- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Waukesha Christmas Parade Massacre Trial - Brooks Gets 6-Life Sent. + 762.5 yrs in prison
Posted on 10/25/22 at 9:56 am to MFn GIMP
Posted on 10/25/22 at 9:56 am to MFn GIMP
quote:
I think they normally do an initial polling of the charges after electing a foreman. It won't be an immediate verdict because there are 76 charges but I think it will be pretty quick. Maybe even today depending on how quickly they can get through everything now that he is in the other room and won't ever pledge to come back.
Interesting. Thanks. Yeah this will be done tomorrow at the latest. No way the jury spends two nights at the Hampton Inn
Posted on 10/25/22 at 9:56 am to tterrific
quote:
The real question is at what point does the hand wringing start for "why is it taking so long?"
The only way he isn't convicted on basically everything is if there is a white black supremacist on the jury who just refuses to convict on anything. I don't think that's likely, in Waukesha.
Posted on 10/25/22 at 9:57 am to Bruco
Is the jury able to see him from the other room?
Posted on 10/25/22 at 9:57 am to tterrific
quote:
The real question is at what point does the hand wringing start for "why is it taking so long?"
Depending on when deliberations actually start... if we get towards the end of tomorrow without a verdict I'll start being like "uhhhh wtf is going on jury?"
Posted on 10/25/22 at 9:58 am to gravy553
quote:
Is the jury able to see him from the other room?
I believe so... yes
I think he's on their screens
Posted on 10/25/22 at 9:59 am to rt3
Don't you know that he is dying to object to being called that name. 
Posted on 10/25/22 at 10:00 am to GeauxldnGurl
quote:
He finally learned how to pronounce tacit.
Someone must have given him a heads up. They should help him out with “ask” as well.
Posted on 10/25/22 at 10:02 am to Gris Gris
I really want to know who coached him and taught him what a sovereign citizen was.
Posted on 10/25/22 at 10:05 am to CaptSpaulding
quote:
I really want to know who coached him and taught him what a sovereign citizen was.
Probably some other jailbird.
Posted on 10/25/22 at 10:08 am to Gris Gris
His grand finale will be telling the jury in closing arguments "ladies and gentlemen, I am not Darrell Brooks. If the name don't fit, you must acquit!"
Posted on 10/25/22 at 10:08 am to Gris Gris
Prediction: sentencing will be done on the one year anniversary, Monday Nov. 21.
Posted on 10/25/22 at 10:09 am to CaptSpaulding
quote:
I really want to know who coached him and taught him what a sovereign citizen was.
Someone out there who is just like him, whether in the system or someone who contacted him after his arrest. This embecile prior to this had no idea what a sovereign citizen was. He keeps arguing his constitutional rights when a true cs doesn’t argue based on the constitution because to them it is invalid.
Posted on 10/25/22 at 10:10 am to Ingeniero
How does the judge have the lawful right to drink while reading these charges? Brooks doesn’t have a Yeti cup.
Posted on 10/25/22 at 10:11 am to gravy553
Do y’all think he will actually give a closing argument?
I see him obstructing and refusing to pledge to follow to rules to the point where she forfeits his right.
I think he sees being not allowed to testify, call more witnesses, give a closing, etc as his best appeal route.
I see him obstructing and refusing to pledge to follow to rules to the point where she forfeits his right.
I think he sees being not allowed to testify, call more witnesses, give a closing, etc as his best appeal route.
This post was edited on 10/25/22 at 10:12 am
Posted on 10/25/22 at 10:11 am to gravy553
She is flying through these charges. Already on 16.
Posted on 10/25/22 at 10:12 am to Bruco
quote:Will likely happen.
I see him obstructing and refusing to pledge to follow to rules to the point where she forfeits his right.
Posted on 10/25/22 at 10:12 am to GruntbyAssociation
I'm guessing he's writing out his closing arguments. Any legal way for the judge to see it before he's allowed to speak to let her determine if he's remanded to the other room? Any lawyers in here?
Posted on 10/25/22 at 10:13 am to Bruco
No way he can control himself long enough to make a closing argument.
Besides, whatever he says is going to be stupid.
Besides, whatever he says is going to be stupid.
Posted on 10/25/22 at 10:15 am to NorthGwinnettTiger
She's reading the same thing 61 times, just replacing the names. I don't know shite about the court of law, but why couldn't she just say that each of the following people were endangered/harmed by Brooks, then say that each person mentioned is a different charge?
Posted on 10/25/22 at 10:16 am to lsurulz1515
Every charge must be read aloud.
Popular
Back to top


1





