Started By
Message

Was Caligula truly mad? Was he really crazy?

Posted on 12/28/17 at 8:40 pm
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
51395 posts
Posted on 12/28/17 at 8:40 pm
Or was he instead hell-bent on revenge. Step back and think for a second.

His father was murdered by Tiberius. Germanicus was well-loved by the troops and seen as a threat to Caesar. Tiberius and his supporters killed or ruined all of Caligula's family and friends.

So when Caligula assumes power, is he nuts or does he have an overwhelming desire to wreak havoc on the society and culture that destroyed his family? He was the first Roman emperor to realize what absolute power truly meant and was going to teach the class that wiped his family out a true lesson in absolute power?

or was he driven mad by the need for revenge, for living in a kill or be killed world? Just something I was pondering.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
120262 posts
Posted on 12/28/17 at 8:41 pm to
Who knows

Historical records are tenuous at best
Posted by O
Mandeville
Member since Oct 2011
6451 posts
Posted on 12/28/17 at 8:46 pm to
frick no. Propaganda, baby!
Posted by 225bred
COYS
Member since Jun 2011
20386 posts
Posted on 12/28/17 at 8:46 pm to
quote:

Caligula


Hella good porno flick.
This post was edited on 12/28/17 at 8:47 pm
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
52973 posts
Posted on 12/28/17 at 8:47 pm to
I imagine he was alright
Posted by Lacour
Member since Nov 2009
32949 posts
Posted on 12/28/17 at 8:47 pm to
Who the frick cares?
Posted by chinese58
NELA. after 30 years in Dallas.
Member since Jun 2004
30394 posts
Posted on 12/28/17 at 8:48 pm to
Roman privilege.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
52973 posts
Posted on 12/28/17 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

Who the frick cares?



shut up man, some of us really enjoy talking about history

please go away
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
51395 posts
Posted on 12/28/17 at 8:49 pm to
Could've actually been a good movie if Guccioni hadn't taken over the editing himself and destroyed the remaining footage. First 30 minutes with Peter O'Toole is not bad.
Posted by jbgleason
Bailed out of BTR to God's Country
Member since Mar 2012
18902 posts
Posted on 12/28/17 at 8:49 pm to
Doesn’t matter, had lots and lots of sex?
Posted by FlyinTiger93
Member since May 2010
3579 posts
Posted on 12/28/17 at 8:49 pm to
You need to watch less Game of Thrones.
Posted by yurintroubl
Dallas, Tx.
Member since Apr 2008
30164 posts
Posted on 12/28/17 at 8:52 pm to
I'd be curious to hear about all the "little stuff" he did leading up to the "big stuff" that made it to print.
Posted by Lacour
Member since Nov 2009
32949 posts
Posted on 12/28/17 at 8:52 pm to
frick you, Kendal
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76301 posts
Posted on 12/28/17 at 9:04 pm to
I think his horse would’ve made a great consul. I wish horses would replace our legislators.
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
31919 posts
Posted on 12/28/17 at 9:11 pm to
Eh, I never bought into the Tiberius killed Germanicus theory.

Tiberius was basically isolating himself from the world, I know he was all paranoid and what not but he was worried about getting murdered not so much secession.

So I’m gonna say no, Caligula wasn’t out for revenge he’s just crazy as frick
Posted by Duke
Twin Lakes, CO
Member since Jan 2008
35613 posts
Posted on 12/28/17 at 9:17 pm to
Caligula gets power, makes some reasonable decisions that are politically expedient, then gets sick/poisoned and comes back with a boner for exicutions.

Pretty good argument for the crazy.
Posted by Bustedsack
Member since Dec 2017
4387 posts
Posted on 12/28/17 at 9:18 pm to
Caligula was a shark, duh.
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48346 posts
Posted on 12/28/17 at 9:20 pm to
quote:

Who knows Historical records are tenuous at best


This.

Historians must be very careful whenever they feel the urge to reach any conclusion with any kind of certainty because the historical record for so much of history is significantly incomplete.

As such, incomplete historical records is one problem. Another problem is the problem of Propaganda. Sometimes the historical record is inaccurate or contains deliberate lies in order to serve a particular national or political agenda.

The historical records regarding Ancient Rome are often too incomplete to allow us to be certain about many things. With regard to more modern history, even as late at the World Wars, the historical record may be complete but inaccurate due to propaganda. For example, British wartime propaganda for both World Wars has affected our historical interpretation of some issues arising out of both World Wars. This affect continues even to today, 2017.
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 12/28/17 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

Tiberius was basically isolating himself from the world


Right. Don't buy the revenge, rather he saw the power he could wield and had a twisted sense of humor about it all.

Tom Holland's book Dynasty: The Rise and Fall of the House of Caesar was a fantastic read about all the Julio-Claudians
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
51395 posts
Posted on 12/28/17 at 9:24 pm to
Suetonius was not exactly flattering to any of the Caesars.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram