- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

What would’ve happened if Britain had surrendered in WWII?
Posted on 12/18/18 at 8:57 pm
Posted on 12/18/18 at 8:57 pm
If that cuck Neville Chamberlain had signed an armistice with Hitler, would the world be a different place today?
Posted on 12/18/18 at 8:57 pm to VolsOut4Harambe
American President would be meeting with the Furher.
Posted on 12/18/18 at 8:58 pm to VolsOut4Harambe
Was it Patton that said we fought the wrong enemy? Without the western front the Germans could have possibly toppled the soviets before they had a chance to come to full strength. It’s an interesting discussion
Posted on 12/18/18 at 9:01 pm to fr33manator
Yes. You can learn more about from the “Killing Patton” book
Posted on 12/18/18 at 9:04 pm to fr33manator
quote:
Was it Patton that said we fought the wrong enemy?
Believe Churchill said after they should not have stopped until they reached Moscow after taking Berlin.
Even if Britain had surrendered I think America still is able to invade Europe either through Italy or much a much more difficult route through Spain. Its an interesting topic

This post was edited on 12/20/18 at 4:19 am
Posted on 12/18/18 at 9:06 pm to fr33manator
Old Adolph was known to disregard treaties. Japan attacks the US and since there are no western Allies to which they will join in fighting the Nazis Hitler never declares war against the states. The good old USA defeats the Japanese. Russia, receiving no material from the US and facing the full might of the Third Reich gets destroyed. The US leaves the Reich to their druthers and Asia is a vastly different continent than what you have today. The “Jewish question” becomes the “Muslim question” and they are liquidated along with all non-Aryans.
This post was edited on 12/18/18 at 9:07 pm
Posted on 12/18/18 at 9:14 pm to udtiger
quote:Is this kinda what you had in mind?
American President would be meeting with the Furher.

Furher =/= Führer
Posted on 12/18/18 at 9:15 pm to VolsOut4Harambe
The government would have unfettered power. They would never have our best interest involved in the decision making.
They'd brainwash us with propaganda, and they'd make sure to control whatever technology was necessary to publish their propaganda.
The government, and their elite associates, would continue to accumulate more power and more wealth at the everyday man's expense.
So, nope. Nothing would have changed.
They'd brainwash us with propaganda, and they'd make sure to control whatever technology was necessary to publish their propaganda.
The government, and their elite associates, would continue to accumulate more power and more wealth at the everyday man's expense.
So, nope. Nothing would have changed.
Posted on 12/18/18 at 9:16 pm to VolsOut4Harambe
Hitler was a moron who should have left the USSR alone and waited for them to join their side.
Posted on 12/18/18 at 9:18 pm to VolsOut4Harambe
If that would’ve happened, then parts of Europe would still be glowing in the dark.
Posted on 12/18/18 at 9:21 pm to fr33manator
quote:
Was it Patton that said we fought the wrong enemy?
Patton was a brilliant military mind but he was dead wrong about this.
To answer the OP's question, we would eventually have fought Germany, and both sides would have nuclear weapons.
Posted on 12/18/18 at 9:22 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
Hitler was a moron
He certainly wasn’t the most sound military tactician.
quote:
should have left the USSR alone and waited for them to join their side.
The Third Reich and USSR signed a non-aggression pact in 1939. However, Hitler viewed Bolshevism as the enemy of National Socialism and always wanted the ideology destroyed, the two would have never “joined sides”.
Posted on 12/18/18 at 9:24 pm to Loaner1231
quote:
The Third Reich and USSR signed a non-aggression pact in 1939. However, Hitler viewed Bolshevism as the enemy of National Socialism and always wanted the ideology destroyed, the two would have never “joined sides”.
Yep. Again, he's a moron because IF they would've became alies, I think that would've made both much stronger. Good thing it didn't happen.
Posted on 12/18/18 at 9:27 pm to Loaner1231
That's what people keep missing. Nazi ideology was founded on Eastern expansion and destruction of Bolshevism. It wasn't debatable. It was going to happen.
ETA although Hitler had a grudging professional admiration for how Stalin ran things.
ETA although Hitler had a grudging professional admiration for how Stalin ran things.
This post was edited on 12/18/18 at 9:31 pm
Posted on 12/18/18 at 9:30 pm to CoastTrashTiger
quote:Uh.... Okay.
Believe Churchill said after they should not have stopped until they reached Berlin after taking Moscow.

Posted on 12/18/18 at 9:31 pm to TSLG
And interesting alternate strategy in this scenario (are we assuming japan still attacks US?)
Would be to let the Germans wear themselves thin fighting the commies while we are fighting the japs, then attack a depleted Germany once they have defeated the Soviets and Japan taps out.
Because to be perfectly honest, the Soviets did most of the heavy lifting in WW2 against the Germans.

Would be to let the Germans wear themselves thin fighting the commies while we are fighting the japs, then attack a depleted Germany once they have defeated the Soviets and Japan taps out.
Because to be perfectly honest, the Soviets did most of the heavy lifting in WW2 against the Germans.

Posted on 12/18/18 at 9:31 pm to VolsOut4Harambe
We would have had to drop a few more bombs
Posted on 12/18/18 at 9:36 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
I think that would've made both much stronger. Good thing it didn't happen.
In my estimation peace was never possible between the two.
I’m not sure it benefits Germany in a non-wartime situation. Other than Lebensraum, the Nazis valued Soviet held territories due to their natural resources. In this scenario the Reich would have to rely heavily on foriegn trade to supply its needs.
As far as the USSR, it doesn’t matter if Japan or the US wins the war in the east. Both the capitalist United States, and Imperial Japanese, are no friend to the Soviets. At best they’d have a Cold War scenario with the Nazis. At worst they’re facing a two front war against vastly superior opponents, especially if the Nazis have the resources of the US until they capture what they need from Ukraine etc.
This post was edited on 12/18/18 at 9:39 pm
Posted on 12/18/18 at 9:39 pm to Loaner1231
quote:Never?
However, Hitler viewed Bolshevism as the enemy of National Socialism and always wanted the ideology destroyed, the two would have never “joined sides”.
Wrong. Your statement is factually incorrect.
I would agree with it being “highly unlikely” that the USSR & Nazi Germany were to have ever joined sides but no one today can categorically exclude that it would have ever happened.
Back to top
