Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Why are there squatters rights?

Posted on 6/3/22 at 8:35 pm
Posted by couv1217
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Sep 2007
3565 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 8:35 pm
Watching worst roommate ever on Netflix and this episode is about a serial squatter. Why was this ever made into law that someone has the right to come into your place and just take over. You can’t throw their stuff out, change the locks, etc or you’ll be the one arrested. You have to go through a while eviction process. Who was smoking what when it was made into law that it’s cool if someone does that? In Philly, once you have mail sent to the address, you live there.
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
51621 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 8:38 pm to
Never understood this legal concept.
Posted by LSUSkip
Central, LA
Member since Jul 2012
24717 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 8:38 pm to
Yea, that one woman that got kicked out of her own apartment was crazy.The law that allowed that to happen makes absolutely no sense. Was NYC so I would expect nothing less.
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
103974 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 8:40 pm to
This. This is a good thread.

Squatters' Rights and Civil Forfeiture make no damn sense.
Posted by Demshoes
Up in here
Member since Aug 2015
10727 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 8:42 pm to
Civil forfeiture is state sanctioned theft. Disgusting.
Posted by UndercoverBryologist
Member since Nov 2020
8077 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 8:42 pm to
Squatter’s Rights is an English common law concept that carried over to America at some point.

And the concept even has ancient Roman origins.

From Wikipedia:

quote:

In Roman law, usucapio laws allowed someone who was in possession of a good without title to become the lawful proprietor if the original owner did not appear after some time (one or two years), unless the good was obtained illegally (by theft or force). Stemming from Roman law and its successor, the Napoleonic Code, adopted as the basis of law in France, Belgium, Italy, Luxembourg, Portugal, Spain, and also, in part, by the Netherlands and Germany, adverse possession generally recognises two time periods for the acquisition of property: 30 years and some lesser time period, depending on the bona fides of the possessor and the location of the parties involved.[citation needed] Parliament passed England's first general statute limiting the right to recover possession of land in 1623.[5



Edit: Essentially, the concept is to limit the conflict that would exist if someone were to buy a piece of land and abandon it for 40 years, leaving no trace of ownership, and for someone to move in and establish some residence under good faith and then have the original owner show up and claim original ownership.

The law says, in order to maintain possession, you must make a good faith effort to publicize your ownership.


Now, how the law has been perverted over time is another story.
This post was edited on 6/3/22 at 8:48 pm
Posted by FahQGump
Auburn, Al
Member since Dec 2021
1916 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 8:42 pm to
Tell that to the male cops in Auburn who refused to let my go back to the house me and my ex had together to get the rest of my belongings because I hadn’t stayed there in 3 nights and she was well known.
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
49586 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 8:46 pm to
quote:

someone has the right to come into your place and just take over. You can’t throw their stuff out, change the locks, etc or you’ll be the one arrested. You have to go through a while eviction process.


Maybe you do, I don't. Someone every tries to pull that on me I tie them up and duct tape their mouth and dump them off in the middle of no where Mississippi.
Posted by NPComb
Member since Jan 2019
28462 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 8:47 pm to
All I know is if I find some douchebags in either my own, family, or friends houses they will be leaving rapidly with missing teeth… provided they have some to begin with.
Posted by SixthAndBarone
Member since Jan 2019
11097 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 8:50 pm to
Because democrats.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
134499 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 8:52 pm to
quote:

You can’t throw their stuff out, change the locks, etc or you’ll be the one arrested


So you pay a shady type to go there, throw them out and then burn all their stuff
Posted by couv1217
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Sep 2007
3565 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 9:07 pm to
Yes we all know the solution. I’m just trying to figure out wtf did they exist and more importantly why do they still exist.
Posted by BUGAtGOAT
Munroe
Member since Oct 2015
1908 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 9:08 pm to
That is exactly how a slumlord buddy of mine handles it
Posted by TheFlyingTiger
Member since Oct 2009
4144 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 9:08 pm to
Because plebs actually owning property is something the state can't abide.
Posted by tigersmanager
Member since Jun 2010
10902 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 9:14 pm to
It doesn't make any sense
Posted by UndercoverBryologist
Member since Nov 2020
8077 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 9:20 pm to
quote:

Watching worst roommate ever on Netflix and this episode is about a serial squatter. Why was this ever made into law that someone has the right to come into your place and just take over. You can’t throw their stuff out, change the locks, etc or you’ll be the one arrested. You have to go through a while eviction process. Who was smoking what when it was made into law that it’s cool if someone does that? In Philly, once you have mail sent to the address, you live there.


I don’t know the Netflix show well, but it seems like you are describing a roommate situation, in which one roommate has title to the domicile.

This isn’t really a “Squatter’s Rights” issue. It’s more of a tenant’s rights issue. Squatting is specifically a situation where the resident is inhabiting a property that has been basically abandoned and there is a conflict when the legal title owner returns and asks for the resident to be evicted.

The roommate situation you’re describing in the show sounds like a renter/landlord relationship which is governed by a whole other set of common law precedents and statutes.
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
48280 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 9:28 pm to
quote:

I don’t know the Netflix show well, but it seems like you are describing a roommate situation, in which one roommate has title to the domicile.


Homeowner allowed guy to move in as a roommate. Guy basically locked himself in his room and stopped paying rent. Homeowner tried to get guy evicted and ended up getting kicked out of his own house.

Squatters rights should not exist.
Posted by gizmothepug
Louisiana
Member since Apr 2015
8601 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 9:52 pm to
quote:

So you pay a shady type to go there, throw them out and then burn all their stuff


You just forgot about the burning down, collect the insurance check, sell the property and make a profit in today’s world and let someone else deal with the drama.
Posted by grizzlylongcut
Member since Sep 2021
15293 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 10:01 pm to
fricking Democrats, that's why.

Any fricked up thing in this society can be directly traced to Democrats.
This post was edited on 6/3/22 at 10:14 pm
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
114930 posts
Posted on 6/3/22 at 10:02 pm to
This is why God created shovels and lime
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram