- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who is in the wrong? Dogs killed cat
Posted on 11/9/20 at 12:22 pm to TigerDeacon
Posted on 11/9/20 at 12:22 pm to TigerDeacon
quote:
Cat may be out but the cat didn't kill a dog.
How's that? Both animals are the same size
I'm in the camp that both parties share responsibility and it shouldn't have been a public lashing of a single person. Karen's are the true downfall of a once decent society.
This post was edited on 11/9/20 at 12:26 pm
Posted on 11/9/20 at 12:26 pm to Jake88
quote:
No fault. That's speciesist. Why can cats roam free but not dogs?
Because the cats aren't running around killing dogs. Thought that was pretty easy to see from the op.
Posted on 11/9/20 at 12:27 pm to noonan
quote:
Because the cats aren't running around killing dogs.
But they do roam around killing tons of other animals
Posted on 11/9/20 at 12:31 pm to shawnlsu
A few months ago 2 dogs came on my back porch and mangled my daughters 2 kittens. I was able to kill one before it got out of the yard. The other was hit, but managed to escape.
Posted on 11/9/20 at 12:32 pm to shawnlsu
No fault but dogs need to be leashes before they attack a kid . Owner B needs to call animal control on Owner A.
Posted on 11/9/20 at 12:33 pm to shawnlsu
Both were trashy as frick to let their animals roam freely like that anyway.
Posted on 11/9/20 at 12:36 pm to shawnlsu
quote:
hat's where I am at with it but the Karen's in my hood blame the dog owner 100% and called the cops on him.
Not sure why people with dogs are expected to be more responsible with their animals than others. The dogs were no bigger than the cat.
Neither are my animals, just found it interesting that everyone jumped on the dog owner.
Because the dogs violated the leash law, and the cat did not.
Posted on 11/9/20 at 12:39 pm to shawnlsu
Lacking any hard facts, I'd say the cat started it.
Posted on 11/9/20 at 12:40 pm to Salmon
quote:Neither in my opinion. Cats wandering around shitting in my garden, tearing up my boat seats and walking on my truck deserve what they get.
seems like both are to blame here
Posted on 11/9/20 at 12:51 pm to BeerMoney
quote:
dogs need to be leashes before they attack a kid . Owner B needs to call animal control on Owner A.
This. Next time they get out what if it's a 3 year old outside? Dogs are killers and should be put down.
Posted on 11/9/20 at 12:57 pm to MikeD
The only person who has a legitimate beef is the owner of the yard where the fight occurred.
Posted on 11/9/20 at 1:00 pm to shawnlsu
Both are at fault.
Cats shouldn't be allowed to roam any ways. They destroy native bird populations.
Cats shouldn't be allowed to roam any ways. They destroy native bird populations.
Posted on 11/9/20 at 1:00 pm to noonan
Outside cats are awful to most ecosystems they live in.
Posted on 11/9/20 at 1:18 pm to shawnlsu
If cat was de- clawed. Then owner.
If cat not declawed it runs up tree. No harm no foul.
If cat not declawed it runs up tree. No harm no foul.
Posted on 11/9/20 at 1:19 pm to MoarKilometers
quote:
But they do roam around killing tons of other animals
and tearing up flower beds, and scratching cars, ect, ect, ect.
Posted on 11/9/20 at 1:20 pm to TDsngumbo
quote:
Both were trashy as frick to let their animals roam freely like that anyway.
Which is the point I made yesterday before getting blasted by cat-Karens.
Posted on 11/9/20 at 1:22 pm to shawnlsu
The cats? It was stupid for trying to fight 2 dogs.
Posted on 11/9/20 at 1:24 pm to chinhoyang
quote:
Because the dogs violated the leash law, and the cat did not.
quote:
DIVISION 3. - PROHIBITIONS
Sec. 5-58. - Running at large prohibited.
It shall be unlawful for any person to permit an animal to run at large. It shall be the duty of the owner or keeper to have the animal confined within his property or under his immediate control.
EXCEPTION: This prohibition does not apply to working, stock, or hunting dogs.
(Ord. of 2-20-2002, § 3:300)
In case anyone was interested in the actual law instead of talking out of your arse
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News