- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Waukesha Christmas Parade Massacre Trial - Brooks Gets 6-Life Sent. + 762.5 yrs in prison
Posted on 10/21/22 at 6:00 pm to Chucktown_Badger
Posted on 10/21/22 at 6:00 pm to Chucktown_Badger
Brooks didn't present another side to this story.
0
Posted on 10/21/22 at 6:17 pm to Chucktown_Badger
Holy shite is USA Today really trying to defend this dude?
That’s peak gaslighting clown world. frick those pieces of shite. There is no way they write that headline if he is white.
That’s peak gaslighting clown world. frick those pieces of shite. There is no way they write that headline if he is white.
Posted on 10/21/22 at 7:17 pm to Wayne Campbell
quote:
After three weeks he’s now claiming that he did not waive his right to assistance.
he doesn't... if you waive the right to a public defender that's it... the state can't help you any further
he could've hired an attorney to serve in an assistant... but we know he can't afford that
Posted on 10/21/22 at 7:40 pm to rt3
Catching up but this record of his is some insane ramblings.
Hasn’t proven they have the right to practice law? Lol
Hasn’t proven they have the right to practice law? Lol
Posted on 10/21/22 at 7:46 pm to Bruco
One of the guests on Rekieta read through a SovCit handbook or guide to get insight on what he's doing. It basically said to confuse, delay, question legitimacy, refuse to recognize jurisdiction...all stuff that he's doing. The guest even suggested it'd be possible for the prosecution to submit that as evidence, but i really doubt they want that headache at this point. Their case is too solid to bother with that.
Posted on 10/21/22 at 7:46 pm to Bruco
Hold up. Don’t know why I’m just realizing this, but in order to testify on his own behalf, he has to state his name on the record.
This post was edited on 10/21/22 at 7:47 pm
Posted on 10/21/22 at 7:51 pm to Ingeniero
quote:
One of the guests on Rekieta read through a SovCit handbook or guide to get insight on what he's doing. It basically said to confuse, delay, question legitimacy, refuse to recognize jurisdiction...all stuff that he's doing. The guest even suggested it'd be possible for the prosecution to submit that as evidence, but i really doubt they want that headache at this point. Their case is too solid to bother with that.
I have not listened totally consistently. Is this the first time the judge brought up SovCit on the record? Just curious
Posted on 10/21/22 at 7:54 pm to bikerack
quote:
sounds like he is done with his witnesses except for his mom and potentially himself.
yes... according to the witness list... the last 2 witnesses he can call are his mom & himself
of note... his mom was released from her subpoena by the prosecution's office and the DA said they would not help him subpoena his mom since they have regular contact... so it seems like she will have to voluntarily come in to testify on Brooks behalf
that said... there's apparently a news story out there where his mom says she won't testify for him... she also apologized for his actions that day
so testimony should wrap Monday... prosecutors already said they will not have any redirect... so when he wraps then the evidentiary side is done
Posted on 10/21/22 at 8:11 pm to Wayne Campbell
quote:
Hold up. Don’t know why I’m just realizing this, but in order to testify on his own behalf, he has to state his name on the record.
I pray to god he doesn’t realize this until it’s asked Posted on 10/21/22 at 8:23 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
I bet Judge Dorow is begging for the chance to say to him... "say your name and spell it for the record"
Posted on 10/21/22 at 8:26 pm to rt3
That trial is a shitshow - and I'm putting that on the record. The judge is a joke and this should have been over weeks ago. Watched the past few days of it 
Posted on 10/21/22 at 8:55 pm to mjthe
quote:
That trial is a shitshow - and I'm putting that on the record.
agreed... it's a train wreck and I can't stop
quote:
The judge is a joke and this should have been over weeks ago.
she has shown way too much weakness... yes this should've been over a week ago but Brooks has delayed as long as possible
Posted on 10/21/22 at 10:55 pm to rt3
Posted on 10/21/22 at 11:16 pm to tterrific
quote:
I just returned to this rant. Why is this rant going on?
You registered on 9/22 of this year.
To make this nice and easy, go frick your self.
The frick is wrong with you people?
Get bent.
Posted on 10/21/22 at 11:32 pm to rt3
He claimed today that if he asked his mother to appear she would do so. We will see.
Posted on 10/21/22 at 11:46 pm to Gris Gris
All of this commotion over something that a piece of lead that costs less than a dollar could take care of? I don’t care who it is, when it’s cut and dry like this and many other circumstances around the country, see Florida, the POS should’ve have already been sent to his maker.
Posted on 10/22/22 at 9:30 am to roadGator
quote:
roadGator
I was talking about brooks rant you retard. Get a clue.
Posted on 10/22/22 at 10:11 am to Gris Gris
He claimed today that if he asked his mother to appear she would do so. We will see.
I kind of want to see what he does if mommy is a no-show.
I kind of want to see what he does if mommy is a no-show.
Posted on 10/22/22 at 11:14 am to rt3
quote:
YouTube - moment Judge Dorow admits Brooks has her scared
It's a shame that she admitted she was scared at that point. It would have been better to have ignored him. He wasn't moving or making noise for a change. He would have had to stop to question his witness, but it would have been interesting for the jury to see this if he kept it up when they were brought back in.
I wish there were some court watchers in the courtroom to report on the jury's reactions during the trial.
Posted on 10/22/22 at 11:22 am to Gris Gris
quote:i don’t really know if she was legitimately scared.. maybe, but either way I think she wanted to subtly get it on the record that he was attempting to intimidate her. If so, pretty smart IMO
It's a shame that she admitted she was scared at that point
Page 76 of 184
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News