a deep hole to dive in right there.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram