
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:35 pm to SelaTiger
So... you want them to make an illegal maneuver?
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:36 pm to SelaTiger
Yep. Got that one correct on DMV test and drive test when I was 14 for a learners permit
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:38 pm to udtiger
quote:
So... you want them to make an illegal maneuver?
If you think the left pic above your post is correct, I want to fist fight you in the middle of the street.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:40 pm to GRTiger
Neither car in that photo is
Take your L and go to bed.
quote:
car coming the other way wanting to turn right
Take your L and go to bed.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:41 pm to forkedintheroad
I meant my right, nerd. Are you really trying to score a semantic victory in a substantive debate?
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:44 pm to GRTiger
quote:
quote:
So... you want them to make an illegal maneuver?
If you think the left pic above your post is correct, I want to fist fight you in the middle of the street.
The diagram is correct. I thought he was saying to go unto the outside lane from a left turn.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:47 pm to Epaminondas
This image is correct, notice how the cars align with appropriate lane they would be turning into, this is also why it’s the appropriate move for a u-turn as you need a uniform rule for intersection turns, you can’t have some cars taking the inside and some taking the outside.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 9:51 pm to udtiger
quote:
The diagram is correct.
Eta
The hell is wrong with gifs tonight? Messing up my flow.
This post was edited on 9/24/26 at 9:52 pm
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:29 pm to GRTiger
quote:
I'm about to turn left, but there's a car coming the other way wanting to turn right that is just enough ahead of me
quote:
I meant my right, nerd. Are you really trying to score a semantic victory in a substantive debate?
Ehh I mean that’s kind of a key distinction to clear up, no? You can’t claim opposite car was “turning right” but you really meant turning to your right (that means he’s also taking a damn left opposite of you).
That’s not semantics. No one else would claim that car is “taking a right”.
You confused me too and apparently others. I had read through the earlier messages several times trying to make sense of it. Decided to come back and revisit when things hopefully got cleared up or a diagram provided.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:46 pm to SelaTiger
It’s unbelievable how many people either don't understand this or just don’t care. I drive Airline every day and every trip i see people using the wrong side.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 10:50 pm to Epaminondas
This is what I was thinking they were talking about. It’s definitely the best way. However, people everywhere are much too dumb to comprehend it. Better to just get a higher up vehicle so you can always see even if the other motorist doesn’t know this hack.
Posted on 9/24/26 at 11:26 pm to LemmyLives
quote:
Because that is the fricking way. Because both you, and the people coming in the other direction, can see oncoming traffic that they need to cross. This exact thing happens at an intersection I've crossed over 1k times in two years, and people frick it up, every, single day.
In Texas that depends on the width of the median.
When narrow and correctly crossing in front of each other both cars can usually see oncoming traffic as long as they both start pulling out while angling over (some are poorly designed with curves hiding oncoming traffic).
quote:
Wide Median: the median width is 30 ft or more on at least one of the approaches.
Narrow Median: the median width is less than 30 ft. on both approaches.
https://www.txdot.gov/manuals/trf/sfb/special_signing_situations/divided_highway_intersections_and_crossovers-i9999/median_width-i1000006.html
Above is about signing the intersections which isn’t always done. Many people view it as being the median next to you on your left and do not pay attention that median on other side of intersection (in front of you before turning left) might make it a wide median if that direction doesn’t have a left turn lane or other lane reducing width of the median.
Other thing I used to see was when wide medians got turned into narrow medians with a turn lane or thru lane added by narrowing the median, and drivers would not adapt to change from any of the traffic.
This post was edited on 9/25/26 at 10:59 am
Posted on 9/25/26 at 4:09 am to SelaTiger
You are correct. Many traffic issues are related to bad drivers who don't know the rules of the roads and people on their phones
Posted on 9/25/26 at 5:38 am to Epaminondas
quote:
Is this what you're talking about?
Yep that’s exactly what I was talking about.
Posted on 9/25/26 at 5:40 am to udtiger
quote:
The diagram is correct. I thought he was saying to go unto the outside lane from a left turn.
Yeah, I should have worded it better.
Posted on 9/25/26 at 6:00 am to SelaTiger
I don’t know the rule wherever you live, but here in Texas it depends on the width of the median. Narrow medians, you go to the inside. Wide medians, go to the outside.
But in reality nobody really knows wtf they’re doing so everyone just kind of wings it as best they can.
But in reality nobody really knows wtf they’re doing so everyone just kind of wings it as best they can.
Posted on 9/25/26 at 6:14 am to SelaTiger
I try and do this but invariably the other person doesn’t know the proper way and won’t go past me and thinks I’m the retarded one.
Posted on 9/25/26 at 6:17 am to SelaTiger
We talking tail to tail turning?



Popular
Back to top



4











