Started By
Message

re: What is the balance between preserving Confederate history and progressing forward?

Posted on 1/16/19 at 9:08 am to
Posted by Airpower
Member since Oct 2018
1101 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 9:08 am to
DEMOCRATS = Rats
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
56108 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 9:13 am to
The only way to do it is on a case by case basis with compromise as a mandatory part for both sides. THEN once the decision is WRT to a monument or statue, the local government must enforce the decision with the force of law.

For example, in NOLA, the PGT Beauregard statue should have remained because of the nexus between this historical figure and the local area.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
71131 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 9:55 am to
quote:

For example, in NOLA, the PGT Beauregard statue should have remained because of the nexus between this historical figure and the local area


I agree.

Liberty Place should have been in a museum where the whole story could have been explained and the monument contextualized so people could learn from it. It's a fascinating and dark chapter of our history, but an extremely important one that teaches the consequences of both marginalizing people, and why forgiving your oppressors to break the cycle of bigotry is so important. The tragic story is the textbook example of oppression sowing hatred causing revenge which creates more oppression (in the opposite direction), sowing more revenge and sparking yet another cycle of oppression back in the first direction and so on and so on.

Beauregard should have remained because of how important he was to New Orleans both before and after the war. He was a true native son who was instrumental in the construction of City Park (hence why his statue overlooked the entrance).

Lee? I would have liked to see that statue remain simply because it was a gorgeous piece of artwork and a historical landmark. Plus, Lee was NOT just some war hero. He became an advocate for peace and reconciliation after the war. He fought for equality, founded schools for freed slaves, and his plantation became Arlington National Cemetery. With all that said, his ties to NOLA are tenuous at best, so while I don't like this statue leaving, I could live with it so long as a suitable figure is erected in his stead AND the Lee statue finds an appropriate home as it is a real work of art.

Jeff Davis? That statue could go, and I'm happy it went to where it belongs, Jefferson Davis's historic home in Biloxi.
Posted by YungFO
Dallas
Member since Mar 2018
1143 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 10:16 am to
quote:

The romans and Aztecs genocided peoples, had slaves, scarificed people, etc.

Should we destroy the coliseum and the Aztec pyramids?


I dont have an opinion either way b/c I really don't care, but are you saying that the statue in Lee Circle in New Orleans is the equivalent of the fricking Coliseum?
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91871 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 11:11 am to
quote:

Banning slavery was the last straw. It was basically the north sanctioning the south and trying to collapse their economy. The war was about money and not trying to free slaves.




The south left because of slavery. That's a fact.

However, that doesn't mean the Union fought to free the slaves, because that's obviously false.
Posted by Placebeaux
Bobby Fischer Fan Club President
Member since Jun 2008
51852 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 11:25 am to
quote:

The south left because of slavery. That's a fact.



Money was the reason.

Fast forward 150 years. Can you name me 1 war since that was fought to free people?
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91871 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 11:35 am to
quote:

Fast forward 150 years. Can you name me 1 war since that was fought to free people?



Did you even read my post? I agree that the Union had no interest in fighting to free slaves.

The south left because slavery was pivotal for their economy
The north thought leaving was treasonous and the Confederacy wasn't recognized
The south thought war was imminent and attacked Fort Sumter.

None of that changes the fact that the entire ordeal started over the south's reaction to the future of slavery.
Posted by Placebeaux
Bobby Fischer Fan Club President
Member since Jun 2008
51852 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 12:15 pm to
Cause and effect

Money was the cause of the war. Banning slavery was the effect of rich people fighting over money. It's always about money. The North did not fight the South because it was racist.
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
56108 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 6:19 pm to
There is no nexus or connection between NOLA and Gen. Lee, kingbob.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram