Started By
Message

re: What’s the incremental stress and work for an additional kid?

Posted on 3/12/26 at 11:04 am to
Posted by JDPndahizzy
JDP
Member since Nov 2013
6961 posts
Posted on 3/12/26 at 11:04 am to
Not a huge deal if you have a traditional marriage and the wife stays home. If wife works it's a bitch.
Posted by Polar Pop
Member since Feb 2012
10969 posts
Posted on 3/12/26 at 11:05 am to
Having to do all of the same shite again, just with another one hooked to your leg or causing destruction in another room.

With that being said, now that mine are 10 and 12, Im glad I went ahead and got it knocked out.

Posted by Tiger985
Member since Nov 2006
7674 posts
Posted on 3/12/26 at 11:10 am to
Jump from 1 to 2 is significant.

2 to 3 not so bad.

3-4+ like nothing at all.

So I've been told.

I have 3.
Posted by Dr Jekyll
Member since Mar 2026
475 posts
Posted on 3/12/26 at 11:14 am to
Same thing, you just do it all over again. Have them close together. They grow up closer, and you don't have one in diapers then another 8 years later. You have a lot of the toys and a lot of clothes (if they are the same sex). You have the baby seats, all of that. Plan for their own rooms.

You won't be in a panic over every single sneeze, like with the first one. If you have 3 or 4, by the fourth one if no body parts are missing and the blood flow isn't too bad, you'll be like, "put a bandaid on it...you're okay."

My two oldest brothers were 20 months apart. Then there was a 7 year gap and my other brother and I are 35 months apart.

Number three was an OOPS! I was number four and an OMG!

Now, brothers are weird. I can knock the taste out of my brother's mouth, but you damn sure better not hit him. That's just how it is...

This post was edited on 3/12/26 at 12:31 pm
Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
24225 posts
Posted on 3/12/26 at 11:15 am to
quote:

With that being said, now that mine are 10 and 12, Im glad I went ahead and got it knocked out.

Mine are the exact same age as yours. I dont remember it being a huge jump from 1 kid to 2. But, my wife stayed home until they both started school. So it may have been different if you were to ask here .

I do remember the time when the oldest was 4 and the youngest was 2 being particularly rough. They just need so much attention at that age range if you want to raise some normal kids. It was tough for us because it seemed like EVERYTHING revolved around two toddlers. We forgot about each other and drifted apart a little during that time. We had to have a reset and make it a priority to make some time for each other and ourselves.

But we made it through and we have two great kids that are smart and respectful and have lots of friends. Its fun now and im proud of my kids.
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
8359 posts
Posted on 3/12/26 at 11:17 am to
quote:

First one about to hit 2, wife says want second but I can’t imagine doing this again


That's how I felt until our first got to about 3 years old. I don't like the baby stage and a little after. It gets way better after that IMO.

My answer is different from others here because I don't think it's actually double the work. 2 kids are more work than 1 but not double 1.

But also I love being a dad and it's not for everyone. I would have about 10 kids if it were financially, physically, and mentally feasible
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
75019 posts
Posted on 3/12/26 at 11:18 am to
Aren't you loaded? You should have no problem hiring your kids each their own personally nanny. Hell, get the caretaker of the koi pond to watch one of the little shits for a while.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
131447 posts
Posted on 3/12/26 at 11:19 am to
We are soft as a society

Somehow the human race raised kids just fine for thousands of years while at the same time struggling to survive day to day
Posted by sjmabry
Texas
Member since Aug 2013
18944 posts
Posted on 3/12/26 at 11:19 am to
quote:

Just wait until you get to three
Or six
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
8359 posts
Posted on 3/12/26 at 11:24 am to
quote:

We are soft as a society

Somehow the human race raised kids just fine for thousands of years while at the same time struggling to survive day to day


Agreed.

I do have it easier than some though because my wife is a stay at home mom. If there is any way you can afford it, highly recommend.
Posted by fareplay
Member since Nov 2012
6561 posts
Posted on 3/12/26 at 11:26 am to
Because shite costs less and people had more time back then. My wife and I both work full time jobs.

Also for those saying oh just pay a nanny etc. you have any idea how expensive they are?
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
72047 posts
Posted on 3/12/26 at 11:29 am to
First off- youre a pussy and start terrible threads.

Second - your wife is rich. Give her what she wants

Third - if youre concerned about the future, the way you change it is by bringing more good people in the world and doing your best to give them the best future you can

Forth - its a shitload more work. You will often be outnumbered, have to switch to zone defense. It is totally worth it.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
131447 posts
Posted on 3/12/26 at 11:29 am to
quote:

people had more time back then


Men worked a lot more back then

And women did work all day at home

Plus raised kids

Now people complain if their iphone surfing is disrupted by a dirty diaper
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
28244 posts
Posted on 3/12/26 at 11:31 am to
There is only so much time in a day. One kid or 30, you’ll be inundated. Just be thankful for their blessing and the meaning your life will have through their life
This post was edited on 3/12/26 at 11:31 am
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
37396 posts
Posted on 3/12/26 at 11:31 am to
hard but at that age gap its just continuing on what you were already doing (you’re already tired, you’re already still doing diapers and bottles, etc.) so it’s not that hard … and then they start playing with each other in a few years and it’s great
Posted by MSTiger33
Member since Oct 2007
21654 posts
Posted on 3/12/26 at 11:32 am to
You won’t know how easy one kid is until you have the second. 3 is the sweet spot
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89072 posts
Posted on 3/12/26 at 11:32 am to
Do not contribute any more of your DNA to the gene pool. Society has already suffered enough
Posted by Freauxzen
Washington
Member since Feb 2006
38652 posts
Posted on 3/12/26 at 11:35 am to
1 to 2 is the hardest jump, that is talked about often.

I have 2 under 2 right now - 22 months and 6 weeks - and it's brutal. The ping pong at night of who is up when, or who's cry wakes who is pretty bad. The fact that you can leave a 22 month old alone - somewhat - but nor really. She's had some bonks because she's a bit wild sometimes and you are solo for some time, managing both can be hard.


But I wouldn't trade it for anything.

You'd have a bigger gap, and probably have it a little easier, but not much.
Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
44687 posts
Posted on 3/12/26 at 11:38 am to
quote:

wife says want second


Just do it. Never a good time. Mine are almost grown and I miss them being little now. I'd do it again if I could.
Posted by trident
Member since Jul 2007
4861 posts
Posted on 3/12/26 at 11:39 am to
2 is easier when the youngest hits 2 yrs old. You are knee deep in it now, you wont even nothice the difference. Do it and dont look back
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram